Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:49:32.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Effects on Weed Competitiveness is Species Dependent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw  and
Randall N. Brandt
Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403–1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
Randall N. Brandt
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403–1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: blackshawre@agr.gc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information on nitrogen fertilizer effects on crop–weed competitive interactions might aid in developing improved weed management programs. A controlled environment study was conducted to examine the effect of three N rates on the competitive ability of four weed species grown with wheat. The four weed species were chosen to represent species that varied in their growth responsiveness to nitrogen (N): Persian darnel (low), Russian thistle (low), redroot pigweed (high), and wild oat (high). Wheat and each weed species were grown in a replacement series design at N rates of 60, 120, and 240 mg N kg−1 soil. The competitive ability of the low N-responsive species, Persian darnel and Russian thistle, was not influenced by N rate, supporting our hypothesis that N rate would have little effect on the competitiveness of species responding minimally to N. Conversely, the competitiveness of the high N-responsive species redroot pigweed progressively improved as N rate increased. However, wild oat competitiveness was unaffected by N fertilizer rate. There is some evidence from this study to suggest that fertilizer management strategies that favor crops over weeds deserve greater attention when weed infestations consist of species known to be highly responsive to higher soil N levels. Information gained in this study will be used to advise farmers of the importance of strategic fertilizer management in terms of both weed management and crop yield.

Keywords

Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREwild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFAPersian darnel, Lolium persicum Boiss. & Hohen. ex Boiss. LOLPSwild mustard, Sinapis arvensis L. SINARwheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘AC Barrie’.Competitioninterferencenitrogen fertilizernitrogen uptakeweed managementweed nitrogen concentration
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 5 , October 2008 , pp. 743 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abouziema, H. F., El-Karmany, M. F., Singh, M., and Sharma, S. D. 2007. Effect of nitrogen rates and weed control treatments on maize yield and associated weeds in sandy soils. Weed Technol. 21:1049–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampong-Nyarko, K. and de Datta, S. K. 1993. Effects of nitrogen application on growth, nitrogen use efficiency and rice-weed interaction. Weed Res. 33:269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, C., Litz, A. S., and Streibig, J. C. 2006. Growth response of six weed species and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) to increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Weed Res. 46:503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Anderson, R. L., and Lemerle, D. 2007. Cultural weed management. Pages 35–47. in Upadhyaya, M. K. and Blackshaw, R. E. Non-chemical Weed Management: Principles, Concepts and Technology. Oxfordfordshire, UK CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Brandt, R. N., Janzen, H. H., Grant, C. A., and Derksen, D. A. 2003. Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Sci. 51:532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Molnar, L. J., and Janzen, H. H. 2004. Nitrogen fertilizer timing and application method affect weed growth and competition with spring wheat. Weed Sci. 52:614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camara, K. M., Payne, W. A., and Rasmussen, P. E. 2003. Long-term effects of tillage, nitrogen, and rainfall on winter wheat yields in the Pacific Northwest. Agron. J. 95:828–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, R. J. and Swanton, C. J. 2004. Nitrogen management will influence threshold values of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) in corn. Weed Sci. 51:975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 5:664–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhima, K. V. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 2001. Influence of nitrogen on competition between winter cereals and sterile oat. Weed Sci. 49:77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Lindquist, J. L., Shapiro, C. A., and Blankenship, E. E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51:408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez Ponce, R. 1998. Competition between barley and Lolium rigidum for nitrate. Weed Res. 38:453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, S. R. and Johnson, W. G. 2002. Influence of shattercane [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] interference on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and nitrogen accumulation. Weed Technol. 16:787–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, J. F. and Jordan, L. S. 1982. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum and T. turgidum durum) for nitrate. Weed Sci. 30:297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørnsgard, B., Rasmussen, K., Hill, J., and Christensen, J. L. 1996. Influence of nitrogen on competition between cereals and their natural weed populations. Weed Res. 36:461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. and Beckie, H. J. 1998. Contribution of nitrogen fertilizer placement to weed management in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 12:507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M. and Janke, R. J. 1990. Sustainable weed management practices. Pages 111–143. in Francis, C. A., Flora, C. B., and King, L. D. Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones. New York John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, C. A. and Trenbath, B. R. 1971. A revised analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics. 27:659–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesbah, A. O. and Miller, S. D. 1999. Fertilizer placement affects jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) competition in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 13:374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, J. S. and Kurchania, S. P. 2001. Nutrient concentration in mustard and associated weeds as influenced by nitrogen levels, planting geometry and weed control methods. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 6:386–389.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 2001. Enhancing the competitive ability of crops. Pages 269–374. in Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., and Staver, C. P. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qasem, J. R. 1992. Root growth, development and nutrient uptake of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and Chenopodium album . Weed Res. 33:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, W. R. and Johnson, G. V. 1999. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron. J. 9:357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, B. M., Morales-Payan, J. P., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1998. Influence of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) density and nitrogen rate on radish (Raphanus sativus) yield. Weed Sci. 46:661–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satorre, E. H. and Snaydon, R. W. 1992. A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua L. Weed Res. 32:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc 2005. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. SAS Institute. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Supasilapa, S., Steer, B. T., and Milroy, S. P. 1992. Competition between lupin (Lupinus angustifolia L.) and great brome (Bromus diandrus Roth.): development of leaf area, light interception and yields. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 32:71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teyker, R. H., Hoelzer, H. D., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Maize and pigweed response to nitrogen supply and form. Plant Soil. 135:287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Delden, A., Lotz, L. A. P., Bastiaans, L., Franke, A. C., Smid, H. G., Groeneveld, R. M. W., and Kropff, M. J. 2002. The influence of nitrogen supply on the ability of wheat and potato to suppress Stellaria media growth and reproduction. Weed Res. 42:429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigelt, A. and Jolliffe, P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. J. Ecol. 91:707–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoschke, A. and Quadranti, M. 2002. Integrated weed management: Quo vadis. Weed Biol. Manag. 2:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar