Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:09:38.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonchemical Options for Delaying Weed Resistance to Herbicides in Midwest Cropping Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chris M. Boerboom
Chris M. Boerboom*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: boerboom@facstaff.wisc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide-resistant weeds are becoming a major problem in the Midwest, and strategies must be adopted to delay further selection. Strategies of rotating and tank-mixing herbicides with different modes of actions should be effective, but adoption may be limited and certain limitations may exist. Therefore, integrating nonchemical practices that indirectly lower selection pressure or restrict the growth of resistant populations is desirable. Appropriate integration of mechanical weeding, crop rotation, increased crop competition, and decision aids may further delay the development of resistance. Understanding the effect of these practices on weed population dynamics is required to more accurately predict their contributions toward resistance management. This knowledge will aid in justifying the adoption of improved management systems.

Keywords

Crop competitioncrop rotationcultivationintegrated weed managementmechanical weedingweed shiftsACCase, acetyl-CoA carboxylaseALS, acetolactate synthaseMOA, mode of action
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 636 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1991. Wisconsin 1991 Pesticide Use. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Agriculture Statistics Service. 31 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997. 1996 Wisconsin Pesticide Use. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Agriculture Statistics Service. 48 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998a. 1997 Agricultural Chemical Usage: 1997 Field Crop Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service. 98 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998b. Crop Production—Acreage–Supplement. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service. 102 p.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997. Mapping risk areas for resistance to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail, Setaria faberi, and velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, density and control in corn, Zea mays . Weed Sci. 36:642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussan, A. J., Burnside, O. C., Orf, J. H., Ristau, E. A., and Puettman, K. J. 1997. Field evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes for weed competitiveness. Weed Sci. 45:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapar, G. F., Curry, M. P., and Gray, M. E. 1995. Survey of integrated pest management practices in central Illinois. J. Prod. Agric. 8:483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapar, G. F., Curry, M. P., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Growers acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois. Weed Technol. 11:828–831.Google Scholar
Doll, J., Doersch, R., Proost, R., and Kivlin, P. 1992. Reduced Herbicide Rates: Aspects to Consider. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Coop. Ext. Bull. A3563. 8 p.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 325–348.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990. Modelling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4:186–198.Google Scholar
Gunsolus, J. L. 1990. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 5:114–119.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Van Kooten, B. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Hall, E. M., and Fawcett, R. S. 1993. On-farm evaluation of mechanical and chemical weed management practices in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:1001–1004.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 1998. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet. 09 September 1998. Available at www.weedscience.com.Google Scholar
Heider, D. J. 1996. Growth and Development Responses of Eastern Black Nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum Dun.) and Hairy Nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides Sendt.) to Crop Competition. . University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 129 p.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Brule-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44:176–193.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Hoverstad, T. R., and Greenwald, R. E. 1998. Integrated weed management using narrow corn row spacing, herbicides, and cultivation. Agron. J. 90:40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, B. D., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:2–13.Google Scholar
Owen, M.D.K., Hartzler, R. G., Buhler, D. D., and Duffy, M. D. 1998. What influences weed management decisions? Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:31.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Preston, C., Bryan, I. B., and Jutsum, A. R. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. In Sparks, D. L., ed. Advances in Agronomy. Volume 58. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 57–93.Google Scholar
Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 32:638–645.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M. 1992. Influence of tillage, crop rotation, and weed management on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) population dynamics and corn yield. Weed Sci. 40:645–653.Google Scholar
Stephenson, G. R., Dykstra, M. D., McLaren, R. D., and Hamill, A. S. 1990. Agronomic practices influencing triazine-resistant weed distribution in Ontario. Weed Technol. 4:199–207.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wiederholt, R. J. 1995. Giant foxtail resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Sci. 43:527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1995. Influence of narrow row/high population corn on weed control and light transmittance. Weed Technol. 9:113–118.Google Scholar
Williams, B. J. 1996. Biology and Control of Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum). . University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 206 p.Google Scholar
Wrubel, R. P. and Gressel, J. 1994. Are herbicide mixtures useful for delaying the rapid evolution of resistance? A case study. Weed Technol. 8:635–648.Google Scholar