Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:24:06.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth Plasticity of Junglerice (Echinochloa colona) for Resource Use When Grown with Different Rice (Oryza sativa) Planting Densities and Nitrogen Rates in Dry-Seeded Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tahir Hussain Awan*
Affiliation:
Weed Science, Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines Crop Science Cluster, College of Agriculture, University of Philippines Los Baños
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Affiliation:
Weed Science, Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines
Pompe C. Sta. Cruz
Affiliation:
Crop Science Cluster, College of Agriculture, University of Philippines Los Baños
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: t.awan@irri.org; tahirawanrri@gmail.com

Abstract

Junglerice is one of the world's most problematic C4 grass weeds present in dry-seeded rice in many countries. A screenhouse study was conducted to determine the effect of four rice planting densities (0, 100, 200, and 400 plants m−2) and four nitrogen (N) rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha−1) on the growth and morphological plasticity of junglerice. Junglerice plant height was reduced by 15 to 35%, tiller number by 54 to 77%, leaf number by 61 to 85%, leaf area by 69 to 90%, leaf biomass by 63 to 88%, stem biomass by 70 to 92%, and inflorescence biomass by 66 to 94% at rice planting densities ranging from 100 to 400 plants m−2 relative to the junglerice plants grown alone. However, all these growth parameters increased with increasing N rates. Junglerice biomass increased by 125 to 472%, whereas rice biomass increased by 122 to 285% with the application of 50 to 150 kg N ha−1. Additional N favored junglerice biomass production relative to rice. Rice crop interference (200 to 400 plants m−2) reduced junglerice growth and biomass and overshaded the junglerice plants when no N was applied. Increasing N application resulted in taller plants and higher biomass of junglerice, while it reduced root-shoot weight ratio. These results suggest that increasing N rate increased the competitive ability of the junglerice over rice regardless of crop planting density. Information generated in this study could be useful in devising appropriate combinations of planting density and fertilizer management strategies for cultural junglerice management, particularly in situations where junglerice species are more responsive than rice to N.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Queensland, Australia.

References

Literature Cited

Ampong-Nyarko, K, De Datta, SK (1993) Effects of nitrogen application on growth, nitrogen use efficiency and rice-weed interaction. Weed Res. 33:269276 Google Scholar
Andersson, TN, Lundegardh, B (1999) Field horsetail (Equisetum arvense)—effects of potassium under different light and nitrogen conditions Weed Sci. 47:4754 Google Scholar
Bhagat, RM, Bhuiyan, SI, Moody, K (1996) Water, tillage and weed interactions in lowland tropical rice: a review. Agric Water Manage. 31:165184 Google Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Brandt, RN (2008) Nitrogen fertilizer rate effects on weed competitiveness is species dependent. Weed Sci. 56:743747 Google Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Brandt, RN, Janzen, HH, Grant, CA, Derksen, DA (2003) Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Sci. 51:532539 Google Scholar
Bonifas, KD, Walters, DT, Cassman, KG, Lindquist, JL (2005) Nitrogen supply affects root:shoot ratio in corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Weed Sci. 53:670675 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Liebman, M, Obrycki, JJ (2002) Review: theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Sci. 48:274280 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Abugho, SB (2013a) Effect of water stress on the growth and development of Amaranthus spinosus, Leptochloa chinensis, and rice. Am J Plant Sci. 4:989998 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Abugho, SB (2013b) Effects of water regime, nitrogen fertilization, and rice plant density on growth and reproduction of lowland weed Echinochloa crus-galli . Crop Prot. 54:142147 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2009) Germination ecology of spiny (Amaranthus spinous) and slender amaranth (A. viridis): troublesome weeds of direct seeded rice. Weed Sci. 57:379385 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2010) Response of rice flatsedge (Cyperus iria) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to rice interference. Weed Sci. 58:204208 Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2011) Ecological studies on Echinochloa crus-galli and the implications for weed management in direct-seeded rice. Crop Prot. 30:13851391 Google Scholar
Cornacchia, JW, Cohen, DB, Bowes, GW, Schnagl, RJ, Montoya, BL (1984) Rice Herbicides Molinate and Thiobencarb: A Water Quality Assessment. Sacramento, CA California State Water Resources Control Board Special Project Rep. No. 84-4sp Google Scholar
El-Nady, M, Hamza, A, Derbalah, A (2012) Echinochloa colonum resistance to bispyribac-sodium in Egypt—occurrence and identification. Plant Prot Res. 52:139145 Google Scholar
Evans, SP, Knezevic, SZ, Lindquist, JL, Shapiro, CA, Blankenship, EE (2003) Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51:408417 Google Scholar
Farooq, M, Kadambot, HM, Rehman, H, Aziz, T, Lee, DJ, Wahid, A (2011) Rice direct seeding: experiences, challenges and opportunities Soil Till Res. 111:8798 Google Scholar
Fischer, AJ, Comfort, MA, Bayer, DE, Hill, JE (2000) Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa oryzoides and E. phyllopogon in California Oryza sativa fields. Weed Sci. 48:225230 Google Scholar
Fischer, AJ, Granados, E, Trujillo, D (1993) Propanil resistance in populations of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) in Colombian rice fields. Weed Sci. 41:201206 Google Scholar
Galinato, MI, Moody, K, Piggin, CM (1999) Upland Rice Weeds of South and Southeast Asia. Makati City, Philippines International Rice Research Institute. 156 pGoogle Scholar
Gibson, KD, Fischer, AJ (2001) Relative growth and photosynthetic response of water-seeded rice and Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch to shade. Int J Pest Manage. 47:305309 Google Scholar
Gibson, KD, Fischer, AJ, Foin, TC, Hill, JE (2002) Implications of delayed Echinochloa germination and duration of competition for integrated weed management in water-seeded rice. Weed Res. 42:351358 Google Scholar
Gibson, KD, Fischer, AJ, Foin, TC (2004) Compensatory responses of late watergrass (Echinochloa phyllopogon) and rice to resource limitations. Weed Sci. 52:271280 Google Scholar
Gonzalez, PR (1998) Competition between barley and Lolium rigidum for nitrate. Weed Res. 38:453460 Google Scholar
Hans, SR, Johnson, WG (2002) Influence of shattercane [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] interference on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and nitrogen accumulation. Weed Technol. 16:787791 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2013) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/summary/home.aspx. Accessed October 11, 2013Google Scholar
Hill, JE, Hawkins, LS (1996) Herbicides in United State rice production: lessons for Asia. Pages 3752 in Naylor, R, ed. Suppressing Weeds in Direct-Seeded Lowland Rice. Herbicides in Asian Rice: Transitions in Weed Management. Palo Alto, CA Institute for International Study, Stanford University; Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute Google Scholar
Hill, JE, Smith, RJ, Bayer, DE (1994) Rice weed control: current technology and emerging issues in temperate rice. Aust J Exp Agric. 34:10211029 Google Scholar
Hoagland, RE, Norsworthy, JK, Carey, F, Talbert, RE (2004) Metabolically based resistance to the herbicide propanil in Echinochloa species. Weed Sci. 52:475486 Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1991) The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL The University Press of Hawaii. 609 pGoogle Scholar
Johnson, DE, Mortimer, AM (2008) Issues for weed management in direct-seeded rice and the development of decision-support frameworks. Pages 223228 in Singh, Y, Singh, V. P., Chauhan, B, Orr, A, Mortimer, AM, Johnson, DE, Hardy, B, eds. Direct Seeding of Rice and Weed Management in the Irrigated Rice–Wheat Cropping System of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Los Baños, Philippines International Rice Research Institute and Pantnagar, India: Directorate of Experiment Station, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Google Scholar
Jørnsgard, B, Rasmussen, K, Hill, J, Christiansen, JL (1996) Influence of nitrogen on competition between cereals and their natural weed populations. Weed Res. 36:461470 Google Scholar
Kolvanagh, JS, Salmasi, SZ, Javanshir, A, Moghaddam, M, Nasab, ADM (2008) Effects of nitrogen and duration of weed interference on grain yield and SPAD (chlorophyll) value of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.). J Food Agric Environ. 6:368373 Google Scholar
Kristensen, L, Olsen, J, Weiner, J (2008) Crop density, sowing pattern, and nitrogen fertilization effects on weed suppression and yield in spring wheat. Weed Sci. 56:97102 Google Scholar
Ladha, JK, Pathak, H, Gupta, RK (2007) Sustainability of the rice–wheat cropping system. J Crop Improve. 19:125136 Google Scholar
Liebman, M, Gallandt, ER (1997) Many little hammers: ecological approaches to management of crop–weed interactions. Pages 291346 in Jackson, LE, ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, CA Academic Google Scholar
Lindquist, JL, Evans, SP, Shapiro, CA, Knezevic, SZ (2010) Effect of nitrogen addition and weed interference on soil nitrogen and corn nitrogen nutrition. Weed Technol. 24:5058 Google Scholar
Marenco, RA, Reis, ACS (1998) Shading as an environmental factor affecting the growth of Ischaemum rugosum . Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal. 10:107112 Google Scholar
Mercado, BL, Talatala, RL (1977) Competitive ability of Echinochloa colonum L. against direct-seeded lowland rice. Pages 161165 in Proceedings of the Sixth Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Jakarta, Indonesia Indonesia Asia-Pacific Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Mishra, JS, Kurchania, SP (2001) Nutrient concentration in mustard and associated weeds as influenced by nitrogen rates, planting geometry and weed control methods. Ind J Plant Physiol. 6:386389 Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Dieleman, JA, Johnson, GA (1998) Weed spatial variation and weed management. Pages 293310 in Hatfield, JL, Buhler, DD, Stewart, BA, eds. Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Chelsea, MI Ann Arbor Press Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J, Kaur, R, Kaur, M, Mahey, RK (2009) Production potential of rice (Oryza sativa) as affected by varying population densities of Echinochloa crusgalli . Indian J Weed Sci. 41:3237 Google Scholar
Müller, I, Schmid, B, Weiner, J (2000) The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspec Plant Ecol Evol System. 3:115127 Google Scholar
Naderi, R, Ghadiri, H (2011) Competition of wild mustard (Sinapis arvense L.) densities with rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. J Agr Sci Tech. 13:4551 Google Scholar
Pandey, S, Velasco, L (2005) Trends in crop establishment methods in Asia and research issues. Pages 178181 in Toriyama, K, Heong, KL, Hardy, B, eds. Rice Is Life: Scientific Perspectives for the 21st Century. Los Baños, Philippines International Rice Research Institute; Tsukuba, Japan: Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences Google Scholar
Patterson, DT (1995) Effects of environmental-stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Sci. 43:483490 Google Scholar
Phuong, LT, Denich, M, Vlek, PLG, Balasubramanian, V (2005) Suppressing weeds in direct-seeded lowland rice: effects of methods and rates of seeding. J Agron Crop Sci. 191:185194 Google Scholar
Pittelkow, CM, Fischer, AJ, Moechnig, MJ, Hill, JE, Koffler, KB, Mutters, RG, Greer, CA, Cho, YS, Van Kessel, C, Linquist, BA (2012) Agronomic productivity and nitrogen requirements of alternative tillage and crop establishment systems for improved weed control in direct-seeded rice. Field Crops Res. 130:128137 Google Scholar
Prasad Babu, MBB (2012) Impact of varying densities of jungle rice on rice productivity. Indian J Weed Sci. 44:4345 Google Scholar
Rao, AN, Johnson, DE, Sivaprasad, B (2007) Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv Agron. 93:153255 Google Scholar
Reynolds, HL, Antonio, CD (1996) The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion. Plant Soil. 185:7597 Google Scholar
Stoskopf, NC (1985) Cereal Grain Crops. Reston, VA Reston Publishing. 516 pGoogle Scholar
Valverde, BE (1996) Management of herbicide resistant weeds in Latin America: the case of propanil-resistant Echinochloa colona in rice. Pages 415420 in Proceedings of the International Weed Control Congress, 2nd, Copenhagen. 25–28 June 1996. Flakkebjerg, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, stracts 33 (Denver, CO). Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Valverde, BE (2007) Status and management of grass-weed herbicide resistance in Latin America. Weed Technol. 21:310323 Google Scholar
Vourlitis, GL, Kroon, JL (2013) Growth and resource use of the invasive grass, pampagrass (Cortaderia selloana), in response to nitrogen and water availability. Weed Sci. 61:117125 Google Scholar
Weiner, J, Griepentrog, HW, Kristensen, L (2001) Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum aestivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. J Appl Ecol. 38:784790 Google Scholar