Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T19:12:52.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination I: effect of seed burial and germination temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert S. Gallagher  and
John Cardina
Robert S. Gallagher*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Crop, and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
John Cardina
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
*
Corresponding author. rsg9@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research was conducted to evaluate the light requirement for redroot and smooth pigweed germination in soil, and how this requirement is affected by germination temperature and seasonal periodicity in seed dormancy. Seed enclosed in nylon mesh bags was buried in the field in December 1993 and 1994 and was recovered throughout the spring and summer of the following year, respectively. Germination was highest with red light or at 30 C. The requirement for red light was more pronounced at 20 vs. 30 C. The saturating fluence of red light was as low as 3 μmol m−2 in buried seed and 1,000 μmol m−2 in unburied control seed, depending on germination temperature. The effect of light and germination temperature pigweed germination also changed throughout the growing season. Our results indicate that light may be a requirement for germination in only the most dormant weed seed in the soil seedbank.

Keywords

Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L., AMAREsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L., AMACHSeedbank dynamics seed germinationphytochromephotomorphogenesisAMAREAMACH
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 48 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. N. 1968. Pages 13–15 in Germination and Establishment of Weeds for Experimental Purposes. Geneva, New York: W. F. Humphrey Press.Google Scholar
Ballaré, C. L., Scopel, A. L., Ghersa, C. M., and Sánchez, R. A. 1988. The fate of Datura ferox seeds in the soil as affected by cultivation, depth of burial and degree of maturity. Ann. Appl. Bot. 112: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1980. Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of Ambrosia artemisiifolia . Ecology 61: 475–480.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1989. Physiology of dormancy and germination in relation to seed bank ecology. Pages 53–65 in Leck, M., Parker, V., and Simpson, R., eds. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, H. J. and Karssen, C. M. 1993. Seasonal periodicity in germination of seeds of Chenopodium album L. Ann. Bot. 72: 462–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, J. W. and Kendrick, R. E. 1986. Photocontrol of seed germination. Pages 443–462 in Kendrick, R. and Kronberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff/W.D. Junk Publishers.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. 1996. Ecophysiological Aspects of Phytochrome-mediated Germination in Soil Seed Banks. . The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio. 121 p.Google Scholar
Gramshaw, D. and Stern, W. R. 1977. Survival of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) seed in a mediterranean type environment II: effects of short-term burial on persistence of viable seed. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 28: 93–101.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. M. and Nezedal, W. 1990. Photocontrol of weeds without herbicides. Naturwissenschaften 77: 158–163.Google Scholar
Jacques, G. L., Vesecky, J. F., Feltner, K. C., and Vanderlip, R. L. 1974. Effects of depth and duration of burial on shattercane seed. Crop Sci. 14: 787–789.Google Scholar
Kigel, J. 1994. Development and ecophysiology of amaranths. Pages 39–73 in Parede-Lopez, O., ed. Amaranth Biology, Chemistry, and Technology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Mancinelli, A. L. 1994. The physiology of phytochrome action. Pages 211–269 in Kendrick, R. and Kronberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants—2nd. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. and Struik, G. 1964. A possible ecological relation between soil disturbance, light flash, and seed germination. Ecology 45: 884–886.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballaré, C. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1994. Photostimulation of seed germination during soil tillage. New Phytol. 126: 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballaté, C. L., and Sánchez, R. A. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weed seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivations. Plant Cell Environ. 14: 501–508.Google Scholar
Smith, H. 1995. Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 289–315.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1972. Phytochrome controlled changes in dormancy and germination of buried weed seeds. Weed Sci. 20: 417–422.Google Scholar
Wesson, G. and Wareing, P. F. 1969. The role of light in the germination of naturally occurring populations of buried weed seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 20: 402–413.Google Scholar
Zorner, P. S., Zimdahl, R. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1984. Effect of depth and duration of seed burial on Kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 32: 602–607.Google Scholar