Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:22:41.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Growth Stages on Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Rimsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Sowmya Mitra*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Stockbridge Hall. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Stockbridge Hall. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: smitra@pssci.umass.edu.

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to determine the effects of postemergence (POST) application of rimsulfuron on quackgrass control. Rimsulfuron applied at 27 g ai/ ha to two-to four-leaf quackgrass controlled 100% of quackgrass 5 wk after treatment (WAT). Rimsulfuron applied to one- to two-leaf quackgrass was not as effective as the same rate applied to two- to four-or four- to six-leaf quackgrass. Stunting and leaf wrinkling of corn were observed 4 WAT when rimsulfuron was applied at 36 g/ha to four- to six-leaf quackgrass. The plants recovered from the stunting as the season progressed and by 12 WAT there was no appreciable stunting. Rimsulfuron (27 g/ha) applied to two- to four-leaf quackgrass increased grain and silage yield of corn by 36% and 45%, respectively, compared to the untreated check. The 27 g/ha rate of rimsulfuron applied to two- to four-leaf quackgrass resulted in 10% more grain yield than the same treatment applied to one- to two- leaf quackgrass. Rimsulfuron at 18 g/ha led to a 17% reduction of sitage yield when applied to the four- to six-leaf quackgrass. At all growth stages of quackgrass, rimsulfuron gave higher grain and silage yields than corn treated with the same rate and timing of nicosulfuron. Rimsulfuron reduced sprouting of quackgrass rhizome nodes, especially at higher rates.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Article 3241.

References

Literature Cited

Bandeen, J. D. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1967. Competitive effects of quackgrass upon corn as modified by fertilization. Weed Sci. 14:220224.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., ed. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Dekker. pp. 117189.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1995. Integrated techniques for controlling Elytrigia repens populations. Ninth Eur. Weed Res. Soc., Budapest, 1995. p. 611618.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C., O'Toole, B. M., and Andaloro, J. 1992. Effects of nicosulfuron on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:5256.Google Scholar
Damon, R. A. Jr., and Harvey, W. R. 1987. Experimental Design, Anova and Regression. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
Darwent, A. L., Baig, M. N., Lefkovitch, L. P., and Gallagher, A. W. 1989. Control of quackgrass in fallow from several glyphosate plus tillage treatments and its effect on the subsequent yield of barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:12071215.Google Scholar
Gillespie, G. R. and Vitolo, D. 1993. Response of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) biotypes to primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:411416.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1978. Effects of quackgrass competition on silage corn yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:539542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1981. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:226234.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Bhowmik, P. C. 1997. Effects of rimsulfuron on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in field corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:58.Google Scholar
Ngouajio, M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1993. Weed control in corn (Zea mays) with primisulfuron as influenced by rate, timing, and herbicide combinations. Weed Technol. 7:6569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohman, J. H. and Kommendahl, T. 1960. Relative toxicity of extracts from vegetative organs of quackgrass to alfaalfa. Weed. Sci. 12:126128.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toai, T. V. and Linscott, D. L. 1979. Phytotoxic effects of decaying quackgrass (Agropyron repens) residues. Weed Sci. 27:595598.Google Scholar
Werner, P. A. and Rioux, R. 1977. The biology of Canadian weeds. 24. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:905919.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1983a. Effects of irrigation on quackgrass (Agropyron repens) residues. Weed Sci. 27:595598.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1983b. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:226234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar