Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:33:06.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Chlorimuron and Imazaquin as Influenced by Soil Moisture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry J. Newsom
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1989 and 1990 to evaluate differential soybean cultivar tolerance to chlorimuron and imazaquin applied PPI, as influenced by soil moisture. Natural rainfall was supplemented with irrigation to achieve three moisture regimes: low (nonirrigated), optimum (5 cm wk–1), and excessive (15 cm wk–1). Imazaquin at 140 g ai ha–1 did not adversely affect height or yield of cultivars under any of the moisture regimes. Excessive moisture, regardless of herbicide treatment, reduced height and yield with many of the cultivars. Chlorimuron at 80 g ai ha–1 caused additional plant height reductions of 8 cm or more with ‘Asgrow 5403% ‘Asgrow 5979’, ‘Coker 686’, ‘Asgrow 6785’, ‘Hartz 6686’, and 'Sharkey’ in the excessive moisture regime, and yield was reduced 450 kg ha–1 or more with ‘Hutcheson’, ‘Terra-Vig 515’, Coker 686, Asgrow 6785, and Hartz 6686. Chlorimuron in the optimum moisture regime reduced the height of Coker 686 and ‘Deltapine 566’ 10 and 11 cm, respectively; however, no yield reductions were noted.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Chapter 3: Sulfonylurea herbicides, p. 117189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action, Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Borggaard, O. K. and Streibig, J. C. 1988. Chlorsulfuron adsorption by humic acid, iron oxides, and montmorillonite. Weed Sci. 36:530534.Google Scholar
3. Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987. Imazaquin (Scepter)®: A new soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 1:186188.Google Scholar
4. Edwards, C. J., Barrentine, W. L., and Kilen, T. C. 1976. Inheritance of sensitivity of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Crop Sci. 16:119120.Google Scholar
5. Fredrickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:328332.Google Scholar
6. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788793.Google Scholar
7. Graf, G. T. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1976. Differential response of potato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:137139.Google Scholar
8. Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutcheson, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:355363.Google Scholar
9. Griffin, J. L. and Habetz, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:459462.Google Scholar
10. Hackett, N. 1990. Imazaquin behavior in the soil. American Cyanamid Co. Publ. PE 12121. American Cyanamid Co., Wayne, NJ.Google Scholar
11. Hammes, G. G., Hughes, M. R., and Sebastian, S. 1991. Development update on enhanced sulfonylurea tolerance in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:377.Google Scholar
12. Hayes, R. M. and Wax, L. M. 1975. Differential interspecific response of soybean cultivars to bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:516521.Google Scholar
13. Heatherly, L. G. and Pringle, H. C. III. 1991. Soybean cultivars' response to flood irrigation of clay soil. Agron. J. 83:231236.Google Scholar
14. Kent, L. M., Barrentine, W. L., and Wills, G. D. 1988. Response of twenty determinate soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:50.Google Scholar
15. Kern, A. D., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Influence of soil moisture on tolerance of corn to cyanazine. Weed Sci. 23:522524.Google Scholar
16. Martin, D. M., Worthington, J. P., and Gray, E. 1987. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar response to fluchloralin, metribuzin, and vernolate. Weed Technol. 1:282285.Google Scholar
17. Moberg, W. K. 1990. Herbicides inhibiting branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis. Pestic. Sci. 29:241246.Google Scholar
18. Pomeranke, G. J. and Nickell, C. D. 1988. Inheritance of chlorimuron ethyl sensitivity in the soybean strains BSR 101 and M74-462. Crop. Sci. 28:5960.Google Scholar
19. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:7883.Google Scholar
20. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin. Weed Sci. 36:625628.Google Scholar
21. Runyan, W. K., McNeil, W. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:9497.Google Scholar
22. Scott, H. D., DeAngulo, J., Daniels, M. B., and Wood, L. S. 1989. Flood duration effects on soybean growth and yield. Agron. J. 81:631636.Google Scholar
23. Shaner, D. L. 1989. Factors affecting soil and foliar bioavailability of imidazolinones. American Cyanamid Co. Publ. FHT-D269-2M-8902, Princeton, NJ. 23 p.Google Scholar
24. Shaw, D. R., Smith, C. A., and Coats, G. E. 1988. Metribuzin tolerance in soybeans. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 152, 10 p.Google Scholar
25. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Caviness, C. E. 1973. Differential responses of soybean cultivars to propanil. Weed Sci. 21:279281.Google Scholar
26. Stephenson, G. R., McLeod, J. E., and Phatak, S. C. 1976. Differential tolerance of tomato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:161165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Tripp, T. N. and Baldwin, F. L. 1988. Effect of excessive precipitation on soybean injury from imazaquin and chlorimuron. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:39.Google Scholar
28. Wax, L. M., Bernard, R. L., and Hayes, R. M. 1974. Response of soybean cultivars to bentazon, bromoxynil, chloroxuron, and 2,4-DB. Weed Sci. 22:3541.Google Scholar
29. Wehtje, G., Dickens, R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hajek, B. F. 1987. Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 35:858864.Google Scholar
30. Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251256.Google Scholar
31. Willard, T. S. and Griffin, J. L. 1989. Soybean tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:38.Google Scholar
32. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Differential response of soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:430433.Google Scholar