Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T05:20:00.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Red Rice (Oryza sativa) Biology. II. Ecotype Sensitivity to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jose A. Noldin
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
James M. Chandler*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
Mary L. Ketchersid
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
Garry N. McCauley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Eagle Lake, TX 77434
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jm-chandler@tamu.edu.

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate sensitivity of red rice ecotypes from Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas to soil- and foliar-applied herbicides. Ecotype response to herbicides was variable. Molinate at 4.48 kg ai/ha controlled red rice ecotypes 92 to 100% and cultivars ‘Lemont,’ ‘Mars,’ and ‘Maybelle’ 39 to 63%. Red rice control with thiobencarb at 4.48 kg ai/ha was at least 89%. The tank mixture of fenoxaprop at 0.08 kg ai/ha plus fluazifop-P at 0.10 kg ai/ha controlled red rice and rice cultivars more than for either herbicide applied alone. Red rice and rice cultivar control with paraquat at 0.70 kg ai/ha was 83 to 100%. Blackhulled red rice TX 4 was less sensitive to paraquat and glufosinate than other ecotypes and cultivars. Glufosinate at 1.12 kg ai/ha was required to provide at least 94% control of ecotype TX 4.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address of senior author: ‘Bolsista do CNPq - Brasilia, Brazil,’ EPAGRI/Estção Experimental de Itajaí, Caixa Postal 277, Itajaí, SC, Brazil, 88301-970.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1992. Rice Production Guidelines. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Extension Service Bull. D-1253. 82 p.Google Scholar
Baker, J. B., Sonnier, E. A., and Shrefler, J. W. 1986. Integration of molinate use with water management for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 34:916922.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L. and Street, J. E. 1985. Red rice control with postemergence herbicides. Mississippi Slate, MS: Mississippi Agricultural Forest Experiment Station Bull. 938. 5 p.Google Scholar
Botterman, J., D'Halluin, K., De Block, M., De Greef, W., and Leemans, J. 1991. Engineering of glufosinate resistance and evaluation under field conditions. In Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. K., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. pp. 355363.Google Scholar
Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Bridges, D. C. 1987. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) ecotype response to herbicides. Weed Technol. 1:221225.Google Scholar
Constantin, M. J. 1960. Characteristics of red rice in Louisiana. . Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA. 94 p.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H., Baker, J. B., and Sanders, D. E. 1990. Current weed control strategies in Louisiana rice. In Grayson, B. T., Green, M. B., and Copping, L. G., eds. Pest Management in Rice. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. pp. 328337.Google Scholar
Croughan, T. P. 1994. Herbicide resistant rice. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 25:44.Google Scholar
Galli, J. 1991. Manejo del arroz rojo. In Centra Int. Agric. Trop., ed. Arroz en America Latina, Mejoramiento y Comercialización. Cali, Colombia: CIAT. pp. 168170.Google Scholar
Gasquez, J. and Darmency, H. 1991. Variability in herbicide response within weed species. Brighton, England: Proc. 1991 British Crop Protection Conference, Weeds. pp. 10231032.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. 1978. Factors influencing the selection of herbicide-resistant biotypes of weeds. Outlook Agric. 9:283287.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Baker, J. B. 1990. Tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars to fenoxaprop, sethoxydim, and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 38:528531.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Dunand, R. T., Baker, J. B., Regan, R. P., and Cohn, M. A. 1991. Integrating red rice control measures in soybeans rice rotations. Louisiana Agric. 34(3): 67.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B., Smith, R. J. Jr., Helms, R. S., and Baltazar, A. M. 1992. Rice cultivar response to rice herbicides and simulated rice herbicide drift to sensitive crops. Arkansas Exp. Stn. Res. Ser. 422:6972.Google Scholar
Helton, T. L. 1995. Possible red rice cure for farmers in the south. Rice J. 98(2): 1620.Google Scholar
Hoagland, R. E. 1978. Isolation and properties of an aryl acylamidase from red rice, Oryza sativa L., that metabolizes 3',4'-dichloropropionanilide. Plant Cell Physiol. 19:10191029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langevin, S. A., Clay, K., and Grace, J. B. 1990. The incidence and effects of hybridization between cultivated rice and its related weed red rice (Oryza sativa L.). Evolution 44:10001008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linder, C. R. and Schmitt, J. 1994. Assessing the risks of transgene escape through time and crop-wild hybrid persistence. Mol. Ecol. 3:2330.Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Leach, G. E. 1994. Comparative studies on graminicide-resistant and susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica . Weed Res. 34:177185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noldin, J. A., Chandler, J. M., and Ketchersid, M. L. 1994. Herbicide sensitivity in red rice (Oryza sativa L.) ecotypes. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 25:161162.Google Scholar
Price, S. C., Hill, J. E., and Allard, R. W. 1983. Genetic variability for herbicide reaction in plant populations. Weed Sci. 31:652657.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. and Baker, J. B. 1979. Response of selected rice (Oryza sativa) lines to molinate. Weed Sci. 27:219223.Google Scholar
Sankula, S., Braverman, M. P., Jodari, F., Linscombe, S. D., and Oard, J. H. 1997. Evaluation of glufosinate on rice (Oryza sativa) transformed with the BAR gene and red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 11:7075.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water-seeded rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 29:663666.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr., and Hill, J. E. 1990. Weed control technology in U.S. rice. In Grayson, B. T., Green, M. B., and Copping, L. G., eds. Pest Management in Rice. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc. pp. 314327.Google Scholar
Sonnier, E. A. 1978. Cultural control of red rice. In Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice Research and Control. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. B-1270. pp. 1015.Google Scholar
Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Response of quackgrass biotypes to glyphosate and quizalofop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:803810.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1991. The influence of intraspecific variation on the biology and control of agricultural weeds. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. 3:9971006.Google Scholar
Wirjahardja, S. and Parker, C. 1978. Chemical control of wild and red rice. Proc. Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. 6:315321.Google Scholar
Wirjahardja, S. and Susilo, H. 1979. Chemical control of wild perennial Oryza rufipogon Griff. and Indonesian red rice. Proc. Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. 7:1924.Google Scholar