Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:27:52.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction Of Isoxaflutole Injury To Corn (Zea Mays) with Herbicide Safeners And Water-repellent Adjuvants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric A. Nelson  and
Donald Penner
Eric A. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: pennerd@msu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to evaluate herbicide safeners and water repellents for their efficacy in reducing injury caused by isoxaflutole to corn at four application timings (PRE, spike, two-leaf, and four-leaf), and to evaluate the retention of the combinations of isoxaflutole, herbicide safeners, and water-repellent adjuvants. The safeners R-29148 and furilazole decreased injury from isoxaflutole when applied PRE. Corn injury increased from POST applications at the two-leaf and four-leaf stage of isoxaflutole mixed with safeners compared with isoxaflutole alone. The safeners may have acted as adjuvants to increase isoxaflutole absorption. The water-repellent adjuvants did not reduce injury when applied POST with isoxaflutole. However, the combination of safener plus the water repellent DC 1-6184 reduced corn injury from POST applications of isoxaflutole. The water repellent DC 1-6184 reduced spray retention of spray solutions containing isoxaflutole or isoxaflutole plus safener.

Keywords

Furilazole, isoxaflutole, mesotrione, R-29148corn, Zea mays L. ‘Dekalb 44–46’AdjuvantsprotectantsDAT, d after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 999 - 1003
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C., Krushwaha, S., and Mitra, S. 1999. Response of various weed species and corn to RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13:504–509.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. 1997. Regulation of xenobiotic degrading enzymes with herbicide safeners. in Hatzios, K.K., ed. Regulation of Enzymatic Systems Detoxifying Xenobiotics in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Academic. 275–288.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Hoagland, R. E. 1989. Crop Safeners for Herbicides. San Diego, CA Academic. 400.Google Scholar
Hoffman, O. L. 1962. Chemical seed treatments as herbicidal antidotes. Weeds 10:322–323.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M. and Pallett, K. E. 1996. Isoxaflutole for weed control in maize. Pesticide Outlook 29–32.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. A. and Penner, D. 2006. Enhancing herbicide selectivity with water-repellent adjuvants. Weed Technol. 20:125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, D. 2000. Activator adjuvants. Weed Technol. 14:785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999a. Weed control and corn tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13:713–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1999b. Enhancing the margin of selectivity of RPA 201772 in Zea mays with antidotes. Weed Sci. 47:492–497.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1999c. Physiological basis for tolerance of four Zea mays hybrids to RPA 201772. Weed Sci. 47:631–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1999d. Protection of corn from early postemergence applications of isoxaflutole with metolachlor + benoxacor. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 39:137–138.Google Scholar