Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:28:10.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of BAS-145-138 as an Antidote for Sulfonylurea Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert M. Devlin  and
Irena I. Zbiec
Robert M. Devlin
Affiliation:
Lab. Exp. Biol., Cranberry Exp. Stn., Univ. Mass., East Wareham, MA 02538
Irena I. Zbiec
Affiliation:
Acad. Agric., Szczecin, Poland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

BAS-145-138 considerably muted the herbicidal effect of the sulfonylurea herbicides on corn. Decreases of 54 and 52% in shoot fresh and dry weight caused by 10 μM chlorsulfuron were countered almost completely by 1.5 mM BAS-145-138 with only a 10% loss in fresh weight and a 3% loss in dry weight. Similar strong antidotal influence by BAS-145-138 on chlorimuron was observed. BAS-145-138 partially protected corn against sulfometuron. Shoot fresh weight of corn treated with 0.2 μM sulfometuron was inhibited 88%, whereas adding 0.5 or 1.5 mM BAS-145-138 reduced inhibition to 52 and 24%, respectively.

Keywords

BAS-145-138, 1-dichloroacetylhexahydro-3,3,8 α-trimethyl-pyrrolo-(1,2-α)-pyrimidin-6-(2H)-onechlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidchlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamidesulfometuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfony]benzoic acidcorn, Zea mays L.Antidotechlorimuronchlorsulfuronsulfometuron
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 337 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., ed. Herbicides. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Mansager, D. 1987. 1,8-naphthalic anhydride/auxin protection against chlorsulfuron inhibition of corn seedling growth. p. 161–168 in Greenhalgh, R. and Roberts, T. R., ed. Pesticide Science and Biotechnology. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford.Google Scholar
3. Fuerst, E. P., and Gronwald, J. W. 1986. Induction of rapid metabolism of metolachlor in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) shoots by CGA-92194 and other antidotes. Weed Sci. 34:354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fuerst, E. P., Ahrens, W. H., and Lamoureux, G. L. 1988. Mode of action of dichloroacetamide herbicide antidote. Plant Physiol. Abstr. 26:798.Google Scholar
5. Gronwald, J. W., Fuerst, E. P., Eberlein, C. V., and Egli, M. A. 1987. Effect of herbicide antidotes on glutathione content and glutathione S-transferase activity of sorghum shoots. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 29:66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hatzios, K. K. 1983. Herbicide antidotes: Development, chemistry, and mode of action. Adv. Agron. 36:265–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hatzios, K. K. 1984. Potential safeners for protecting sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)Moench.] against chlorsulfuron, fluazifop-butyl and sethoxydim. Weed Res. 24:249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hatzios, K. K. 1984. Interactions between selected herbicides and protectants on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hatzios, K. K., and Penner, D. 1982. Metabolism of Herbicides in Higher Plants. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis.Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, O. L. 1962. Chemical seed treatments as herbicide antidotes. Weed Sci. 10:322–323.Google Scholar
11. Hoffman, O. L. 1969. Chemical antidotes for EPTC on corn. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 12.Google Scholar
12. Lamoureux, G. L., and Rusness, D. G. 1983. Malonylcysteine conjugates as end products of glutathione conjugate metabolism in plants. p. 295–300 in Miyamoto, J. and Kearney, P. C., ed. IUPAC Pesticide Chemistry: Human Welfare and the Environment. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
13. Lay, M. M., and Casida, J. E. 1976. Dichloroacetamide antidotes enhance thiocarbamate sulfoxide detoxification by elevating corn root glutathione content and glutathione S-transferase activity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 6:442–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Leavitt, J.R.C., and Penner, D. 1979. In vitro conjugation of glutathione and other thiols with acetanilide herbicides and EPTC sulfoxide and the action of the herbicide antidote R-25788. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mozer, T. J., Tiemeir, D. C., and Jaworski, E. G. 1983. Purification and characterization of corn glutathione-S-transferase. Biochem. 22:1068–1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. O'Leary, N. F., and Prendeville, G. N. 1985. Uptake and phytotoxicity of chlorsulfuron in Zea mays L. in the presence of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride. Weed Res. 25:331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Parker, C., Richardson, W. G., and West, T. M. 1980. Potential for extending the selectivity of DPX-4189 by use of herbicide safeners. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 1:15–21.Google Scholar
18. Sweetser, P. B. 1985. Safening of sulfonylurea herbicides to cereal crops: Mode of herbicide antidote action. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Congr. Weeds 3:1147–1154.Google Scholar