Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T21:02:55.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control with Halauxifen-Methyl Applied Alone and in Mixtures with 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Marcelo Zimmer Open the ORCID record for Marcelo Zimmer [Opens in a new window] ,
Bryan G. Young  and
William G. Johnson
Marcelo Zimmer*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Marcelo Zimmer, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. (E-mail: zimmer6@purdue.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Synthetic auxin herbicides such as 2,4-D and dicamba are often utilized to control broadleaf weeds in preplant burndown applications to soybean. Halauxifen-methyl is a new synthetic auxin herbicide for broadleaf weed control in preplant burndown applications to corn, cotton, and soybean at low use rates (5 g ae ha–1). Field experiments were conducted to evaluate efficacy and weed control spectrum of halauxifen-methyl applied alone and in mixtures with 2,4-D (560 g ae ha–1), dicamba (280 g ae ha–1), and glyphosate (560 g ae ha–1). Glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed was controlled with halauxifen-methyl applied alone (90% control) and in mixtures (87% to 97% control) 35 d after treatment (DAT). Common ragweed was controlled 93% with halauxifen-methyl applied alone and 91% to 97% in mixtures 35 DAT. Halauxifen-methyl applied alone resulted in poor giant ragweed control 21 DAT (73% control); however, mixtures of halauxifen-methyl with 2,4-D, dicamba, or glyphosate controlled giant ragweed (86% to 98% control). Halauxifen-methyl alone resulted in poor redroot pigweed control (62% control) 21 DAT; however, mixtures of halauxifen-methyl with dicamba, 2,4-D, or glyphosate controlled redroot pigweed (89% to 98% control). Halauxifen-methyl controls GR horseweed and common ragweed applied alone and in mixtures with other synthetic auxin herbicides and glyphosate. Furthermore, mixing 2,4-D or dicamba with halauxifen-methyl can increase the weed control spectrum in preplant burndown applications.

Keywords

Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, Lincoln2,4-Ddicambaglyphosatehalauxifen-methylcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBELgiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. AMBTRhorseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREcorn, Zea mays L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrBurndown broadleaf controlspring preplant applicationsynthetic auxins
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 597 - 602
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, A, Streibig, JC, Duus, J, Andreasen, C (2013) Use of image analysis to assess color response on plants caused by herbicide application. Weed Technol 27:604–611 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2010) Clarity® herbicide. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld797012.pdf. Accessed: September 12, 2017Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013) Shredder® 2,4-D LV6. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldAO5005.pdf. Accessed: September 12, 2017Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017) ElevoreTM. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldE1J001.pdf. Accessed: September 12, 2017Google Scholar
Braz, GBP, Oliveira, RS, Zobiole, LHS, Rubin, RS, Voglewede, C, Constantin, J, Takano, HK (2017) Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) control in no-tillage soybean with diclosulam plus halauxifen-methyl. Weed Technol 31:184–192 Google Scholar
Brown, LR, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2016) Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane in corn with preplant herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 96:932–934 Google Scholar
Bruce, JA, Kells, JJ (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 4:642–647 Google Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with dicamba applied preplant and postemergence in dicamba-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 27:492–496 Google Scholar
[EFSA] European Food Safety Authority (2014) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halauxifen‐methyl (XDE‐729 methyl). EFSA J 12:3913 93 pGoogle Scholar
Epp, JB, Alexander, AL, Balko, TW, Buysse, AM, Brewster, WK, Bryan, K, Daeuble, JF, Fields, SC, Gast, RE, Green, RA, Irvine, NM, Lo, WC, Lowe, CT, Renga, JM, Richburg, JS, Ruiz, JM, Satchivi, NM, Schmitzer, PR, Siddall, TL, Webster, JD, Weimer, MR, Whiteker, GT, Yerkes, CN (2016) The discovery of Arylex TM active and Rinskor TM active: Two novel auxin herbicides. Bioorg Med Chem 24:362–371 Google Scholar
