Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:39:35.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SCRUTINIZING THE BATTLE OF DORKING: THE ROYAL UNITED SERVICE INSTITUTION AND THE MID-VICTORIAN INVASION CONTROVERSY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2011

A. Michael Matin*
Affiliation:
Warren Wilson College

Extract

The first major example in what would become a long line of popular pre-1914 British invasion-scare narratives was the inflammatory 1871 tale The Battle of Dorking: Reminiscences of a Volunteer. Through its vivid depiction of a German invasion and conquest of Britain, this story was designed to serve as a warning to Britons about the necessity of securing the nation's defenses. The dramatic impact of this work on the Victorian reading public and the political culture of the era has been treated by a number of scholars, most notably I. F. Clarke. Yet little attention has been accorded to the reaction it elicited from the professional peers of its author, Lieutenant-Colonel George Chesney. This interdisciplinary essay – which joins the study of literature with military history and politics – seeks to shed new light on the circumstances surrounding this extraordinarily influential tale, as well as on the genre it popularized, in large part by examining its reception by British officers. It begins by describing the tale's prehistory and emergence into widespread popularity and then evaluates the work's reception within armed forces circles. Some of the most trenchant assessments of this literary text, it turns out, were delivered within the austere confines of the Royal United Service Institution, a body whose meetings functioned as the crucible in which British military and naval judgments were forged.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Adams, R. J. Q., and Poirier, Philip P.. The Conscription Controversy in Great Britain, 1900–18. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
After the Battle of Dorking; or, What Became of the Invaders! London: George Maddick, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Andrew, Christopher. Her Majesty's Secret Service: The Making of the British Intelligence Community. 1985. New York: Viking, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Annual Register 1 (1871): 108. Print.Google Scholar
Arthur, Rear-Admiral W.The Defence of the Coasts of England, Ireland, and Scotland in the Event of War.” Journal of the Royal United Service Institution 30 (1886–87): 671–94. Print.Google Scholar
Baden-Powell, General Robert. Scouting for Boys: A Handbook for Instruction in Good Citizenship. 1908. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R.Fear's Empire: War, Terrorism, and Democracy. New York: Norton, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Barrington, Captain J. T.England on the Defensive; or, The Problem of Invasion Critically Examined under the Aspect of a Series of Military Operations. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, 1881. Print.Google Scholar
Battle of Dorking, A Myth; England Impregnable: Invasion Impossible. London: Simpkin, Marshall, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jean de [Ivan S. Bloch]. “The Transvaal War: Its Lessons in Regard to Militarism and Army Re-Organisation.” Journal of the Royal United Service Institution 45 (1901): 1316–44, 1413–51. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Bookbuyer's Guide 7 (September 1871): 10. Print.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna. Fear: A Cultural History. 2005. Emeryville: Shoemaker & Hoard, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
[Chesney, Lieutenant-Colonel George Tomkyns]. “The Battle of Dorking: Reminiscences of a Volunteer.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 109.667 (May 1871): 539–72. Print.Google Scholar
[Chesney, Lieutenant-Colonel George Tomkyns]. “By the Author of ‘The Battle of Dorking.’” The New Ordeal. Edinburgh: William Blackwood & Sons, 1879. Print.Google Scholar
