Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-bvkm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-31T00:34:46.868Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Intraspecific variability of the acetolactate synthase gene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Weilu Jiang
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
William L. Patzoldt
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Terry R. Wright
Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268


Common ragweed and common cocklebur plants were collected at two sites each in Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio to analyze intraspecific variability of the gene encoding acetolactate synthase (ALS). A 385-nucleotide fragment within the coding sequence of ALS was compared among 24 plants of each of these two species from the six locations. Common ragweed ALS was highly variable, with polymorphisms observed at 48 (12.5%) of the 385 nucleotides among the 24 plants. Despite the numerous nucleotide polymorphisms, only two inferred amino acid polymorphisms were identified. No apparent population structure was suggested by the ALS sequence data, indicating widespread gene flow consistent with the wind-pollinated nature of common ragweed. In contrast to common ragweed, no ALS polymorphisms were identified among the common cocklebur plants used in this study. As a basis for comparing the extremes observed between common ragweed and common cocklebur, ALS intraspecific variability also was investigated in 10 plants each of tall waterhemp and smooth pigweed. Normalized to the number of plants analyzed, the number of nucleotide polymorphisms for both tall waterhemp and smooth pigweed was greater than that in common cocklebur but less than that observed in common ragweed. Information on variability of herbicide target-site genes may be useful in predicting the likelihood for herbicide-resistance development. However, all four of the species investigated in this study have evolved resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides, despite the different levels of ALS variability observed.

Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Literature Cited

Barrentine, W. L., Soignier, S. S., and Kilen, T. C. 1995. Characterization of a common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) biotype resistant to the imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 35:135.Google Scholar
Bassett, I. J. and Crompton, C. W. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Can. J. Plant Sci 55:463476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, P., Woodworth, A. R., Rosen, B. A., Subramanian, M. V., and Siehl, D. L. 1995. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J. Biol. Chem 270:1738117385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutsalis, P., Karotam, J., and Powles, S. B. 1999. Molecular basis of resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Sisymbrium orientale and Brassica tournefortii . Pestic. Sci 55:507516.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, D. and Wright, S. I. 2001. Breeding systems and genome evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 11:685690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:1315.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Vigue, G., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Tranel, P. J. 1999. A kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotype resistant to triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 47:2027.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Hoffman, D. L. 1992. DNA sequence variation in Domain A of the acetolactate synthase genes of herbicide-resistant and -susceptible weed biotypes. Weed Sci 40:670676.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Stoller, E. W. 1997. Waterhemp Management in Agronomic Crops. Bulletin X855. Urbana, IL: Information Services, College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois. 11 p.Google Scholar
Hartl, D. L. and Clark, A. G. 1989. Principles of Population Genetics. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. p. 84.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2003. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Brûlé-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44:176193.Google Scholar
Karis, P. O. 1995. Cladistics of the subtribe Ambrosiinae (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Syst. Bot 20:4054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linhart, Y. B. and Grant, M. C. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 27:237277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, G. F. and Marshall, D. R. 1978. Allozyme uniformity within and variation between races of the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium L. (noogoora burr). Aust. J. Biol. Sci 31:283291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzoldt, W. L. and Tranel, P. J. 2002. Molecular analysis of cloransulam resistance in a population of giant ragweed. Weed Sci 50:299305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzoldt, W. L., Tranel, P. J., Alexander, A. L., and Schmitzer, P. R. 2001. A common ragweed population resistant to cloransulam-methyl. Weed Sci 49:485490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzoldt, W. L., Tranel, P. J., and Hager, A. G. 2002. Variable herbicide responses among Illinois waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus) populations. Crop Prot 21:707712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, D. B. and Clark, L. G. 2001. Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus—one species or two? J. Torrey Bot. Soc 128:282296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C. and Powles, S. B. 2002. Evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds: initial frequency of target site-based resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in Lolium rigidum . Heredity 88:813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, M. E., Schmitzer, P. R., Alexander, A. L., and Dorich, R. A. 2000. Identification and management of resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 40:42.Google Scholar
Senchina, D. S., Alvarez, I., and Cronn, R. C. et al. 2003. Rate variation among nuclear genes and the age of polyploidy in Gossypium . Mol. Biol. Evol 20:633643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibony, M., Michel, A., Haas, H. U., Rubin, B., and Hurle, K. 2001. Sulfometuron-resistant Amaranthus retroflexus: cross-resistance and molecular basis for resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Res 41:509522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibony, M. and Rubin, B. 2003. Molecular basis for multiple resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides and atrazine in Amaranthus blitoides (prostrate pigweed). Planta 216:10221027.Google Scholar
Tan, M. K. and Medd, R. W. 2002. Characterisation of the acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene of Raphanus raphanistrum L. and the molecular assay of mutation associated with herbicide resistance. Plant Sci 163:195205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, P. J. and Wassom, J. J. 2001. Genetic relationships of common cocklebur accessions from the United States. Weed Sci 49:318325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, P. J. and Wright, T. R. 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50:700712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and McWilliams, E. L. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 44. Amaranthus retroflexus L., A. powellii S. Wats. and A. hybridus L. Can. J. Plant Sci 60:12151234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, A., Bernasconi, P., Subramanian, M., and Rosen, B. 1996. A second naturally occurring point mutation confers broad-based tolerance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors. Plant Physiol 111:S105.Google Scholar
Wright, T. R., Bascomb, N. E., Sturner, S. F., and Penner, D. 1998. Biochemical mechanism and molecular basis for ALS-inhibiting herbicide resistance in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) somatic cell selection. Weed Sci 46:1323.Google Scholar