Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:42:30.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Integrated Polyethylene and Cover Crop Mulch, Conservation Tillage, and Herbicide Application on Weed Control, Yield, and Economic Returns in Watermelon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Andrew J. Price ,
Jacob P. Williams ,
Leah A. Duzy ,
J. Scott McElroy ,
Elizabeth A. Guertal  and
Steve Li
Andrew J. Price*
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Auburn, AL, USA
Jacob P. Williams
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Leah A. Duzy
Affiliation:
Former Agricultural Economist, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Auburn, AL, USA
J. Scott McElroy
Affiliation:
Professor, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Elizabeth A. Guertal
Affiliation:
Professor, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Steve Li
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Andrew J. Price, Plant Physiologist, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832 (andrew.price@ars.usda.gov)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 3-yr watermelon experiment was established in fall 2013 to evaluate cover crop, polyethylene mulch, tillage, and herbicide application components for weed control, yield, and profitability. Conservation tillage, either with a cereal rye cover crop alone or integrated with polyethylene mulch, was compared to the standard industry practice of conventional tillage with bedded polyethylene mulch. The study also used a non-bedded conventional tillage system without polyethylene to determine polyethylene and cover crop residue effects. Within each of the four systems, herbicide treatments comprised halosulfuron applied (1) at 26.3 g ai ha–1 PRE, (2) at 26.3 g ai ha–1 POST, or (3) sequentially at 26.3 g ai ha–1 PRE and POST. Each system also had a nontreated control. In addition, clethodim was applied in all plots twice POST at 140 g ai ha–1, except for nontreated in each system. In 2014, polyethylene or cereal rye cover crop effectively controlled tall morningglory, coffee senna, and carpetweed early season in nontreated plots, whereas the integration of the two was effective at controlling common purslane. Tall morningglory and purslane control was insufficient late season regardless of production system and herbicide application. In 2015, polyethylene effectively controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose, sicklepod, and arrowleaf sida early season in nontreated plots. Yellow nutsedge control was insufficient late season regardless of production system and herbicide application. Utilizing sequential halosulfuron applications did not increase weed control over PRE or POST alone in all years. Polyethylene use resulted in yields higher than systems without in all years. Across all 3 yr, net returns were highest for polyethylene mulch systems. The results of this experiment underscore the need for more progress in developing integrated conservation systems for watermelon production. Effective herbicides, low-disturbance cultivation, and/or hand weeding are most likely the key to success in conservation specialty crop systems.

Keywords

Michael WalshUniversity of SydneyClethodimhalosulfuronarrowleaf sida, Sida rhombifolia L.cereal rye, Secale cerale L.carpetweed, Mollugo verticillata L.coffee senna, Senna occidentalis (L.) Linkcommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L.cutleaf eveningprimrose, Oenothera laciniata Hilllarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barnebyyellow nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L.tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Rothwatermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & NakaiCereal ryecover cropsconservation tillagepolyethylene
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 623 - 632
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdul-Baki, AA, Teasdale, JR, Korcak, R, Chitwood, DJ, Huettel, RN (1996) HortScience 31:65–69 Google Scholar
Ashford, DL, Reeves, DW (2003) Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:37–45 Google Scholar
Balkcom, KS, Arriaga, FJ, Van Santen, E (2013) Conservation systems to enhance soil carbon sequestration in the Southeast U.S. Coastal Plain. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1774–1783. doi: (doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0034) Google Scholar
Buker, RS, Stall, WM, Olson, SM, Schilling, DG (2003) Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with direct-seeded and transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Technol 17(4):751–754 Google Scholar
Coolong, G, Boyhan, TE (2017) Commercial Tomato Production Handbook. University of Georgia bulletin 1312. https://secure.caes.uga.edu/extension/publications/files/pdf/B%201312_6.PDF Google Scholar
Frans, R, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant response to weed control practices. Pages 37–38 in Camper ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd edn. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Franzluebbers, AJ, Langdale, GW, Schomberg, HH (1999) Soil carbon, nitrogen, and aggregation in response to type and frequency of tillage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:349–355 Google Scholar
Keshavarzpour, F, Rashidi, M (2008) Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of watermelon (Citrullus vulgairs). World Appl Sci J 3(3):359–364 Google Scholar
Kornecki, TS, Arriaga, FJ (2011) Impact of different cover crops and types of transplanter mounted subsoiler shanks on tomato yield. Hortscience. 46(5):715–720 Google Scholar
Lamont, W Jr (1993) Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. HortTechnol 3(1):35–39 Google Scholar
Lu, W, Duthie, JA, Roberts, BW, Taylor, MJ, Edelson, JV (2003) Partial budget analysis of effects of crop management intensity on profitability of three watermelon cultivars. Journal of Vegetable Crop Production 9(1):49–71. doi: (doi: 10.1300/J068v09n01_06) Google Scholar
Madden, NM, Mitchell, JP, Lanini, WT, Cahn, MD, Herrero, EV, Park, S, Temple, SR, Van Horn, M (2004) Evaluation of conservation tillage and cover crop systems for organic processing tomato production. HortTechnol 14:243–250 Google Scholar
Masiunas, JB, Weston, LA, Weller, SC (1995) The impact of rye cover crops on weed populations in a tomato cropping system. Weed Sci 43:318–323 Google Scholar
McIntosh, M S (1983) Analysis of combined experiments. Agron J 75:153–155 Google Scholar
Mitchell, CC, Huluka, G (2012) Nutrient recommendation tables for Alabama crops. Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 324b. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, 84 p. http://www.aces.edu/anr/soillab/forms/documents/ay-324B.pdf Google Scholar
Mitchell, JP, Southard, RJ, Madden, NM, Klonsky, KM, Baker, JB, DeMoura, R, Horwath, WR, Munk, DS, Wroble, JF, Hembree, KJ, Wallender, WW (2008) Transition to conservation tillage evaluated in San Joaquin Valley cotton and tomato rotations. California. Agriculture 62(2):74–79 Google Scholar
Monday, TA, Lawrence, DA, Foshee, WG III, Wehtje, GR, Gilliam, CH (2015) Pre and post herbicides in combination with a rye cover crop for control of yellow nutsedge and pigweed in watermelon. J Veg Sci 21(3):264–271 Google Scholar
Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR (1998) Critical weed-free period for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Sci 46:530–532 Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agriculture Statistics Service (2015) United States Department of Agriculture. Quick stats 2.0. http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov Google Scholar
Roberts, W, Duthie, J, Edelson, J, Cartwright, B, Shrefler, J, Roe, N (1999) Limitations and possibilities for some conservation tillage systems with vegetable crops in the Southern Plains of the United States. HortTechnol 9(3):359–365 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Anderson, L, Hamson, AR (1995) Growth analysis of watermelon plants grown with mulches and rowcovers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120:1001–1009 Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Abdul Baki, AA (1997) Growth analysis of tomatoes in black plastic and hairy vetch production systems. Hortscience 32:659–663 Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2016 Survey of the Most Common and Troublesome Weeds in Broadleaf Crops, Fruits & Vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016_Weed_Survey_Final.xlsx. Accessed: November 25, 2016Google Scholar
Walters, SA (2009) Influence of plant density and cultivar on mini triploid watermelon yield and fruit quality. HortTechnol 19:553–557 Google Scholar
Zuazo, VHD, Pleguezuelo, CRR (2008) Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers. A review. Agron Sustainable Dev 28:65–86 Google Scholar