Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:57:51.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting Closer to Breeding for Competitive Ability and the Role of Allelopathy—An Example from Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Maria Olofsdotter
Maria Olofsdotter*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Weed Science, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Agrovej 10, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The involvement of allelopathy in various crop–weed competition studies has been suggested by several authors, but its significance has been demonstrated with varying success. It is extremely difficult to unambiguously demonstrate allelopathy in nature because of the complexity of plant interference and its relationship to soil chemistry. However, with an increased understanding of the chemical processes occurring in the agroecosystem, genetic mapping of quantitative traits, and the ability to identify allelochemicals, an effort should now be directed toward understanding the mechanisms for allelopathy, as well as trying to optimize an allelopathic effect to produce more competitive crops. The approach used for rice allelopathy research can be used as a general framework for understanding how genetically encoded traits affect the competitive ability of plants. This framework requires the involvement of a range of scientists from multidisciplinary research areas with the overall objective of optimizing competitive ability in crops. Such research efforts could reduce dependency on herbicides and thus increase the sustainability of weed management practices. This paper aims to illustrate the importance of allelopathy for crop competitive ability and to identify a framework suitable for result-oriented collaborative research toward breeding for competitive ability in crops.

Keywords

DNA, deoxyribonucleic acidIRRI, International Rice Research InstituteQTL, quantitative trait locirice, Oryza sativa L.Competitionplant interferenceallelopathic cultivar, weeds
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 798 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1996. Something New Out of Africa. Bouaké, Ivory Coast: West African Rice Development Association Annual Rep. 1996. Features. pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. Impact of Varietal Improvement in West African Crop Ecologies. Bouaké, Ivory Coast: West African Rice Res. Brief 3. 2 p.Google Scholar
Caton, B. P., Mortimer, A. M., Foin, T. C., Hill, J. E., Gibson, K. D., and Fischer, A. J. 1999. Weed morphology effects on competitiveness for light in direct-seeded rice. Proc. 17th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. Volume IA. pp. 116–120.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. 1993. Weed Suppression in Cereal Varieties. Ph.D. dissertation. Min. Agric. Statens Planeavlsforsøg, Denmark. No. 1. 104 p.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. 1995. Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties. Weed Res. 35: 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtois, B. and Olofsdotter, M. 1998. Incorporating the allelopathy trait in upland rice breeding programs. In Olofsdotter, M., ed. Allelopathy in Rice. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Dilday, R. H., Nastasi, P., Lin, J., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1991. Allelopathic activity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) against ducksalad (Heteranthera limosa (sw.) Willd.) In Hanson, J. D., Shaffer, M. J., Ball, D. A., and Cole, C. V., eds. Symposium Proceedings on Sustainable Agriculture for the Great Plains. USDA, ARS-89. pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
Dilday, R. H., Yan, W. G., Moldenhauer, K.A.K., and Gravois, K. A. 1998. Allelopathic activity in rice for controlling major aquatic weeds. In Olofsdotter, M., ed. Allelopathy in Rice. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O., Rimando, A. M., Dayan, F. E. et al. 2000. Strategies for the discovery of bioactive phytochemicals. In Bidlack, W. R., Omaye, S. T., Meskin, M. S., and Topham, D.K.W., eds. Phytochemicals as Bioactive Agents. Lancaster, PA: Techonomic Publishing. pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Estabroch, E. M. and Yoder, J. L. 1998. Plant-plant communication: rhizosphere signaling between parasitic angiosperms and their hosts. Plant Physiol. 116: 1–7.Google Scholar
Fujii, Y. 1992. The potential biological control of paddy weeds with allelopathy: allelopathic effect of some rice varieties. In Proceedings International Symposium on Biological Control and Integrated Management of Paddy and Aquatic Weeds in Asia. Tsukuba, Japan: National Agricultural Research Center. pp. 305–320.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Foin, T. C., and Hill, J. E. 1998. The relative importance of root and shoot competition between water-seeded rice and Echinochloa phyllopogon . Weed Res. 39: 181–190.Google Scholar
Grace, J. B. 1990. On relationships between plant traits and competitive ability. In Grace, J. B. and Tilman, D., eds. Perspectives on Plant Competition. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1956. The evolution of weeds in relation to the resistance to herbicides. Proc. 3rd Br. Weed Control Conf. (Blackpool) 1: 179–188 (in Harper 1977 citation).Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press. pp. 347–381.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. B., Courtois, B., Olofsdotter, M., Shen, L., Mauleon, R. P., and Li, Z. 2001. Locating genes controlling rice allelopathic effects against Echinochloa crus-galli . Agron. J. In press.Google Scholar
