Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:13:10.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean response to weed interference and defoliation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles F. Grymes ,
James L. Griffin ,
David J. Boethel ,
B. Rogers Leonard ,
David L. Jordan  and
John S. Russin
Charles F. Grymes
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David J. Boethel
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
B. Rogers Leonard
Affiliation:
Macon Ridge Research Station, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Winnshoro, IA 71295–5719
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7620
John S. Russin
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Louisiana over 2 yr to evaluate the influence of full-season interference from johnsongrass, common cocklebur, or hemp sesbania at densities of 2.5, 0.5, and 2.0 plants m–1 of row, respectively, and simulated insect defoliation of soybean on weed and soybean growth. Defoliation at R2 (full bloom) and R5 (beginning seed development) soybean growth stages was accomplished by removal of zero, one, or two leaflets per soybean trifoliate, which approximated 0, 33, and 66% defoliation, respectively. Height and dry weight of all weeds were not affected by soybean defoliation level or defoliation stage. Soybean height 3 wk after defoliation at R5 was not influenced by weed interference, soybean defoliation level, or defoliation stage in either year. Averaged across soybean defoliation levels and stages in 1994, johnsongrass, common cocklebur, and hemp sesbania reduced soybean yields 30, 15, and 14%, respectively. In 1995, johnsongrass reduced soybean yield 35%. As soybean defoliation level increased, a linear decrease in soybean yield was observed. Averaged across weeds and soybean defoliation stages, 33 and 66% defoliation reduced soybean yield 6 and 20% in 1994 and 12 and 33% in 1995, respectively. Defoliation at R5 resulted in 10% lower yield than defoliation at R2 in one of two years. Yield reduction due to combinations of weeds and soybean defoliation was additive.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. XANSThemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rybd. ex A. W. Hill SEBEXjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. SORHAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 6785.’Pest managementpest complexesmultiple pestscompetitionsimulated insect defoliationleaf areaXANSTSEBEXSORHA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 90 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Zeneca Ag Products, Victoria, TX 77901

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, J. L., Boethel, D. J., and Leonard, B. R. 1994. Control Soybean Insects 1994. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Publ. 2211. 15 p.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybean. Weed Sci. 22: 600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, I. A., Owen, M.D.K., and Hatterman-Valenti, H. M. 1995. Effect of shade on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) growth, seed production, and dormancy. Weed Technol. 9: 452–455.Google Scholar
Board, J. E. and Harville, B. G. 1993. Soybean yield component responses to a light interception gradient during reproductive period. Crop Sci. 33: 772–777.Google Scholar
Board, J. E., Wier, A. T., and Boethel, D. J. 1994. Soybean yield reductions caused by defoliation during mid to late seed filling. Agron. J. 86: 1074–1079.Google Scholar
Boldt, P. E., Biever, K. D., and Ignoffo, C. M. 1975. Lepidopteran pest of soybeans: consumption of soybean foliage and pods and development time. J. Econ. Entomol. 68: 480–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, F. L. and Johnson, S. J. 1985. Reproductive response of caged adult velvetbean caterpillar and soybean looper to the presence of weeds. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 14: 139–149.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11: 929–931.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., and Vorst, J. J. 1977. Response of indeterminate and determinate soybean cultivars to defoliation and half-plant cut-off. Crop Sci. 17: 913–917.Google Scholar
Goli, A. and Weaver, D. B. 1986. Defoliation responses of determinate and indeterminate late-planted soybeans. Crop Sci. 26: 156–159.Google Scholar
Helm, C. G., Kogan, M., Onstad, D. W., Max, L. M., and Jeffords, M. R. 1992. Effects of velvetleaf competition and defoliation by soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on yield of indeterminate soybean. J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 2433–2439.Google Scholar
Higgins, R. A., Pedigo, L. P., and Staniforth, D. W. 1984a. Effect of velvetleaf competition and defoliation simulating a green cloverworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) outbreak in Iowa on indeterminate soybean yield, yield components, and economic decision levels. Environ. Entomol. 13: 917–925.Google Scholar
Higgins, R. A., Staniforth, D. W., and Pedigo, L. P. 1984b. Effects of weed density and defoliated or undefoliated soybeans (Glycine max) on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) development. Weed Sci. 32: 511–519.Google Scholar
Higley, L. G. 1992. New understandings of soybean defoliation and their implication for pest management. Pages 56–65 in Copping, L. G., Green, M. B., and Rees, R. T., eds. Pest Management in Soybean. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinson, K., Nino, R. H., and Booto, K. J. 1978. Characteristics of removed leaflets and yield response of artificially defoliated soybeans. Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. 37: 104–109.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27: 58–64.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20: 56–59.Google Scholar
Mosier, D. G. and Oliver, L. R. 1995. Soybean (Glycine max) interference on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 43: 402–409.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. D. and Boethel, D. J. 1985. Interpreting multiple pest interactions in soybean. Pages 232–255 in Frisbie, R. E. and Adkisson, P. L., eds. Integrated Pest Management in Major Agricultural Systems. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, MP-1616.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R. 1988. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technol. 2: 398–403.Google Scholar
Ostlie, K. R. and Pedigo, L. P. 1984. Water loss from soybeans after simulated and actual insect defoliation. Environ. Entomol. 13: 1675–1680.Google Scholar
Reid, J. C. and Greene, G. L. 1973. The soybean looper: pupal weight, development time, and consumption of soybean foliage. Fla. Entomol. 56: 203–206.Google Scholar
Robbins, R. T., Oliver, L. R., and Mueller, A. J. 1990. Interaction among a nematode (Heterodera glycines), an insect, and three weeds in soybean. J. Nematol. Suppl. 22: 729–734.Google Scholar
Russin, J. S., Layton, M. B., and Boethel, D. J. 1989. Severity of soybean stem canker disease affected by insect-induced defoliation. Plant Dis. 73: 144–147.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Steffey, K. L., Gray, M. E., and Higley, L. G. 1994. Introduction to identification and diagnosis of injury. Pages 17–19 in Higley, L. G. and Boethel, D. J., eds. Handbook of Soybean Insect Pests. Lanham, MD: Entomology Society of America.Google Scholar
Todd, J. W. and Morgan, L. W. 1972. Effects of hand defoliation on yield and seed weight of soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 567–570.Google Scholar
Turnipseed, S. G. 1972. Response of soybeans to foliage losses in South Carolina. J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 224–229.Google Scholar
Turnipseed, S. G. and Kogan, M. 1987. Integrated control of insect pests. Pages 779–817 in Wilcox, J. R., ed. Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Williams, C. S. and Hayes, R. M. 1984. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32: 498–501.Google Scholar