Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:35:19.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Additives on Efficacy, Uptake, and Translocation of Chlorimuron Ethyl Ester

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Fielding  and
Edward W. Stoller
Robert J. Fielding
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., 1102 S. Goodwin Ave.
Edward W. Stoller
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron., Univ. Ill., 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effects of a 28% N solution containing urea and ammonium nitrate (28% UAN) and a nonionic surfactant on efficacy, uptake, and translocation of chlorimuron ethyl ester in soybean and broadleaf weeds were investigated. Chlorimuron applied postemergence at 8.8 and 13 g ai/ha with either nonionic surfactant at 0.25% (v/v), 28% UAN at 9.4 L/ha, or nonionic surfactant plus 28% UAN controlled weeds better than without additives. Chlorimuron with nonionic surfactant and with 28% UAN controlled weeds similarly but with 28% UAN injured soybeans least. Chlorimuron with nonionic surfactant plus 28% UAN controlled velvetleaf best but injured soybeans most. Less than 2% of applied 14C-chlorimuron was absorbed in velvetleaf 84 h after treatment (HAT) when no additive was present, but adding nonionic surfactant, 28% UAN, and nonionic surfactant plus 28% UAN resulted in 21, 9, and 32% uptake, respectively, 84 HAT. Nonionic surfactant plus 28% UAN also increased translocation (primarily acropetal) of the 14C. Adding 28% UAN increased 14C-chlorimuron uptake in velvetleaf grown at low fertility but had no effect under high fertility.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., ‘Williams 82’velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ♯3 ABUTHSurfactant28% urea ammonium nitrateadditive
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 264 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Babiker, A.G.T., and Duncan, H. J. 1975. Penetration of bracken fronds by amitrole as influenced by pre-spraying conditions, surfactants and other additives. Weed Res. 15:123–127.Google Scholar
2. Blair, A. M. 1975. The addition of ammonium salts or a phosphate ester to herbicides to control Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 15:101–105.Google Scholar
3. Brady, H. A. 1970. Ammonium nitrate and phosphoric acid increase 2,4,5-T absorption by tree leaves. Weed Sci. 18:204–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Claus, J. S. 1987. Chlorimuron-Ethyl (Classic)®. A new broadleaf postemergence herbicide in soybean. Weed Technol. 1:114–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and Venice mallow (Hibiscus triomum) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
6. Foy, C. L., and Smith, L. W. 1969. The role of surfactants in modifying the activity of herbicidal sprays. p. 55–59 in Pesticidal Formulations Research. Am. Chem. Soc., Adv. Chem. Ser. 86, Washington, Dc.Google Scholar
7. Hagood, D. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729–734.Google Scholar
8. Hammerton, J. L. 1974. Weed control work in progress at the University of the West Indies Part 4. PANS 20:429–436.Google Scholar
9. Jansen, L. L. 1964. Surfactant enhancement of herbicide entry. Weeds 12:251–255.Google Scholar
10. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381–405.Google Scholar
11. Koppatschek, F., Liebl, R., and Wax, L. 1986. Fertilizer additives for acifluorfen and bentazon. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:46.Google Scholar
12. Lueschen, W. E., and Hoverstad, T. R. 1986. Soybean injury and weed control as influenced by additives for postemergence herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:55.Google Scholar
13. Martin, A. R. 1987. Fertilizer additives with postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 42:42.Google Scholar
14. Mitchell, J. W., and Linder, P. J. 1950. Absorption and translocation of radioactive 2,4-DI by bean plants as affected by cosolvents and surface agents. Science 112:54–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mohan, R. G., and Rathmann, D. P. 1986. Addition of spray adjuvants and 2,4-DB to acifluorfen, bentazon and fertilizer combinations in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:45.Google Scholar
16. Munger, P. H., Chandler, J. M., Cothren, J. T., and Hons, F. M. 1987. Soybean (Glycine max) – velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interspecific competition. Weed Sci. 35:647–653.Google Scholar
17. Nalewaja, J. D., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1968. Thiameturon phytotoxicity to kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 36:296–300.Google Scholar
18. O'Sullivan, P. A., O'Donovan, J. T., and Hamman, W. M. 1981. Influence of non-ionic surfactants, ammonium sulphate, water quality and spray volume on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Owen, M.D.K. 1986. Effects of application timing and herbicide additives on efficacy of herbicides applied postemergence for soybean weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:40.Google Scholar
20. Petersen, P. J., Haderlie, L. C., Hoefer, R. H., and McAllister, R. S. 1985. Dicamba absorption and translocation as influenced by formulation and surfactant. Weed Sci. 33:717–720.Google Scholar
21. Ruizzo, M. A., and Gorski, S. F. 1987. Effect of adjuvants on cucumber (Cucumis sativus) sensitivity to quizalofop. Weed Sci. 35:559–563.Google Scholar
22. Sherrick, S. L., Holt, H. A., and Hess, F.D. 1986. Effects of adjuvants and environment during plant development on glyphosate absorption and translocation in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 34:811–816.Google Scholar
23. Staniforth, D. W., and Loomis, W. E. 1949. Surface action in 2,4-D sprays. Science 109:628–629.Google Scholar
24. Suwunnamek, U., and Parker, C. 1975. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulphate and other additives. Weed Res. 15:13–19.Google Scholar
25. Szabo, S. S., and Buchholtz, K. P. 1961. Penetration of living and nonliving surfaces by 2,4-D as influenced by ionic additives. Weeds 9:177–184.Google Scholar
26. Temple, R. E., and Hilton, H. W. 1963. The effect of surfactants on the water solubility of herbicides, and the foliar phytotoxicity of surfactants. Weeds 11:297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Turner, D. J., and Loader, M.P.C. 1984. Effect of ammonium sulphate and related salts on the phytotoxicity of dichlorprop and other herbicides used for broadleaved weed control in cereals. Weed Res. 24:67–77.Google Scholar
28. Turner, D. J., and Loader, M.P.C. 1975. Further studies with additives: effects of phosphate esters and ammonium salts on the activity of leaf-applied herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 6:1–10.Google Scholar
29. Willingham, G. L., and Graham, L. L. 1988. Influence of environmental factors and adjuvants on the foliar penetration of acifluorfen in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti): An analysis using the fractional factorial design. Weed Sci. 36:824–829.Google Scholar
30. Wilson, B. J., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram activity and absorption. Weed Sci. 23:289–296.Google Scholar
31. Wilson, B. J., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram absorption by detached leaves. Weed Sci. 23:297–301.Google Scholar