Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:00:13.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to the Invasive Plant Species and the New Bioeconomy Symposium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adam S. Davis
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Weed Management Unit, Urbana, IL 61801. adam.davis@ars.usda.gov
Daniel C. Brainard
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Eric R. Gallandt
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469

Extract

The rapid expansion of the plant bioeconomy is creating strong economic incentives to distribute novel plant material, including transgenic cultivars, exotic species, and species that were formerly constrained to small geographical areas, at large geographical scales. Such introductions carry with them the risk of invasive spread of the introduced species (Simberloff and Alexander 1998). Deployment of plant species for biofuel production offers a clear example of the benefits and risks associated with the new bioeconomy (Raghu et al. 2006).

In a measure aimed at reducing U.S. dependence upon foreign petroleum reserves for energy production, President Bush announced the Advanced Energy Initiative (AEI) in his 2006 State of the Union address. This initiative provides federal funding and guidelines for the development of renewable energy sources, including plant biofuels. The objectives of the AEI, though admirable, have the potential to create a conflict with Executive Order 13112, which states that “[Federal agencies shall] not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of invasive species in the United States or elsewhere unless, pursuant to guidelines that it has prescribed, the agency has determined and made public its determination that the benefits of such actions clearly outweigh the potential harm caused by invasive species; and that all feasible and prudent measures to minimize risk of harm will be taken in conjunction with the actions.”

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Caley, P. and Kuhnert, P. M. 2006. Application and evaluation of classification trees for screening unwanted plants. Aust. Ecol. 31:647655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Barney, J. N., and Fox, A. M. 2007. Biofuel Feedstocks: The Risk of Future Invasions. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Commentary QTA 2007-1. 8.Google Scholar
Raghu, S., Anderson, R. C., Daehler, C. C., Davis, A. S., Wiedenmann, R. N., Simberloff, D., and Mack, R. N. 2006. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire. Science. 313:1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Alexander, M. 1998. Assessing risks to ecological systems from biological introductions. Pages 147176. in Calow, P. Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Oxford, UK Blackwell Science.Google Scholar