Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:27:15.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Glyphosate Plus Bentazon or Quizalofop on Glyphosate-Resistant Canola or Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bo Tao ,
Jingkai Zhou ,
Calvin G. Messersmith  and
John D. Nalewaja
Bo Tao
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Jingkai Zhou*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Calvin G. Messersmith
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jing.zhou@ndsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effect of glyphosate on efficacy of bentazon for glyphosate-resistant (GR) canola control and of quizalofop for GR corn control. Control also was evaluated for glyphosate plus bentazon on wild buckwheat and wheat and glyphosate plus quizalofop on velvetleaf. Glyphosate plus bentazon synergistically controlled GR canola and wild buckwheat but were antagonistic for wheat control. Glyphosate plus quizalofop were additive for control of GR corn and velvetleaf. Inert ingredients in glyphosate formulations, i.e., cationic surfactant, NH4, or K, contributed to glyphosate synergism of bentazon, but the major contribution came from glyphosate itself. Efficacy of glyphosate plus bentazon on GR canola was enhanced by ammonium nitrate (AMN), ammonium sulfate (AMS), nonionic surfactant (NIS), or silicone surfactant (SiS) but was slightly decreased by methylated seed oil (MSO) or petroleum oil concentrate. AMN, AMS, NIS, and SiS partially overcame the antagonism of bentazon to glyphosate for wheat control. NIS enhanced phytotoxicity of glyphosate plus quizalofop to GR corn and velvetleaf, but the enhancement was less than by SiS or MSO to GR corn and SiS or AMS to velvetleaf.

Keywords

Bentazonglyphosatequizalofopvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti (L.) Medic. ABUTHwild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. POLCOcanola, Brassica napus L.corn, Zea mays L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Adjuvantantagonismglyphosate-resistant volunteer cropsynergism
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 97 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 31:163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 15:20–22.Google Scholar
Flint, J. L. and Barrett, M. 1989. Antagonism of glyphosate toxicity to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) by 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Sci. 37:700–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. J., Hart, C. A., and Jones, C. A. 2000. Plants as sources of cations antagonistic to glyphosate activity. Pest. Manag. Sci. 56:351–358.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8:129–133.Google Scholar
Leaper, C. and Holloway, P. J. 2000. Adjuvants and glyphosate activity. Pest. Manag. Sci. 56:313–319.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:12–21.Google Scholar
Monsanto, , 2005. History of Monsanto's glyphosate herbicides. http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/layout/sci_tech/crop_chemicals/scipubs.asp#generalinfo.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1991. Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39:622–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1993. Influence of diammonium sulfate and other salts on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Pestic. Sci. 38:77–84.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A., O'Donovan, J. T., and Hamman, W. M. 1981. Influence of nonionic surfactants, ammonium sulfate, water quality and spray volume on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 2003. Substitutes for ammonium sulfate as additives with glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 17:576–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, M. J., Legere, A., Pageau, D., Lajeunesse, J., and Warwick, S. 2002. The frequency and persistence of volunteer canola (Brassica napus) in Quebec cropping systems. Weed Technol. 16:433–439.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R., Thomas, G., Leeson, J., Andrews, T., and Brown, K. 2002. What's up?—preliminary results from the 2002 Manitoba survey of weeds in cereal and oilseed crops. Proc. Manitoba Agron. Conf. 3:109–115.Google Scholar
Wells, B. H. and Appleby, A. P. 1992. Lactofen increases glyphosate-stimulated shikimate production in little mallow (Malva parviflora). Weed Sci. 40:171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B. G., Knepp, A. W., Wax, L. M., and Hart, S. E. 2003. Glyphosate translocation in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in response to ammonium sulfate. Weed Sci. 51:151–156.Google Scholar