Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:35:05.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management of Field Violet (Viola arvensis) in Strawberries (Fragaria × anassa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas J. Doohan
Affiliation:
Dep. Head, N.C. State Univ., Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-76109
Thomas J. Monaco
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., N.C. State Univ., Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-76109
Thomas J. Sheets
Affiliation:
Pestic. Residue Res. Lab., N.C. State Univ., Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-76109

Abstract

Herbicides were evaluated for control of field violet in strawberries in North Carolina and in Nova Scotia, Canada. DCPA at 11.0 kg ai ha−1 and terbacil at 0.5 kg ai ha−1 PRE controlled field violet 80 to 95%. Control with simazine PRE at 1.0 kg ai ha−1 was 70 to 75%. Oxyfluorfen at 0.6 to 1.1 kg ai ha−1 controlled 95 to 100% of the established field violet in dormant strawberries following a mid-winter application. Control with acifluorfen and lactofen applied during mid-winter was 75 to 90%. Oxyfluorfen applied to dormant plantings at rates in excess of 0.60 kg ai ha−1 caused foliar damage; however, yield was not reduced at rates up to 4.5 kg ha−1. Oxyfluorfen at 0.25 kg ha−1 caused severe injury to newly-transplanted strawberries.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1988. Control of field violet in strawberries with acifluorfen and oxyfluorfen. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:233.Google Scholar
2. Ahrens, J. F. 1989. Control of field violet in strawberry plantings. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:149.Google Scholar
3. Bachthaler, V. G., Neuner, F., and Kees, H. 1986. Development of the field pansy (Viola arvensis Murr.) in dependence of soil conditions and agricultural management. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd. 38: 3341.Google Scholar
4. Baskins, J. M. and Baskins, C. C. 1985. The annual dormancy cycle in buried weed seeds—a continuum. BioScience 35:492498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brainerd, E. 1921. The violets of North America. Bulletin 224. Vt. Agric. Exp. Stn. Free Press Printing Company, Burlington, VT. 164 p.Google Scholar
6. Chase, W. R. and Putnam, A. R. 1984. Biology and control of field violet in strawberries. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:147.Google Scholar
7. Doohan, D. J. and Monaco, T. J. 1988. Studies on the biology and control of field violet. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:76.Google Scholar
8. Ervio, L.-R. 1981. The emergence of weeds in the field. Ann. Agric. Fenniae 20:292303.Google Scholar
9. Fogelfors, H. 1977. The competition between barley and five weed species as influenced by MCPA treatment. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 7: 147151.Google Scholar
10. Holm, L., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P., and Plucknett, D. L. 1979. p. 384 in A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
11. Jones, A. 1986. Now is the time to set about strawberry weeds. Grower 109:3133.Google Scholar
12. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (UK). 1982. p. 9 in Weed control in strawberries. ADAS Booklet 2255.Google Scholar
13. Monaco, T. J. 1987. Control of field pansy (Viola rafinesquii Greene) in strawberries. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 27:51.Google Scholar
14. Salisbury, E. J. 1961. Weeds and Aliens. Collins, London. p. 110.Google Scholar