Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-9z9qw Total loading time: 0.229 Render date: 2021-07-29T12:49:26.640Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Interference and Control in Seed Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James R. Moyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
G. Bruce Schaalje
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1

Abstract

Alfalfa seed yield and quackgrass density were measured in seven irrigated fields in southern Alberta to assess the effect of quackgrass on seed yield. Six herbicides were tested to determine their effect on quackgrass growth and accompanying alfalfa seed yield. The effect of quackgrass on seed yield was adequately described by a hyperbolic model. Quackgrass densities of 50 and 100 heads per m2 reduced seed yields by 56 and 74%, respectively. The economic threshold density was 3 quackgrass heads per m2. The most effective herbicide treatments, quizalofop and propaquizafop, resulted in good initial quackgrass suppression and yield increases similar to those predicted by the hyperbolic model.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1992. Guide to crop protection in Alberta. Part 1. Chemical. Agdex 606-1. Alberta Agriculture, Edmonton, AB. p. 228.Google Scholar
2. Cousens, R., Brain, P., O'Donovan, J. T., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35: 720725.Google Scholar
3. Gallant, A. R. 1987. Nonlinear Statistical Models. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York. p. 5556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Goplen, G. P. 1969. Wide row spacing for alfalfa seed production is important. Can. Dep. Agric. Forage Notes 16(1):1819.Google Scholar
5. Hanna, M. R., Bergen, P., Charnetski, W. A., Richards, K. W., and Moyer, J. R. 1987. Management of alfalfa for seed production in southern Alberta. Alberta Alfalfa Seed Committee, Lethbridge, AB. p. 8.Google Scholar
6. Ivany, J. A., Leroux, G., and Sanderson, J. B. 1990. Survey of quackgrass importance and research priority, March 1989. p. 115 in Proc. Quackgrass Symp. Quackgrass Action Committee. C. J. Swanton, Chairman, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar
7. Linscott, D. L. and Vaughan, R. 1989. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) seed production. Weed Technol. 3:102104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Malik, N. and Leach, D. 1989. Repeated fall vs spring applications of residual herbicides in established alfalfa, Shellbrook, SK. p. 34 in Res. Rep., Vol. 3, Expert Committee on Weeds, Regina, SK.Google Scholar
9. Malik, N. and Moskal, N. 1990. Control of perennial grass weeds in established alfalfa at Arborfield Sask. p. 11 in Res. Rep., Vol. 3, Expert Committee on Weeds, Regina, SK.Google Scholar
10. Moyer, J. R. 1990. Control of weeds in forage crops. Legumes. p. 287300 in Report of the Research Appraisal and Planning Committee, Expert Committee on Weeds, Western Section, Regina, SK.Google Scholar
11. Moyer, J. R., Richards, K. W., and Schaalje, G. B. 1991. Effect of plant density and herbicide application on alfalfa seed and weed yields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:481491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Moyer, J. R., Schaalje, G. B., and Bergen, P. 1991. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seed yield loss due to Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Technol. 5:723728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. O'Donovan, J. T. 1991. Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) interference in Canola (Brassica campestris). Weed Sci. 39:397401.Google Scholar
14. O'Sullivan, P. A., Kossatz, V. C., Weiss, G. M., and Dew, D. A. 1982. An approach to estimating yield loss of barley due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:725731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Peschken, D. P., Thomas, A. G., and Wise, R. F. 1983. Loss in yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus, B. campestris) caused by perennial sow thistle (Sonchus arvensis) in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Weed Sci. 31:740744.Google Scholar
16. Peters, E. J. and Linscott, D. L. 1988. Weeds and weed control. p. 705735 in Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement. Hanson, A. A., Barnes, D. K., and Hill, R. R., eds. Agronomy no. 29. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
17. Rawlings, J. O. and Cure, W. W. 1985. The Weibull function as a dose-response model to describe ozone effects on crop yield. Crop. Sci. 25: 807814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Rincker, C. M., Rincker, V.L., Brown, D. E., and Johansen, C. A. 1988. Seed production practices. p. 9851022 in Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement. Hanson, A. A., Barnes, D. K., and Hill, R. R., eds. Agronomy no. 29. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
19. Rioux, R. 1982. Measuring quackgrass interference in barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. SAS Institute. 1988. p. 675712 in SAS/STAT™ User's Guide. Release 6.03 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
21. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Toronto. 481 p.Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Interference and Control in Seed Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Interference and Control in Seed Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Interference and Control in Seed Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *