Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:19:35.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Intraspecific Henbit (Lamium amplexicaule) and Purple Deadnettle (Lamium purpureum) Competition on Soybean Cyst Nematode Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Earl Creech ,
Jamal Faghihi ,
Virginia R. Ferris ,
Andreas Westphal  and
William G. Johnson
J. Earl Creech
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Jamal Faghihi
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Virginia R. Ferris
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Andreas Westphal
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A greenhouse study was conducted to determine the effect of henbit and purple deadnettle density on weed biomass accumulation and soybean cyst nematode (SCN) reproduction. SCN did not impact shoot or root dry weight of purple deadnettle, henbit, or soybean. Foliar and root biomass of henbit and purple deadnettle were comparable but the biomass per stem was higher for purple deadnettle. Shoot and root biomass per pot of henbit and purple deadnettle at corresponding plant densities were statistically similar and were generally higher with increasing plant density. Henbit produced a greater number of stems than purple deadnettle and the least number of stems for both species existed at low densities. Purple deadnettle allowed for more SCN reproduction than did henbit. Weed densities also influenced SCN cyst and egg production but the results were species dependent. The highest SCN reproduction per pot was supported at low to moderate densities of purple deadnettle but at moderate to high densities of henbit. These results suggest that purple deadnettle should be more aggressively managed than henbit in management programs for SCN, but that henbit, especially at high densities, can support SCN reproduction at levels near those of purple deadnettle.

Keywords

Henbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. LAMAMpurple deadnettle Lamium purpureum L. LAMPUsoybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams 82’ and ‘PI437654’Integrated pest managementweed densitywinter annual weeds
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 665 - 670
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alston, D. G., Bradley, J. R. Jr., Coble, H. D., and Schmitt, D. P. 1991. Impact of population density of Heterodera glycines on soybean canopy growth and weed competition. Plant Dis. 75:1016–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, D. G. and Schmitt, D. P. 1988. Development of Heterodera glycines life stages as influenced by temperature. J. Nematol. 20:366–372.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. D., Higley, L. G., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 1996. Competition between triazine-resistant and -susceptible common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 44:853–859.Google Scholar
Barker, K. R., Koenning, S. R., and Schmitt, D. P. 2004. Population density based management. Pages 89–110. in Schmitt, D.P., Wrather, J.A., Riggs, R.D. eds. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. W., Johnson, W. G., Nelson, K. A., and Dewell, R. A. 2003. Impact of spring-applied, residual herbicides on winter annual weed populations after crop harvest. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:131.Google Scholar
Bozsa, R. C., Oliver, L. R., and Driver, T. L. 1989. Intraspecific and interspecific sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference. Weed Sci. 37:670–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browde, J. A., Pedigo, L. P., Owen, M. D. K., Tylka, G. L., and Levene, B. C. 1994. Growth of soybean stressed by nematodes, herbicides, and simulated insect defoliation. Agron. J. 86:968–974.Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y. 2004. Management with biological methods. Pages 207–242. in Schmitt, D.P., Wrather, J.A., Riggs, R.D. eds. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Bird, G. W., and Renner, K. A. 1995. Influence of Heterodera glycines on interspecific and intraspecific competition associated with Glycine max and Chenopodium album . J. Nematol. 27:63–69.Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y., Stienstra, W. C., Lueschen, W. E., and Hoverstad, T. R. 2001. Response of Heterodera glycines and soybean cultivar to tillage and row spacing. Plant Dis. 85:311–316.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 86–133.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E. and Johnson, W. G. 2006. Survey of broadleaf winter weeds in Indiana production fields infested with soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Weed Technol. 20:1066–1075.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Johnson, W. G., Faghihi, J., Ferris, V. R., and Westphal, A. 2005. First report of soybean cyst nematode reproduction on purple deadnettle under field conditions. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/. Accessed: February 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Daugovish, O., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 2002. Competition between wild oat (Avena fatua) and yellow mustard (Sinapis alba) or canola (Brassica napus). Weed Sci. 50:587–594.Google Scholar
Donald, P. A., Noel, G. R., Melakeberhan, H., Atibalentja, N., Anderson, T. R., Chen, S. Y., Faghihi, J., Ferris, J. M., Grau, C. R., Hershman, D. E., MacGuidwin, A. E., Niblack, T. L., Riggs, R. D., Stienstra, W. C., Tylka, G. L., and Welacky, T. 1999. Ten-state evaluation of selected agronomic practices on soybean cyst nematode. J. Nematol. 31:531.Google Scholar
Faghihi, J. and Ferris, J. M. 2000. An efficient new device to release eggs from Heterodera glycines . J. Nematol. 32:411–413.Google Scholar
Faghihi, J., Ferris, J. M., and Ferris, V. R. 1986. Heterodera glycines in Indiana: I. reproduction of geographical isolates on soybean differentials. J. Nematol. 18:169–172.Google Scholar
Faghihi, J. and Ferris, V. R. 2006. Soybean cyst nematode. Department of Entomology. Purdue University http://www.entm.purdue.edu/Entomology/ext/targets/e-series/EseriesPDF/E-210.pdf. Accessed: September, 20 2006.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hillger, D. E. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:1065–1070.Google Scholar
