Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-k7d4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-05T23:17:21.269Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: Variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Christine A. Curcio
Departments of Ophthalmology and Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
Kenneth R. Sloan
Computer and Information Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham


Disorder in the packing geometry of the human cone mosaic is believed to help alleviate spatial aliasing effects. To characterize cone packing geometry, we gathered positions of cone inner segments at seven locations along four primary and two oblique meridians in an adult human retina. We generated statistical descriptors based on the distribution of distances and angles to Voronoi neighbors. Parameters of a compressed-jittered model were fit to the actual mosaic. Local anisotropics were investigated using correlograms. We find that (1) median distance between Voronoi neighbors increases with eccentricity, but the minimum distance is constant (6–8 μm) across peripheral retina; (2) the cone mosaic is least compressed and jittered at the edge of the foveal rod-free zone; (3) disorder in the foveal center resembles that described by Pu m et al. (1990); (4) cone spacing is 10–15% less in one direction than in the orthogonal direction; and (5) cone spacing is greater in the radial direction (along meridians) than in the tangential direction (along lines of isoeccentricity). The nearly constant minimum distance implies that high spatial frequencies may be sampled even in peripheral retina. Local anisotropy of the cone mosaic is discussed in relation to the growth of the primate retina during development and to the orientation biases of retinal ganglion cells.

Research Articles
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ahnelt, P., Keri, C. & Kolb, H. (1990). Identification of pedicles of putative blue-sensitive cones in the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 293, 3953.Google Scholar
Ahnelt, P.K. & Pflug, R. (1986). Telodendrial contacts between foveolar cone pedicles in the human retina. Experientia 42, 298300.Google Scholar
Ahumada, A.J. & Poirson, A. (1987). Cone sampling array models. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 14931502.Google Scholar
Ahumada, A.J. & Yellott, J.I. (1988). A connectionist model for learning receptor positions. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 29, 58.Google Scholar
Baylor, D.A., Fuortes, M.G.F. & O'Bryan, P.M. (1971). Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle. Journal of Physiology (London) 214, 265294.Google Scholar
Bennett, P.J. & Banks, M.S. (1991). The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination. Vision Research 31, 17591786.Google Scholar
Berardi, N. & Fiorentini, A. (1991). Visual field asymmetries in pattern discrimination: A sign of asymmetry in cortical visual field representation? Vision Research 31, 18311836.Google Scholar
Borwein, B. (1981). The retinal receptor: A description. In Vertebrate Photoreceptor Optics, ed. Enoch, J.M. & Tobey, F.L. pp. 1181. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bossomaier, T.R.J. & Snyder, A.W. (1985). Irregularity and aliasing: Solution? Vision Research 25, 145147.Google Scholar
Boycott, B.B., Hopkins, J.M. & Sperling, H.G. (1987). Cone connections of the horizontal cells of the rhesus monkey's retina. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 229, 345379.Google Scholar
Carras, P.L. & Devoe, R.D. (1991). Directionally asymmetric responses to motion in cones. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 32, 906.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.I. (1989). Interphotoreceptor contacts at the inner segment level in primate retinas. Brain Research 490, 200203.Google Scholar
Coletta, N.J. & Williams, D.R. (1987). Psychophysical estimate of extrafoveal cone spacing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 15031513.Google Scholar
Costaridou, L., Stefanou, S., Hirsch, J. & Orphanoudakis, S. (1990). Image reconstruction based on human and monkey cone mosaics. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 1, 137152.Google Scholar
Curcio, C.A. (1987). Diameters of presumed cone apertures in human retina. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 83.Google Scholar
Curcio, C.A. & Allen, K.A. (1990). Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 300, 525.Google Scholar
Curcio, C.A., Sloan, K.R., Kalina, R.E. & Hendrickson, A.E. (1990). Human photoreceptor topography. Journal of Comparative Neurology 292, 497523.Google Scholar
Curcio, C.A., Allen, K.A., Sloan, K.R., Lerea, C.L., Hurley, J.B., Klock, I.B. & Milam, A.H. (1991). Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin. Journal of Comparative Neurology 312, 611625.Google Scholar
Curcio, C.A., Packer, O. & Kalina, R.E. (1987a). A whole mount technique for sequential analysis of photoreceptor and ganglion cell topography in a single retina. Vision Research 27, 915.Google Scholar
Curcio, C.A., Sloan, K.R. Jr, Packer, O., Hendrickson, A.E. & Kalina, R.E. (1987b). Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236, 579582.Google Scholar
Detwiler, P.B. & Hodgkin, A.L. (1979). Electrical coupling between cones in turtle retina. Journal of Physiology (London) 291, 75100.Google Scholar
Drasdo, N. & Fowler, C.W. (1974). Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye. British Journal of Ophthalmology 58, 709714.Google Scholar
French, A.S., Snyder, A.W. & Stavenga, D.G. (1977). Image degradation by an irregular retinal mosaic. Biological Cybernetics 27, 229233.Google Scholar
Galvin, S.J. & Williams, D.R. (1991). The inconspicuousness of aliasing in extrafoveal spatial vision. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 32, 698.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Curcio, C.A. (1989). The spatial resolution capacity of the human fovea. Vision Research 29, 10951101.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Hylton, R. (1984). Quality of the primate photoreceptor lattice and limits of spatial vision. Vision Research 24, 347355.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Miller, W.H. (1987). Does cone positional disorder limit resolution? Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 14811492.Google Scholar
Jennings, J.A. & Charman, W.N. (1981). Off-axis image quality in the human eye. Vision Research 21, 445455.Google Scholar
Kolb, H. & Dekorver, L. (1991). Midget ganglion cells of the parafovea of the human retina: A study by electron microscopy and serial section reconstructions. Journal of Comparative Neurology 303, 617636.Google Scholar
Kraft, T.W. & Burkhardt, D.A. (1986). Telodendrites of cone photoreceptors: structure and probable function. Journal of Comparative Neurology 249, 1327.Google Scholar
Krebs, I.P. & Krebs, W. (1989). Discontinuities of the external limiting membrane in the fovea centralis of the primate retina. Experimental Eye Research 48, 295301.Google Scholar
Krebs, W. & Krebs, I. (1991). Primate Retina and Choroid: Atlas of Fine Structure in Man and Monkey. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lerea, C.L., Bunt-Milam, A.H. & Hurley, J.B. (1989). Alpha transducin is present in blue-, green-, and red-sensitive cone photoreceptors in the human retina. Neuron 3, 367376.Google Scholar
Leventhal, A.G. & Schall, J.D. (1983). Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Comparative Neurology 220, 465475.Google Scholar
Levick, W.R. & Thibos, L.N. (1982). Analysis of orientation bias in cat retina. Journal of Physiology (London) 329, 243261.Google Scholar
Maloney, L.T. (1988). Spatially irregular sampling in combination with rigid movements of the sampling array. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 29, 58.Google Scholar
Nork, T.M., Mccormick, S.A., Chao, G.-M. & Odom, J.V. (1990). Distribution of carbonic anhydrase among human photoreceptors. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 31, 14511458.Google Scholar
Normann, R.A., Perlman, I., Kolb, H., Jones, J. & Daly, S. (1984). Direct excitatory interactions between cones of different spectral types in the turtle retina. Science 224, 625627.Google Scholar
Ohtsuka, T. & Kawamata, K. (1990). Telodendrial contact of HRP-filled photoreceptors in the turtle retina: Pathways of photoreceptor coupling. Journal of Comparative Neurology 292, 599613.Google Scholar
Packer, O., Hendrickson, A.E. & Curcio, C.A. (1990). Developmental redistribution of photoreceptors across the Macaca nemestrina (pigtail macaque) retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 298, 472493.Google Scholar
Pointer, J.S. & Hess, R.F. (1989). The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range. Vision Research 29, 11331151.Google Scholar
Polyak, S.L. (1941). The Retina. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pum, D., Ahnelt, P.K. & Grasl, M. (1990). Isoorientation areas in the foveal cone mosaic. Visual Neuroscience 5, 511523.Google Scholar
