Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T21:33:37.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Reduction in North America: In Canada, an Opportunity for Motivation and Growth in Weed Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Allan S. Hamill
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada, Harrow, ON, Canada, NOR 1GO
Gordon A. Surgeoner
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1
Wayne P. Roberts
Affiliation:
Pest Manage. Div., Plant Industry Branch, Ont. Min. of Agr. Food, Guelph, ON

Abstract

Pesticide registration in Canada is a Federal responsibility. Authority to recommend and use a pesticide often is Provincially controlled. A survey on “the status of pesticide reduction” within the various provinces of Canada revealed that only 3 of 10 had a policy to reduce pesticide use. In Ontario is an example of a successful non-mandatory program toward the reduced use of pesticides. A coordinated effort among government, industry, and growers has resulted in increased research, education, and extension for pesticide use. Licensing for sellers and users of pesticides has been effective in assisting the reduction of active ingredient pesticide sales.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Archibald, B. A. 1990. Review of data requirements for the registration of pesticides in Canada and the United States. Submission to Federal Pesticide Registration Review Team, Ottawa, Ontario. 38 p.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1990. Recommendations for a revised federal pest management regulatory system. Communications Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1991. Agricultural Statistics for Ontario. Statistical Services Unit, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario. 156 p.Google Scholar
4. Anonymous. 1992. Our farm environmental agenda—progress report. P. 4 in InfoSOURCE, Soil and Water Conservation Information Bureau, Guelph, Ontario.Google Scholar
5. Anonymous. 1992. Our farm environmental agenda. Ontario Federation of Agriculture, Toronto, Ontario. 26 p.Google Scholar
6. Dyck, B. 1992. P. 19 in 1991-1992 Annual Report. Crop Protection Institute, Etobicoke, Ontario.Google Scholar
7. Hough, K. 1992. 1992 OCPA pesticide and fertilizer price survey results. Ontario Corn Producer. 8(6): 16.Google Scholar
8. Kelner, S. 1992. Ontario pesticide education program. Ridgetown College of Agricultural Technology, Ridgetown, Ontario. 13 p.Google Scholar
9. Surgeoner, G. A. and Roberts, W. 1992. Reducing pesticide use by 50% in the province of Ontario: challenges and progress. P. 206222 in Pimentel, D. and Lehman, H., eds. The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar