Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:13:10.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil-Water Relations and Interference Between Devil's-Claw (Proboscidea louisianica) and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael S. Riffle
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
John F. Stone
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
David L. Weeks
Affiliation:
Dep. Stat., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078

Abstract

Soil water from plots containing cotton, devil's-claw, cotton with devil's-claw, and bare soil was measured throughout the growing season using a neutron probe and related to weed interference with the crop. Volumetric water content throughout the soil profile to a depth of 180 cm did not differ among treatments before the 5th or 6th week after cotton emergence. Greater water depletion occurred early in the season in plots containing devil's-claw which corresponded to a period of rapid weed growth. In plots containing only cotton, the largest reduction in water content occurred later in the season during peak bloom and early boll formation. Soil water content at depths greater than 105 cm remained unchanged in all plots throughout the season. Interference from devil's-claw reduced cotton lint yield 96% in 1986 and 46% in 1987. Higher rainfall and reduced weed populations in 1987 reduced the impact of weed interference on cotton lint yield.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A., Tripp, T. N., Wells, J. W., and Hammel, J. E. 1986. Effects of tillage on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference with soybeans (Glycine max) and soil water use. Weed Sci. 34:143149.Google Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C. and Chandler, J. M. 1984. Devilsclaw and wild okra competition with cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:312.Google Scholar
3. Cooley, A. W., Smith, D. T., and Clark, L. E. 1973. Devils claw-germination, growth and competition. Pages 1417 in Weed and Herbicide Research in West Texas 1971-73. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Prog. Rep. PR-3201.Google Scholar
4. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and soybeans (Glycine max) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206212.Google Scholar
5. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Stone, J. F. 1988. Soil water relations of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 36:740746.Google Scholar
6. Jordan, W. R. 1986. Water deficits and reproduction. Pages 6372 in Mauney, J. R. and Stewart, J. M., eds. Cotton Physiology. The Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
7. Martin, W. C. and Hutchins, C. R. 1980. A flora of New Mexico. Vol. 2. Pages 18561859. J. Cramer, Vaduz, Germany.Google Scholar
8. Mercer, K. L., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Distance of influence of unicorn-plant (Proboscidea louisianica) on the production of cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:361.Google Scholar
9. Mercer, K. L., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1987. Interference of unicorn-plant (Proboscidea louisianica) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:807812.Google Scholar
10. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1935. Root development of weeds and crops in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agric. 16: 151160.Google Scholar
11. Shahi, H. N. 1978. Competitive effects of Chenopodium album for soil moisture and nutrients in wheat. Int. Pest Control 20(4): 14, 16.Google Scholar