Raviola, E. & Gilula, N.B. (1973). Gap junctions between photoreceptor cells in the vertebrate retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 70, 16771681.Google Scholar
Raviola, E. & Gilula, N.B. (1975). Intramembrane organization of specialized contacts in the outer plexiform layer of the retina. Journal of Cell Biology 65, 192222.Google Scholar
Ringvold, A. & Davanger, M. (1989). Lateral cell connections at the inner segment level of human parafoveal photoreceptors. Ada Ophthalmologica 67, 430434.Google Scholar
Riley, B.D. (1981). Spatial Statistics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rodieck, R.W. (1991). The density recovery profile: A method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies. Visual Neuroscience 6, 95111.Google Scholar
Rodieck, R.W., Binmoeller, K.F. & Dineen, J. (1985). Parasol and midget ganglion cells of the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 233, 115132.Google Scholar
Rovamo, J., Virsu, V., Laurinen, P. & Hyvarinen, L. (1982). Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in the visual fields. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 23, 666670.Google Scholar
Samy, C.N. & Hirsch, J. (1989). Comparison of human and monkey retinal photoreceptor sampling mosaic. Visual Neuroscience 3, 281285.Google Scholar
Schall, J.D., Perry, V.H. & Leventhal, A.G. (1986). Retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields in Old-World monkeys are oriented radially. Brain Research 368, 1823.Google Scholar
Scobey, R.P. & Van Kan, P.L.E. (1991). A horizontal strip of displacement sensitivity in the human visual field. Vision Research 31, 99109.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M.B., Schein, S.J. & De Monasterio, F.M. (1985). Regularity and structure of the spatial pattern of blue cones of macaque retina. Journal of the American Statistical Association 80, 803812.Google Scholar
Sloan, K.R., Curcio, C.A. & Meyers, D.A. (1989). Models for cone packing geometry in human retina. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 30, 347.Google Scholar
Smith, E.L. III, Chino, Y.M., Ridder, W.H. III, Kitagawa, K. & Langston, A. (1991). Orientation bias of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. Visual Neuroscience 5, 525545.Google Scholar
Smith, R.G. & Sterling, P. (1990). Cone receptive field in cat retina computed from microcircuitry. Visual Neuroscience 5, 453461.Google Scholar
Snyder, A.W. & Miller, W.H. (1977). Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. Journal of the Optical Society of America 67, 696698.Google Scholar
Snyder, A.W. & Miller, W.H. (1978). Telephoto lens system of falconiform eyes. Nature 275, 127129.Google Scholar
Snyder, A.W., Bossomaier, T.R.J. & Hughes, A. (1986). Optical image quality and the cone mosaic. Science 231, 499500.Google Scholar
Soodak, R.E., Shapley, R.M. & Kaplan, E. (1987). Linear mechanism of orientation tuning in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 58, 267275.Google Scholar
Temme, L.A., Malcus, L. & Noell, W.K. (1985). Peripheral visual field is radially organized. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 62, 545554.Google Scholar
WÄSsle, H. & Reimann, H.J. (1978). The mosaic of nerve cells in the retina. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (London) 200, 441461.Google Scholar
Watanabe, M. & Rodieck, R.W. (1989). Parasol and midget ganglion cells of the primate retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 289, 434454.Google Scholar
Williams, D.R. (1985). Aliasing in human foveal vision. Vision Research 25, 195205.Google Scholar
Williams, D.R. (1988). Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eye. Vision Research 28, 433454.Google Scholar
Williams, D.R. & Coletta, N.J. (1987). Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 15141522.Google Scholar
Yap, Y.L., Levi, D.M. & Klein, S.A. (1987). Peripheral hyperacuity: Isoeccentric bisection is better than radial bisection. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 15621567.Google Scholar
Yellott, J.I., Jr. (1982). Spectral analysis of spatial sampling by photoreceptors: Topological disorder prevents aliasing. Vision Research 22, 12051210.Google Scholar
Yellott, J.I., JR. (1987). Consequences of spatially irregular sampling for reconstruction of photon noisy images. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 28, 137.Google Scholar
Young, H.M. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1991). Cone photoreceptors lacking oil droplets in the retina of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Monotremata). Visual Neuroscience 6, 409420.Google Scholar