Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:12:17.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Hosts of Soybean Cyst Nematode (Heterodera glycines) in Ohio1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ramarao Venkatesh
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, 2021 Coffey Road
S. Kent Harrison*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, 2021 Coffey Road
Richard M. Riedel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: harrison.9@osu.edu.

Abstract

In greenhouse experiments, Ohio accessions of 22 weed species representing 13 dicot families were screened as alternative hosts of soybean cyst nematode (SCN, Heterodera glycines). Purple deadnettle (Lamium purpureum), henbit (Lamium amplexicaule), field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense), shepherd's-purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris), and a susceptible soybean (Glycine max) cultivar produced SCN population densities of 510, 155, 73, 1, and 366 cysts/450 cm3 soil, respectively, 5 wk after inoculation with eggs from a race 3 SCN population. Purple deadnettle was also a strong host of race 1 SCN and a weak host of race 6 SCN. Average numbers of eggs/cyst among race 3 hosts were highest in purple deadnettle (357), followed by soybean (292), field pennycress (266), henbit (122), and shepherd's-purse (none detected). To our knowledge, henbit is the only SCN host identified here that has been previously identified as a host. The weeds identified as SCN hosts in this study have a winter annual life cycle in Ohio and may serve as sites for SCN reproduction in infested fields during the early or late growing season and when soybean plants are absent.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Salaries and research support were provided in part by State and Federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, manuscript no. 99-13.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1999. National Crop Residue Management Survey. Conservation Tillage Information Center. Purdue University: http://ctic.purdue.edu/survey/sidesoy.html. Date accessed: March 1999.Google Scholar
Doupnik, B. 1993. Soybean production and disease loss estimates for north central United States from 1989-1991. Plant Dis. 77: 11701171.Google Scholar
Epps, J. M. and Chambers, A. Y. 1958. New host records for Heterodera glycines; including one host in the Labiatae. Plant Dis. Rep. 42:194.Google Scholar
Hussey, R. S. 1985. Staining nematodes in plant tissues. In Zuckerman, B. M., Mai, W. F., and Harrison, M. B., eds. Plant Nematology Laboratory Manual. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Agriculture Experiment Station. pp. 197199.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41: 365370.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Berry, M. A. 1991. Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol. 5: 460466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niblack, T. L. 1992. The race concept. In Riggs, R. D. and Wrather, J. A., eds. Biology and Managment of the Soybean Cyst Nematode. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. pp. 7386.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C., eds. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. 589 p.Google Scholar
Riedel, R. M. 1999. Summary of 1998 Soybean Cyst Nematode Sampling Program. Ohio State University: http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/∼ipm/scn/scn6.htm. Date accessed: April 1999.Google Scholar
Riedel, R. M. and Golden, A. M. 1988. First report of Heterodera glycines in Ohio. Plant Dis. 72:363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, R. D. 1992. Host range. In Riggs, R. D. and Wrather, J. A., eds. Biology and Management of the Soybean Cyst Nematode. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. pp. 107114.Google Scholar
Riggs, R. D. and Hamblen, M. L. 1962. Soybean-Cyst Nematode Host Studies in the Family Leguminosae. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 718. 19 p.Google Scholar
Riggs, R. D. and Hamblen, M. L. 1966. Additional weed hosts of Heterodera glycines . Plant Dis. Rep. 50: 1516.Google Scholar
Riggs, R. D., Hamblen, M. L., and Rakes, L. 1981. Intra-species variation in reaction to hosts in Heterodera glycines populations. J. Nematol. 13: 171179.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. 1992. Population dynamics. In Riggs, R. D. and Wrather, J. A., eds. Biology and Management of the Soybean Cyst Nematode. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. pp. 5159.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. and Riggs, R. D. 1989. Population dynamics and management of Heterodera glycines . Agric. Zool. Rev. 3: 253269.Google Scholar
Smart, G. C. 1964. Physiological strains and one additional host of the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines . Plant Dis. Rep. 48: 542543.Google Scholar
Sortland, M. E. and MacDonald, D. H. 1987. Effect of crop and weed species on development of a Minnesota population of Heterodera glycines race 5 after one to three growing periods. Plant Dis. 71: 2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, D. D., Chambers, A. Y., and Young, L. D. 1987. No-tillage effects on population dynamics of soybean cyst nematode. Agron. J. 79: 799802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, H. R., Riedel, R. M., Eisley, J. B., Young, C. E., Jasinski, J. R., Wheeler, T. A., Kauffman, P. H., Pierson, P. E., and Stuart, M. C. 1996. Distribution of Heterodera glycines in Ohio. J. Nematol. 28: 599603.Google ScholarPubMed
Wong, A.T.S. and Tylka, G. L. 1994. Eight nonhost weed species of Heterodera glycines in Iowa. Plant Dis. 78: 365367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar