Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:01:01.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry W. Mitich
Larry W. Mitich*
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“… To the ground, With solemn adoration, down they cast Their crowns, inwove with amaranth and gold. Immortal amaranth, a flower which once In Paradise, fast by the tree of life, Began to bloom.”

–John Milton (1608–1676), Paradise Lost

Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), one of the New World's major weeds, was described in 1753 by Carolus Linnaeus in Species Plantarum. Over three decades later (1789), the genu wa placed in Amaranthaceae by Antoine Laurent de Jussieu (1748–1836) (Britton and Brown 1898). Amaranthaceae belongs to Centrospermae, a group of familie that contain betalain pigments instead of the anthocyanins found in most other angiosperms; it is closely related to Chenopodiaceae (Heywood 1993).

Type
Intriguing World of Weeds
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 199 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Apogino, G. A. 1957. Pigweed seeds dated oldest U.S. food grain. Sci. News Letter (Wash.) 72:345.Google Scholar
Barton, L. V., 1962. The germination of weed seeds. Weeds 10:174–182.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W. S., 1930. The Indiana Weed Book. Indianapolis: Nature Publishing. 191 p.Google Scholar
Britton, N. L., and Brown, A. 1898. An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions. Volume I. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 612 p.Google Scholar
Brummitt, R. K., 1992. Vascular Plant Families and Genera. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 804 p.Google Scholar
Campbell, E. G., 1924. Nitrogen content of weeds. Bot. Gaz. 78:103–115.Google Scholar
Darlington, H. T., and Steinbauer, G. P. 1961. The eighty-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 48:321–325.Google Scholar
Darlington, W., 1859. American Weeds and Useful Plants. New York: Orange Judd. 460 p.Google Scholar
Feltner, K. C., 1970. The ten worst weeds of field crops. 5. Pigweed. Crops Soils 23:13–14.Google Scholar
Frankton, C., and Mulligan, G. A. 1970. Weeds of Canada. Ottawa, ON: Queen's Printer. 217 p.Google Scholar
Gates, F. C., 1941. Weeds in Kansas. Topeka, KS: Kansas State Board of Agriculture. 360 p.Google Scholar
Georgia, A., 1942. Manual of Weeds. New York: Macmillan. 593 p.Google Scholar
Gledhill, D., 1989. The Names of Plants. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. 202 p.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. D., and Matsumura, Y. 1967. Edible Native Plants of the Rocky Mountains. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. 392 p.Google Scholar
Hauptli, H., and Jain, S. K. 1978. Biosystematics and agronomic potential of some weedy and cultivated amaranths. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52:177–185.Google Scholar
Heywood, V. H., 1993. Flowering Plants of the World. New York: Oxford University Press. 335 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P., and Plucknett, D. L. 1979. A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. New York: J. Wiley. 391 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Hyam, R., and Pankhurst, P. 1995. Plants and Their Names, A Concise Dictionary. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press. 545 p.Google Scholar
King, L. J., 1966. Weeds of the World. New York: Interscience Publishers. 526 p.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, J. M., 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 626 p.Google Scholar
Mabberley, D. J., 1989. The Plant-Book. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. 706 p.Google Scholar
Marten, G. C., and Anderson, R. N. 1975. Forage nutritive value and palatability of twelve common annual weeds. Crop Sci. 15:821–827.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M. F., Sweet, R. D., and Shannon, S. 1976. Weeds and crop growth Chenopodium album, Amaranthus retroflexus, kidney beans. Proc. Annu. Meet. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:105–117.Google Scholar
Montgomery, F. H., 1964. Weeds of Canada and the Northern United States. Toronto: Ryerson Press. 266 p.Google Scholar
Muenscher, W. C., 1955. Weeds. New York: Macmillan. 560 p.Google Scholar
Pammel, L. H., and King, C. M. 1926. The Weed Flora of Iowa. Des Moines, IA: State of Iowa. 715 p.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. D., 1950. The grain amaranths: a survey of their history and classification. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 37:561–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D., 1967. The grain amaranth and their relatives: a revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 54:103–137.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., and Weiner, E.S.C. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford, Great Britain: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, E. R., 1968. All About Weeds. New York: Dover Publications. 333 p.Google Scholar
Thornton, B. J., and Harrington, H. D. n.d. Weeds of Colorado. Agricultural Experiment Station, Bull. 514-S. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University. 218 p.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E., and McWilliams, E. L. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 44. Amaranthus retroflexus L., A. powellii S. and A. hybridus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:1215–1234.Google Scholar
Woo, M. L., 1919. Chemical constituents of Amaranthus retroflexus . Bot. Gaz. 68:313–344.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L., 1989. Words and Words. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. 125 p.Google Scholar