Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:18:28.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hairy Nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) Control in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with Bentazon Plus Additives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charlotte V. Eberlein
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant. Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Mary J. Guttieri
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant. Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
William C. Schaffers
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant. Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to examine hairy nightshade control with, and potato tolerance to, bentazon or bentazon plus nonionic surfactant (NIS), petroleum oil concentrate (POC), methylated seed oil (MSO), BCH-815, or urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN). Bentazon treatments were applied early or late POST. Hairy nightshade control with bentazon at 0.56 kg ha–1 plus POC, MSO, BCH-815, or UAN was equal to or better than bentazon alone at 1.12 kg ha–1 regardless of time of application. Potato injury with bentazon plus additives applied late POST was sometimes greater than with bentazon alone, but use of additives did not reduce potato yield or quality. Yield of US ♯1 tubers was lower when bentazon was applied late POST than when applied early POST in one of two years.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N., Lueschen, W. W., Warnes, D. D., and Nelson, W. W. 1974. Controlling broadleaf weeds in soybeans with bentazon in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 22:136142.Google Scholar
2. Bukovac, M. J. 1976. Herbicide entry into plants. p. 335364. in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides. Volume I. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
3. Friisoe, G. Y., and Martin, A. R. 1985. Enhancement of bentazon activity with liquid fertilizer. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:98.Google Scholar
4. Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., and Bode, L. E. 1986. Influence of adjuvants and application variables on postemergence weed control with bentazon and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:462466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Love, S. L., and Haderlie, L. C. 1991. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar response to bentazon and crop oil. Am. Potato J. 68:331342.Google Scholar
6. Lunsford, J. N., Ascheman, R., Wiley, D., Harader, P., Kinsella, J., Greulach, L., Wisdom, B., and Hutchins, A. 1977. Use of nonphytotoxic oil with bentazon. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control. Conf. 32:54.Google Scholar
7. Nalewaja, J. D., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1977. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) control with bentazon plus additives. Weed Sci. 25:506510.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:504507.Google Scholar
9. Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1977. Responses of potatoes and weeds to herbicides. Wash. State Univ. Bull. No. 844.Google Scholar
10. Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Pereira, W., Crabtree, G., and William, R. D. 1987. Herbicide action on purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:9298.Google Scholar
12. Rogers, R. L., and Crawford, S. H. 1976. Effect of surfactants and rate of application on bentazon phytotoxicity. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 29:67.Google Scholar