[Chesney, Lieutenant-Colonel George Tomkyns]. “The Writer of the Tale in ‘Blackwood’ [sic].” “The Battle of Dorking.” Spectator (3 June 1871): 671. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.The Battle of Dorking: Second Thoughts.” Extrapolation 40.4 (Winter 1999): 277–83. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.. “Before and After The Battle of Dorking.” Science Fiction Studies 24.1 (March 1997): 3346. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.. “Future-War Fiction: The First Main Phase, 1871–1900.” Science Fiction Studies 24.3 (Nov. 1997): 387412. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.. “Trigger-Happy: An Evolutionary Study of the Origins and Development of Future-War Fiction, 1763–1914.” Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 20.2 (1997): 117–36. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.. Voices Prophesying War: Future Wars 1763–3749. 1966. Revised ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F., ed. The Battle of Dorking and When William Came. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.. British Future Fiction: 1700–1914, vol. 6. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Clarke, I. F.. The Tale of the Next Great War, 1871–1914. Liverpool and Syracuse: Liverpool UP and Syracuse UP, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
“The Cobden Club.” The Burden of Armaments: A Plea for Retrenchment. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1905. Print.Google Scholar
Cobden, Richard. The Three Panics: An Historical Episode (1862). The Political Writings of Richard Cobden. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1903. 2: 537704. Print.Google Scholar
Collinson, Major-General T. B.On the Present Facilities for the Invasion of England, and for the Defence Thereof.” Journal of the Royal United Service Institution 21 (1878): 191. Print.Google Scholar
Colomb, Rear-Admiral Philip et al. The Great War of 189 –: A Forecast. London: William Heinemann, 1893. Serialized as The Great War of 1892 in Black and White (1892). Print.Google Scholar
Concord: The Journal of the International Arbitration and Peace Association (16 March 1892): 58. Print.Google Scholar
Dixon, Edward T. “Finis Britanniae: Extract from One of a Series of Popular Lectures on Modern History, Delivered at Harvard, A. D. 1935.” National Defence (March 1909): 482–90. Print.Google Scholar
“An Englishman and Civilian.” The Invasion of England, Considered in a Letter and Postscript to “The Times,” . . . Containing the Opinions of the Duke of Wellington, and of Other Officers of Distinction, on This Important Subject. London: J. Ridgway, 1852. Print.Google Scholar
Fergusson, James. The Peril of Portsmouth; or, French Fleets and English Forts. 1852. 3rd ed.London: John Murray, 1853. Print.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, David. “From Textuality to Orality – The Reception of The Battle of Dorking.” Books and Bibliography: Essays in Commemoration of Don McKenzie. Ed. Thomson, John. Wellington: Victoria UP, 2002. 87102. Print.Google Scholar
Furedi, Frank. Invitation to Terror: The Expanding Empire of the Unknown. London: Continuum, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. G.The Life of Sir William Harcourt. Vol. 2. London: Constable, 1923. Print.Google Scholar
Gooch, John. The Prospect of War: Studies in British Defence Policy 1847–1942. London: Frank Cass, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Robert J.Under the Deep Deep Sea, The Story of the Channel Tunnel. London: Moffatt & Paige, 1887. Print.Google Scholar
Harcourt, William Vernon. “The Difficulties of Invasion.” London Times (24 May 1872): 8. Print.Google Scholar
Harcourt, William Vernon. “England in 1802 and 1872.” London Times (16 Jan. 1872): 4. Print.Google Scholar
Harcourt, William Vernon. “Mr. Vernon Harcourt and Colonel Baker.” London Times (5 June 1872): 6. Print.Google Scholar
Harcourt, William Vernon. “Our Naval and Military Establishments Regarded with Reference to the Dangers of Invasion.” Journal of the Royal United Service Institution 16 (1873): 575632. Print.Google Scholar
Head, Francis B.The Defenceless State of Great Britain. London: John Murray, 1850. Print.Google Scholar
Hemyng, Bracebridge. The Commune in London; or, Thirty Years Hence: A Chapter of Anticipated History. London: C. H. Clarke, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Hickson, Colonel S. A. Einem. “Invasion and the Laws of Probability.” National Defence (Nov. 1909): 429–38. Print.Google Scholar
Hirst, F. W.The Six Panics and Other Essays. London: Methuen, 1913. Print.Google Scholar
A History of the Sudden and Terrible Invasion of England by the French, in the Month of May, 1852. London: T. Bosworth, 1851. Print.Google Scholar
Hynes, Samuel. The Edwardian Turn of Mind. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
The Invasion of 1883: A Chapter from the Book of Fate. Glasgow: James Maclehose, 1876. Print.Google Scholar
Lane-Poole, Stanley, and Falkner, James. “Chesney, Charles Cornwallis (1826–1876).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. 11: 325. Print.Google Scholar
Leighton, Sir Baldwyn. The Lull before Dorking. London: Richard Bentley & Son, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Longford, Elizabeth. Wellington: Pillar of State. New York: Harper & Row, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
Longmate, Norman. Island Fortress: The Defence of Great Britain, 1603–1945. London: Hutchinson, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
M., J. W.The Siege of London: Reminiscences of “Another Volunteer.” London: Robert Hardwicke, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Matin, A. Michael. “‘The Benefit and the Handicap of Hindsight’: Reassessing Future-War Fiction after the 9/11-Induced Shift to a U.S. National Security Strategy of Preemptive Attack and during Anticipations of an Emerging Era of Cyberwars.” Under submission.Google Scholar
Matin, A. Michael. “The Creativity of War Planners: Armed Forces Professionals and the Pre-1914 British Invasion-Scare Genre.” Forthcoming in ELH: English Literary History.Google Scholar
[Maude, Colonel F. N.]. The New Battle of Dorking. London: Grant Richards, 1900. Print.Google Scholar
[Maude, Colonel F. N.] “Notices of Books.” Journal of the Royal United Service Institution 38.199 (Sept. 1894): 1022. Print.Google Scholar
McLynn, Frank. Invasion: From the Armada to Hitler, 1588–1945. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
Minutes of Proceedings at the Navy League Conference to Consider the Position of This Country If Involved in War with Regard to the Adequacy 1. Of the Navy 2. Of the Food Supply. London: The Navy League; Thursday, 23 June 1898. Print.Google Scholar
Moltruhn, Maximilian [pseud.], The Other Side at the Battle of Dorking; or, The Reminiscences of an Invader. London: Whittaker, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Newton, Douglas J.British Labour, European Socialism, and the Struggle for Peace, 1889–1914. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Palliser, Major William. The Use of Earthen Fortresses for the Defence of London and as a Preventive against Invasion. London: W. Mitchell, Military Publishers, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
“The Passing of Jorkins.” National Defence (1910): 596–605. Print.Google Scholar
Playne, Caroline E.The Pre-War Mind in Britain: An Historical Review. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1928. Print.Google Scholar
“Posteritas” [pseud.]. The Siege of London. London: Wyman & Sons, 1885. Print.Google Scholar
Powell, G. H. Introduction. The Battle of Dorking. London: Grant Richards, 1914. Print.Google Scholar
Reiss, Tom. “Imagining the Worst: How a Literary Genre Anticipated the Modern World.” New Yorker (28 Nov. 2005): 106–14. Print.Google Scholar
Searle, G. R.A New England? Peace and War 1886–1918. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Shaw, George Bernard. Common Sense about the War. The New York Times History of the European War. New York: The New York Times, 1914. Print.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Stansky, Peter. “Harcourt, Sir William George Granville Venables Vernon (1827–1904).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. 25: 138–43. Print.Google Scholar
Stearn, Roger T.General Sir George Chesney.” Journal of the Society for Army History Research 75 (1997): 106–18. Print.Google Scholar
Stearn, Roger T.. “Chesney, Sir George Tomkyns (1830–1895).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. 11: 328–31. Print.Google Scholar
The Suggested Invasion of England by the Germans. London: Houlston & Sons, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R.Worst-Case Scenarios. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Suskind, Ron. The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11. 2006. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Tuchman, Barbara W.The Guns of August. 1962. New York: Ballantine Books, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Vagts, Alfred. A History of Militarism: Civilian and Military. 1937. Revised ed. New York: The Free Press, 1959. Print.Google Scholar
Vagts, Alfred. “Hopes and Fears of an American-German War, 1870–1915.” Political Science Quarterly 54.4 (Dec 1939): 514–35; 55.1 (March 1940): 53–76. Print.Google Scholar
What Happened After the Battle of Dorking. New York: George Routledge & Sons, 1871. Print.Google Scholar
Williams, Glyn, and Ramsden, John. Ruling Britannia: A Political History of Britain 1688–1988. London: Longman, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Wingfield-Stratford, Esmé. Before the Lamps Went Out. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1945. Print.Google Scholar
“Wyndham's Theatre.” London Times (28 Jan. 1909): 10. Print.Google Scholar