Ferreira, T, Rasband, W (2012) ImageJ user guide (IJ 1.46r). https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide/user-guide.pdf. Accessed: October 9, 2017Google Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Jhala, AJ (2017) Glyphosate-resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in Nebraska: confirmation and response to postemergence corn and soybean herbicides. Weed Technol 31:225–237 Google Scholar
Gibson, KD, Johnson, WG, Hillger, DE (2005) Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol 19:1065–1070 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2017) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: September 13, 2017Google Scholar
Johnson, B, Loux, M, Nordby, D, Sprague, C, Nice, G, Westhoven, A, Stachler, J (2006) The glyphosate, weeds, and crops series: biology and management of giant ragweed. https://weedscience.missouri.edu/publications/gwc-12.pdf. Accessed: October 15, 2017Google Scholar
Jordan, T, Nice, G, Smeda, R, Sprague, C, Loux, M, Johnson, B (2007) The glyphosate, weeds, and crops series: biology and management of common ragweed. Purdue Ext Publ GWC-14. https//weedscience.missouri.edu/publications/gwc-14.pdf. Accessed: September 15, 2017Google Scholar
Landini, G (2009) Threshould colour: ImageJ. http://www.mecourse.com/landinig/software/software.html. Accessed: October 13, 2017Google Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010a) Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 24:425–429 Google Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010b) Growth and seed production of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations after exposure to postemergence 2,4-D. Weed Sci 58:413–419 Google Scholar
Loux, M, Stachler, J, Johnson, B, Nice, G, Davis, V, Nordby, D (2006) Biology and management of horseweed. The glyphosate, weeds, and crops series. Purdue Extension. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/gwc/gwc-9-w.pdf. Accessed: September 11, 2017Google Scholar
Loux, MM, Doohan, D, Dobbles, AF, Johnson, WG, Young, BG, Legleiter, TR, Hager, A (2017) 2017 Weed control guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/u.osu.edu/dist/7/3461/files/2016/12/2017-Weed-Control-Guide-tnkpfi.pdf. Accessed: September 8, 2017. 216 pGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, KJ, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2017) Post-emergence herbicides for control of glyphosate- resistant Canada fleabane in corn. Can J Plant Sci 97:206–209 Google Scholar
Mithila, J, Hall, JC, Johnson, WG, Kelley, KB, Riechers, DE (2011) Evolution of resistance to auxinic herbicides: Historical perspectives, mechanisms of resistance, and implications for broadleaf weed management in agronomic crops. Weed Sci 59:445–457 Google Scholar
Montgomery, GB, Treadway, JA, Reeves, JL, Steckel, LE (2017) Effect of time of day of application of 2,4-D, dicamba, glufosinate, paraquat, and saflufenacil on horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control. Weed Technol 31:550–556 Google Scholar
Payne, KK, Sleugh, BB, Bradley, KW (2010) Impact of herbicides and application timing on weed control, yield, and nutritive value of tall fescue pastures and hayfields. Weed Technol 24:515–522 Google Scholar
Schmitzer, PR, Balko, TW, Daeuble, JF, Epp, JB, Satchivi, NM, Siddall, TL, Weimer, MR, Yerkes, CN (2015) Discovery and SAR of halauxifen methyl: a novel auxin herbicide. Pages 247–260 in Maienfisch P & Stevenson TM eds., Discovery and Synthesis of Crop Protection Products. ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society. New York: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Thompson, MA, Steckel, LE, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2007) Soybean tolerance to early preplant applications of 2,4-D ester, 2,4-D amine, and dicamba. Weed Technol 21:882–885 Google Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012a) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) control with preplant herbicides in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Can J Plant Sci 92:913–922 Google Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012b) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in dicamba-tolerant soybean. Weed Technol 26:422–428 Google Scholar
Wilson, JS, Worsham, DA (1988) Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci 36:648–652 Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2016 Survey of the most common and troublesome weeds in broadleaf crops, fruits, & vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016_Weed_Survey_Final.xlsx. Accessed: October 15, 2017Google Scholar