Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:28:28.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surfactants and Oil Adjuvants with Nicosulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Tadeusz Praczyk
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Robert Matysiak
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

Nicosulfuron is used with surfactant or oil adjuvant to enhance postemergence efficacy. Yellow foxtail fresh weight reduction from nicosulfuron varied from 10 to 92% depending upon surfactant in greenhouse experiments. Oil adjuvants differed in enhancement of nicosulfuron phytotoxicity to yellow foxtail or large crabgrass with methylated canola oil being most effective, followed by vegetable oils, and petroleum mineral oil as least effective. Percentage and type of surfactant used as an emulsifier in an oil adjuvant was important to nicosulfuron phytotoxicity especially when applied with the less effective oils, but was of minimal importance when applied with methylated canola oil. Adjuvant effectiveness was directly related to nicosulfuron absorption. These data indicated that recommendations for adjuvants to maximize nicosulfuron phytotoxicity should be limited to specific products.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Black, F. S. 1968. New concept for spray tank adjuvants. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 23:39.Google Scholar
2. Green, J. M., Brown, P.A., Berengut, D., and King, M. G. 1992. Nonionic surfactant property effects on thifensulfuron methyl performance. p. 525532 in Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
3. Green, J. M. and Green, J. H. 1993. Surfactant structure and concentration strongly affect rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 7:633640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Manthey, F. A., Horsley, R. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Relationship between surfactant characteristics and the phytotoxicity of CGA-136872. p. 258270 in Bode, L. E. and Chasin, D. G., eds. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems. ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
5. Manthey, F. A., Matysiak, R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Petroleum oil and emulsifier affect the phytotoxicity of imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:8184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Manthey, F. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Relative wax solubility and phytotoxicity of oil to green foxtail. p. 463473 in Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
7. Nalewaja, J. D., Matysiak, R., and Manthey, F. A. 1993. Commercial adjuvants with nicosulfuron and glyphosate. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. No. 315.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J. D., Woznica, Z., and Manthey, F. A. 1991. DPX-V9360 efficacy with adjuvants and environment. Weed Technol. 5:9296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar