Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:49:25.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population, Temperature, and Substrate Influences on Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) Seed Germination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Janis M. Farmer
Affiliation:
Standard Oil of Ohio, 4440 Warrensville Center Rd., Cleveland, OH 44128
Steven C. Price
Affiliation:
Standard Oil of Ohio, 4440 Warrensville Center Rd., Cleveland, OH 44128
C. Ritchie Bell
Affiliation:
Dep. Biol., Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514

Abstract

Seed from 21 common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L. # ASCSY) populations from six states were germinated on six substrates (filter paper, sand, peat, clay, and mixtures) under three temperature regimes. The variation in germination response between populations and experimental conditions was analyzed. The greatest percent germination (59% average over all substrates) was obtained with an alternating 20 C (16 h), 30 C (8 h) temperature regime. At a constant temperature of 30 C, germination was lower (32% average) and much more variable among seeds from different populations. At 25 C, average percent germination dropped to 1.2% over all substrates. Germination appeared to be strongly correlated with seed source (population), temperature, and substrate type, and poorly correlated with seed size. No association was found between geographical origin and germination response.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, R. P., Baladrin, M. F., and Martineau, J. R. 1984. The showy milkweed, Asclepias speciosa, a potential new semi-arid land crop for energy and chemicals. Biomass 4:81104.Google Scholar
2. Akpan, E. J. and Bean, E. W. 1977. The effects of temperature upon seed development in three species of forage grasses. Ann. Bot. 41:689695.Google Scholar
3. Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1977. Germination of common milkweed seeds. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 104:167170.Google Scholar
4. Berkman, B. 1949. Milkweed–a war strategic material and potential industrial crop for sub-marginal lands in the United States. Econ. Bot. 3:223239.Google Scholar
5. Bhowmik, P. C. 1978. Germination, growth and development of common milkweed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:493498.Google Scholar
6. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. 19. Asclepias syriaca L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:579589.Google Scholar
7. Buchanan, R. A., Cull, I. M., Otey, F. H., and Russell, C. R. 1978. Hydrocarbon and rubber producing crops. Evaluation of U.S. plant species. Econ. Bot. 32:131145.Google Scholar
8. Cavers, P. B. and Harper, J. L. 1966. Germination polymorphism in Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius . J. Ecol. 52:367382.Google Scholar
9. Cramer, G. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 29:636640.Google Scholar
10. Crouch, P. A. and Vander Kloet, S. P. 1980. Variation in seed characters in populations of Vaccinium section Cyanococcus (the Blueberries) in relation to latitude. Can. J. Bot. 58:8490.Google Scholar
11. Dorne, A. J. 1981. Variation in seed germination inhibition of Chenopodium bonus-henricus in relation to altitude of plant growth. Can. J. Bot. 59:18931901.Google Scholar
12. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1972. Germination and seedling development of common milkweed and other species. Weed Sci. 20:371378.Google Scholar
13. Jain, S. K. 1982. Variation and adaptive role of seed dormancy on some annual grassland species. Bot. Gaz. 143:101106.Google Scholar
14. Jeffrey, L. R. and Robison, L. R. 1971. Growth characteristics of common milkweed. Weed Sci. 19:193196.Google Scholar
15. Kigel, J., Ofir, M., and Koller, D. 1977. Control of the germination response of Amaranthus retroflexus L. seeds by their parental photothermal environment. J. Exp. Bot. 28:11251136.Google Scholar
16. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. 1975. Statistical package for the social sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 675 pp.Google Scholar
17. Oegema, T. and Fletcher, R. A. 1972. Factors that influence dormancy in milkweed seeds. Can. J. Bot. 50:713718.Google Scholar
18. Rorison, I. H. 1967. A seedling bioassay on some soils in the Sheffield areas. J. Ecol. 55:725741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sagar, G. R. and Harper, J. L. 1960. Factors affecting the germination and early establishment of plantains (Plantago lanceolata, P. media, and P. major). Pages 236245 in Harper, J. L., ed. The Biology of Weeds. Br. Ecol. Soc. Symp. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
20. Sawhney, R. and Naylor, J. M. 1979. Dormancy studies of Avena fatua. 9. Demonstration of genetic variability affecting the response to temperature during seed development. Can. J. Bot. 57:5963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Scheffe', H. 1953. A method for judging all contrasts in an analysis of variance. Biometrika 40:87104.Google Scholar
22. Stephenson, A. G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12:253279.Google Scholar
23. Stevens, O. A. 1932. The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. Am. J. Bot. 19:784794.Google Scholar