Jordan, N. R. and Jannink, J. L. 1997. Assessing the practical importance of weed evolution: a research agenda. Weed Res. 37: 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N., Kelrick, M., Brooks, J., and Kenerk, W. 1999. Biorational management tactics to select against triazine-resistant Amatanthus hybridus: a field trial. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 123–132.Google Scholar
Kim, K. U. and Shin, D. H. 1998. Rice allelopathy research in Korea. In Olofsdotter, M., ed. Proceedings of the Workshop on Allelopathy in Rice, 25-27 November 1996, Manila, the Phillipines. International Rice Research Institute. pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
Kirk, G.J.D., Santos, E. E., and Santos, M. B. 1999. Phosphate solubilization by organic anion excretion from rice growing in aerobic soil: rates of excretion and decomposition, effects on rhizosphere pH, and effects on phosphate solubility and uptake. New Phytol. 142: 185–200.Google Scholar
Kropff, M. J., Lotz, L.A.P., Weaver, S. E., Bos, H. J., Wallinga, J., and Migo, T. 1995. A two parameter model for prediction of crop loss by weed competition from early observations of relative leaf area of the weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126: 329–346.Google Scholar
Maneechote, C., Krasalsindhu, P., and Suwanketnikon, R. 1999. Allelopathic activity of upland rice in Thailand. Proceedings of the 17th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. p. 11 (Abstract).Google Scholar
McCouch, S. R. and Tanksley, S. D. 1991. Development and use of restriction fragment length polymorphism in rice breeding and genetics. In Khush, G. S. and Toenniessen, G. H., eds. Rice Biotechnology. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. pp. 109–133.Google Scholar
McCully, M. E. 1999. Roots in soil: unearthing the complexities of roots and their rhizosphere. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 695–718.Google Scholar
Moolsri, S., Kow-in, P., Chaitep, W., Courtois, B., and Mortimer, M. 1999. Rice-weed competitiveness. Proceedings of the 17th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. Volume IB. pp. 721–726.Google Scholar
Mortimer, M., Caton, B. P., and Hill, J. E. 1999. On ecological issues in the development of sustainable weed management. Proceedings of the 17th Asian-Pacific Weed Service Society Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. Volume IA. pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
Navarez, D. and Olofsdotter, M. 1996. Relay seeding procedure as screening method in allelopathy research. Proc. 2nd Int. Weed Control Conf. 4: 1285–1290.Google Scholar
Olofsdotter, M. and Navarez, D. 1996. Allelopathic rice in Echinochloa crus-galli control. Proc. 2nd Int. Weed Control Conf. 4: 1175–1182.Google Scholar
Olofsdotter, M., Navarez, D., and Rebulanan, M. 1997. Rice allelopathy—where are we and how far can we get? Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds. 1: 99–104.Google Scholar
Olofsdotter, M., Navarez, D., Rebulanan, M., and Streibig, J. C. 1999. Weed suppressing rice cultivars—does allelopathy play a role? Weed Res. 39: 441–454.Google Scholar
Olofsdotter, M., Rebulanan, M., Madrid, A., Dali, W., Navarez, D., and Olk, D. C. 2001. Why phenolic acids are unlikely allelochemicals in rice. J. Chem. Ecol. In press.Google Scholar
Pheng, S., Adkins, S., Olofsdotter, M., and Jahn, G. 1999. Allelopathic effects of rice (Oryza sativa L.) on the growth of awnless barnyard grass [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link]: a new form for weed management. Camb. J. Agric. 2: 42–49.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A. 1992. Flavanoids: plant signals to soil microbes. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 26: 201–231.Google Scholar
Ranasinghe, L. L. and Crabtree, G. D. 1999. Plant characteristics associated with rice (Oryza sativa L.)-barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv.) competition. Proceedings of the 17th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. Volume IA. pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
Rimando, A. M., Dayan, F. E., Czarnota, M. A., Weston, L. A., and Duke, S. O. 1998. A new photosystem II electron transfer inhibitor from Sorghum bicolor . J. Nat. Prod. 61: 927–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimando, A. M., Olofsdotter, M., and Duke, S. O. 2001. Searching for rice allelochemicals. Agron. J. In press.Google Scholar
Seavers, G. P. and Wright, K. J. 1999. Crop canopy development and structure influence weed suppression. Weed Res. 39: 319–328.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. W. and Doust, J. L. 1993. Introduction to plant population biology. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science. pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Dayan, F. E., Rimando, A. M., and Duke, S. O. 1999. Joint action of natural and synthetic photosystem II inhibitors. Pestic. Sci. 55: 137–146.Google Scholar
Tuner, R. G. 1969. Heavy metal tolerance in plants. In Rorison, I. H., ed. Ecological Aspects of Mineral Nutrition in Plants. 9th Symposium the British Ecological Society. pp. 399–410 (in Harper 1977 citation).Google Scholar
Waller, G. R. and Einhellig, F. A. 1999. Overview of allelopathy in agriculture, forestry and ecology. In Chou, C. H., Waller, G. R., and Reinhardt, C., eds. Biochemistry and Allelopathy: From Organisms to Ecosystems in the Pacific. Taipei, Taiwan: Academica Sinica. pp. 221–245.Google Scholar
Zhang, H. and Forde, B. G. 1998. An arabidopsis-MADS-box gene that controls nutrient induced changes in root architecture. Science. 279: 407–409.Google Scholar