Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:01:23.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Arnold and the Mirror of History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2010

A. Dwight Culler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most dramatic moments in Victorian literature is that in the Apologia pro Vita Sua in which Newman first expresses doubt about the tenablehess of his position in the Anglican Church. It was die summer of 1839 and he was proposing to spend die time quietly, reading in his favorite subject, die history of the early church. As he began to go more deeply into the matter, however, he became uneasy, and by the end of August he was seriously alarmed. “My stronghold,” he says, “was Antiquity; now here, in the middle of die fifth century, I found, as it seemed to me, Christendom of die sixteenth and die nineteenth centuries reflected. I saw my face in that mirror, and I was a monophysite.” It is true, the impact of this passage is somewhat diminished for the modern reader by his uncertainty what a Monophysite is. Even after he has done his researches and learned that a Monophysite is one who believed in the one, not the two, natures of Christ, he is little better off, for Newman was not concerned widi the doctrinal question. He was concerned with the relationship of the parties one to anodier and with the fact that, if an extreme version of a position was heretical, then a moderate version of that position was heretical too. “It was difficult,” he wrote, “to make out how the Eutychians or Monophysites were heretics, unless Protestants and Anglicans were heretics also; … There was an awful similitude, more awful, because so silent and unimpassioned, between die dead records of die past and the feverish chronicle of the present. The shadow of the fifth century was on the sixteenth. It was like a spirit rising from the troubled waters of the old world, with die shape and lineaments of the new.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 10 , Spring 1982 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Newman, J. H., Apologia pro Vita Sua, ed. Culler, A. Dwight (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1956), p. 121.Google Scholar

2. Newman, pp. 122–23.

3. Newman, pp. 124–25.

4. Arnold, Thomas, “The Oxford Malignants and Dr. Hampden,” Edinburgh Review, 63 (April 1836), 234.Google Scholar The essay is reprinted in the American edition of Arnold's Miscellaneous Works(New York: D. Appleton, 1845).Google Scholar

5. Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, III, in Works, Centenary ed. (London: Chapman and Hall, 1899), XXVIII, 43Google Scholar; A. H. Clough, The Bothie of Tober-na-Vuolich, IX, 48–54; Newman, J. H., Sermons, Chiefly on the Theory of Religious Belief (Oxford: Rivington, 1843), p. 193.Google Scholar

6. Works (London: Moxon, 1846), 1, 144.Google Scholar

7. Stanley, Arthur P., The Life and Correspondence of Thomas Arnold, D.D., 2nd ed. (London: B. Fellowes, 1844), 1, 200.Google Scholar

8. Stanley, I, 49.

9. Stanley, I, 401.

10. Thucydides, , History of the Peloponnesian War, ed. Arnold, Thomas, 4th ed. (Oxford: H. and J. Parker, 1857), 1, 503–24Google Scholar; reprinted in Arnold's Miscellaneous Works (1845), pp. 79—111.

11. Thucydides, History, ed. Arnold, 111, 519.

12. Arnold, T., Review of B. G. Neibuhr's History of Rome, Quarterly Review, 32 (June 1825), 76.Google Scholar

13. Thucydides, History, ed. Arnold, 111, 522.

14. Arnold, T., Preface to the Third Volume of the Edition of Thucydides, Miscellaneous Works (1845), pp. 396–97.Google Scholar

15. Arnold, T., “Rugby School-Use of the Classics,” Miscellaneous Works (1845), p. 359.Google Scholar

16. Arnold, Matthew, Complete Prose Works, ed. Super, R. H. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962), p. 136.Google Scholar

17. M. Arnold, Complete Prose Works, 1, 225; Arnold, M., Letters to Arthur Hugh Clough, ed. Lowry, H. F. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932), p. 164.Google Scholar

18. M. Arnold, Complete Prose Works,1, 34.

19. Stanley, Life and Correspondence of Thomas Arnold, 2nd ed., 1, 55.

20. Arnold, M., Letters, 1848–1888, ed. Russell, G. W. E. (London: Macmillan, 1895), 11, 5.Google Scholar