Hashem, A., Radosevich, S. R., and Roush, M. L. 1998. Effect of proximity factors on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46:181–190.Google Scholar
Heatherly, L. G. and Young, L. D. 1991. Soybean and soybean cyst nematode response to soil water content in loam and clay soil. Crop Sci. 31:191–196.Google Scholar
Heatherly, L. G., Young, L. D., Epps, J. M., and Hartwig, E. E. 1982. Effect of upper-profile soil water potential on numbers of cysts of Heterodera glycines on soybeans. Crop Sci. 22:833–835.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. B., Scott, H. D., and Riggs, R. D. 1993. Penetration of soybean roots by soybean cyst nematode at high soil water potentials. Agron. J. 85:416–419.Google Scholar
Kadir, J. B., Charudattan, R., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1999. Effect of Dactylaria higginsii on interference of Cyperus rotundus with L. esculentum . Weed Sci. 47:682–686.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. C., Scriber, J. M., and Harvey, R. G. 1986. Relationship of weed density with leafhopper populations in alfalfa, Wisconsin. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 17:281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z. and Horak, M. J. 1998. Influence of emergence time and density on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 46:665–672.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2003. Winter annual weed control with fall-applied corn (Zea mays) herbicides. Weed Technol. 17:516–520.Google Scholar
McSorley, R. and Campbell, C. W. 1980. Relationship between nematode density and weed density in avocado groves. Nematropica. 10:96–102.Google Scholar
Niblack, T. L. 2005. Soybean cyst nematode management reconsidered. Plant Dis. 89:1020–1026.Google Scholar
Nice, G. and Johnson, B. 2005. Indiana's top ten most problematic weeds. Purdue University Weed Science Extension Bulletin. http://www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience/2005/topten05.pdf. Accessed: September 20, 2006.Google Scholar
Noel, G. R. 2004. Soybean response to infection. Pages 131–151. in Schmitt, D.P., Wrather, J.A., Riggs, R.D. eds. Biology and Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode. 2nd ed. Marceline, MO Schmitt and Associates.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F., Elmore, C. L., Rejmanek, M., and Akey, W. C. 2001a. Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: I. crop growth and yield. Weed Sci. 49:61–68.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F., Elmore, C. L., Rejmanek, M., and Akey, W. C. 2001b. Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: II. barnyardgrass growth and seed production. Weed Sci. 49:69–76.Google Scholar
Qasem, J. R. and Hill, T. A. 1994. Inter-specific competition of fat-hen (Chenopodium album L.) and groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.). Weed Res. 34:109–118.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Bewick, T. A., Stall, W. M., and Shilling, D. G. 1997. Competitive interactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nutsedges (Cyperus spp.). Weed Sci. 45:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. W. 1999. Yellow (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) are not injured by increasing root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) population density. Weed Sci. 47:201–207.Google Scholar
Smith, G. J., Wiebold, W. J., Niblack, T. L., Scharf, P. C., and Blevins, D. B. 2001. Macronutrient concentrations of soybean infected with soybean cyst nematode. Plant Soil. 235:21–26.Google Scholar
Steinbauer, G. P., Grigsby, B., Correa, L., and Frank, P. 1955. A study of methods for obtaining laboratory germination of certain weed seeds. Assoc. Official Seed Analysts Proc. 45:48–52.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. H., Schroeder, J., Kenney, M. J., and Murray, L. W. 1999. Meloidogyne incognita inoculum source affects host suitability and growth of yellow nutsedge and chile pepper. J. Nematol. 29:404–410.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) interference in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci. 38:338–343.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S. K., Regnier, E. E., and Riedel, R. M. 2003. Soybean cyst nematode reproduction on purple deadnettle under greenhouse conditions. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 58:68.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S. K., Regnier, E. E., and Riedel, R. M. 2004. Purple deadnettle effects on soybean cyst nematode populations in no-till soybean. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 59:56.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, R., Harrison, S. K., and Riedel, R. M. 2000. Weed hosts of soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) in Ohio. Weed Technol. 14:156–160.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Niblack, T. L., Tremain, J. A., Wiebold, W. J., Tylka, G. L., Marett, C. C., Noel, G. R., Myers, O., and Schmidt, M. E. 2003. Soybean cyst nematode reduces soybean yield without causing obvious aboveground symptoms. Plant Dis. 87:623–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicks, G. A., Burnside, O. C., and Felton, W. L. 1994. Weed control in conservation tillage systems. Pages 211–244. in Unger, P.W. ed. Managing agricultural residues. Boca Raton, FL Lewis.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Wright, K. J., Brain, P., Clements, M., and Stephens, E. 1995. Predicting the competitive effects of weed and crop density on weed biomass, weed seed production and crop yield in wheat. Weed Res. 35:265–278.Google Scholar
Wrather, J. A. and Koenning, S. R. 2006. Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003 to 2005. J. Nematol. 38:173–180.Google Scholar
Wrather, J. A., Koenning, S. R., and Anderson, T. R. 2003. Effect of diseases on soybean yields in the United States and Ontario (1999–2002). http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/php/default.asp. Accessed: February 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Harrison, S. K., and Riedel, R. M. 2002. Soybean (Glycine max) response to glyphosate and soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Weed Technol. 16:332–339.Google Scholar