Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:37:49.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Fallow Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids) Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Edward P. Richard Jr.*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Sugarcane Research Unit, P.O. Box 470, Houma, LA 70361

Abstract

Soil- and foliar-applied herbicide treatments were evaluated for the control of seedling johnsongrass in the interim between row formation and the planting of fallowed sugarcane fields approximately 90 d later. Soil-surface applications of metribuzin at 1,680 g ai/ha, pendimethalin plus atrazine each at 2,240 g ai/ha, terbacil at 1,680 g ai/ha, and sulfometuron at 35 and 70 g ai/ha and an incorporated application of trifluralin at 2,240 g ai/ha followed by a surface application of atrazine at 2,240 g/ha did not consistently control seedling johnsongrass until the crop was planted. Rhizome johnsongrass populations originating from seedling johnsongrass that escaped the fallow treatments were lowest in the newly planted crop when sulfometuron at 140 to 280 g/ha was applied to the soil surface and when glyphosate was applied POST at 2,240 g ai/ha, particularly as a sequential treatment alone or as a spot treatment at 2% by volume following applications of metribuzin, terbacil, and pendimethalin or trifluralin with atrazine. Sugarcane shoot populations in the fall after planting and sugar yields at the end of the crop's first growing season were highest where fallow treatments minimized johnsongrass development. These treatments also provided broad spectrum control of other seedling weeds, the residues of which influenced crop development.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ali, A. D., Reagan, T. E., Kitchen, L. M., and Flynn, J. L. 1986. Effects of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) density on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) yield. Weed Sci. 34:381383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Juboory, B. A. and Ahmad, M. M. 1994. The allelopathic effects of plant residues on some weed plants. Arab J. Plant Prot. 12:310.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Controlling weeds in sugarcane. Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Publication 2314 (5M). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 15 p.Google Scholar
Bruff, S. A., Griffin, J. L., Braverman, M. P., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1996. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) response to asulam application. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 16:5866.Google Scholar
Chen, J.C.P. and Chou, C. 1993. Cane Sugar Handbook. 12th ed. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 852867.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., Harrod, J. E., Long, J. D., Levitt, G., and Fitzgerald, D. J. 1981. DPX 5648—a new herbicide for control of johnsongrass and many other weeds. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:214.Google Scholar
Legendre, B. L. and Henderson, M. T. 1972. The history and development of sugar yield calculations. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 2:1018.Google Scholar
Lolas, P. C. and Coble, H. D. 1982. Noncompetitive effects of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) on soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:589593.Google Scholar
Milkylas, J. 1984. Allelopathy of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Acta Agron. Acad. Sci. Hung. 33:423427.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1985. Progressive kill of rhizomatous johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) from repeated treatment with dalapon, MSMA, or asulam. Weed Sci. 33:216221.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1995. Growth and yield of sugarcane as affected by johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) interference. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 15:3240.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr. 1989. Response of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) cultivars to preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:358363.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr. 1990. Timing effects on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with asulam in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Weed Technol. 4:8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr. 1991. Sensitivity of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39:7377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr. 1995. Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) response to simulated fluazifop-P drift. Weed Sci. 43:660665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr., and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) with asulam applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:657667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr., and Kitchen, L. M. 1988. Control of johnsongrass in fallowed sugarcane fields. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 8:1218.Google Scholar
Standifer, L. C. and Thomas, H. 1965. Response of johnsongrass to soil-incorporated trifluralin. Weeds 13:302306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehtje, G., Dickens, R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hajek, B. F. 1987. Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 35:858864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:252256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar