Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T13:48:46.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spray Deposits from Nicosulfuron with Salts that Affect Efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John D. Nalewaja*
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
Robert Matysiak
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5051
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: john__nalewaja@ndsu.nodak.edu.

Abstract

Nicosulfuron efficacy varies with surfactant, natural salts in the spray water carrier, and added nitrogen fertilizer salts. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were taken of nicosulfuron spray droplet residue on large crabgrass in the greenhouse. Spray residue characteristics differ for nicosulfuron applied with surfactants alone and with specific salts. Uniform deposits with close contact to the leaf epicuticular surface generally related positively to nicosulfuron efficacy. Ammonium salt enhancement of nicosulfuron phytotoxicity when with surfactant X-77® related to a change from a ring to a uniform deposit. Spray mixtures containing Tween 20 or Atplus 300F surfactants that gave distinct dark amorphous deposits over anticlinal cell walls generally related to effective nicosulfuron treatments. Salts that were antagonistic to nicosulfuron phytotoxicity left a large amorphous deposit, including ammonium nitrate antagonism of nicosulfuron applied with Pluronic® P85 surfactant and general antagonism from sodium bicarbonate. The SEM information indicates that the effect of surfactants and salts on spray deposit characteristics influence nicosulfuron efficacy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bukovac, M. J., Leon, J. M., Cooper, J. A., Whitmoyer, R. E., Reichard, D. L., and Brazee, R. O. 1995. Spray droplet:plant surface interaction and deposit formation as related to surfactants and spray volume. In Gaskin, R. E., ed. Adjuvants for Agrochemicals, Fourth Int. Symp., New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Bull. 193. pp. 177185.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Brown, P. A. 1990. Influence of surfactant properties on nicosulfuron, DPX-E9636, and thifensulfuron performance in corn. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Conference. Germany, 1990.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Green, J. H. 1993. Surfactants structure and concentration strongly affect rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 7: 633640.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W., Jourdan, S. W., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Magnusson, M. V. 1993. Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass. Weed Sci. 41: 325334.Google Scholar
Hess, D. F. and Falk, R. H. 1990. Herbicide deposition on leaf surfaces. Weed Sci. 38: 280288.Google Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Czajka, M., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1995. Nonionic surfactant properties affect enhancement of herbicides. In Hall, F. R., ed. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials. pp. 278287.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., DeVilliers, B., and Matysiak, R. 1996. Surfactant and salt affect glyphosate retention and absorption. Weed Res. 36: 241247.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Matysiak, R., and Freeman, T. P. 1992. Spray droplet residual of glyphosate in various carriers. Weed Sci. 40: 576589.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Praczyk, T., and Matysiak, R. 1995. Salts and surfactants influence nicosulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 9: 587593.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Praczyk, T., and Matysiak, R. 1998. Nitrogen fertilizer, oil, and surfactant adjuvants with nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 12: 585589.Google Scholar
Stock, D., and Holloway, P. J. 1993. Possible mechanism for surfactant-induced foliar uptake of agrichemicals. Pestic. Sci. 38: 165177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar