Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-5lzww Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-25T21:41:27.073Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2010

Sundeep Bisla*
York College/CUNY


In Walter C. Phillips's Classic Study of 1919, Dickens, Reade, and Collins, Sensation Novelists: A Study in the Conditions and Theories of Novel Writing in Victorian England, there comes an instant when the critic believes himself to have caught the last of his novelists in a moment of artlessness. Remarking on the comforting and seemingly-conformist opening of Wilkie Collins's No Name, Phillips comments that “in the early sixties . . . the popular drift toward realism – stories of domestic life – had compelled some modification of Collins's . . . original melodramatic scheme” (133). Collins's predilection for artfulness is well-established. Rejecting his suggestions for an earlier foreshadowing of the Dr. Manette subplot in A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens comments in October 1859, “I do not positively say that the point you put, might not have been done in your manner; but I have a very strong conviction that it would have been overdone in that manner.” He goes on to characterize Collins's suggested revision as potentially off-putting for the readership because it would inevitably be discovered and the situation consequently judged “too elaborately trapped, baited, and prepared” (Letters 9: 127). This essay is in a sense an exploration of the special utility inherent in Collins's elaborately prepared traps for the reader. The elaborate plan can sometimes go places, make certain philosophical critiques, that the accommodative plot cannot. Collins was not known to be a writer who changed course easily in the face of criticism. Thus, it is surprising to find Phillips, as well as other literary critics, taking his opening in No Name seriously and as a sort of conservative retreat on Collins's part. But traps being what they are, that is, made to be fallen into, Phillips's misunderstanding is understandable. The opening of No Name does most assuredly invite such an interpretation. I will be arguing here, however, that, far from attempting to accommodate a newly emergent popular Victorian domestic taste, and pulling back from a previous subversive stance, Collins especially in his opening but also throughout his non-canonical masterpiece is actually covertly attacking that taste at its very foundations.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Amidon, Stephen. “Wilkie Collins.” British Writers: Supplement VI. Ed. Parini, Jay. New York: Scribners, 2001. 91104.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Ashley, Robert. Wilkie Collins. London: Arthur Barker, 1952.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.. Sense and Sensibilia. Reconstructed from the Manuscript Notes by G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1964.Google Scholar
Bearn, Gordon C. F.Derrida Dry: Iterating Iterability Analytically.” Diacritics 25.3 (1995): 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedell, Jeanne F. “Wilkie Collins.” Twelve Englishmen of Mystery. Ed. Bargainnier, Earl F.. Bowling Green: Popular, 1984. 833.Google Scholar
Bisla, Sundeep. “Copy-Book Morals: The Woman in White and Publishing History.” Dickens Studies Annual 28 (1999): 103–49.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. Armadale. Ed. Sutherland, John. London: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. Basil. Ed. Goldman, Dorothy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. Memoirs of the Life of William Collins, Esq., R. A. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Moonstone: A Romance. Ed. Stewart, J. I. M.. London: Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. No Name. Ed. Ford, Mark. London: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. No Name. Ed. Blain, Virginia. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Woman in White. Ed. Sucksmith, Harvey Peter. [1980] Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Collins, William. Memoirs of a Picture. London: C. Stower, 1805.Google Scholar
David, Deirdre. “Rewriting the Male Plot in Wilkie Collins's No Name: Captain Wragge Orders an Omelette and Mrs. Wragge Goes into Custody.” Out of Bounds: Male Writers and Gender(ed) Criticism. Ed. Claridge, Laura and Langland, Elizabeth. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1990. 186–96.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Freud and the Scene of Writing.” Writing and Difference. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1978. 196231.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Corrected Ed. Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. [1974]; Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Monolingualism of the Other; or, The Prosthesis of Origin. Trans. Mensah, Patrick. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” Limited Inc. Ed. Graff, Gerald. Trans. Samuel Weber and Jeffrey Mehlman. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern UP, 1988. 123.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, and Ricoeur, Paul. “Philosophy and Communication: Round-table Discussion between Ricoeur and Derrida.” Trans. Leonard Lawlor. Imagination and Chance: The Difference between the Thought of Ricoeur and Derrida. Ed. Lawlor, Leonard. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992. 131–63.Google Scholar
[Dickens, Charles]. “The Sensational Williams.” All the Year Round 11 (1864): 1417.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Letters of Charles Dickens: Volume 9, 1859–1861. Ed. Storey, Graham. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. Introduction. Sense and Sensibility. By Jane Austen. Ed. Kinsley, James. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990. viixlvi.Google Scholar
Horne, Lewis. “Magdalen's Peril.” Dickens Studies Annual 20 (1991): 281–94.Google Scholar
Hyder, Clyde K.Wilkie Collins and The Woman in White.” PMLA 54.1 (1939): 297303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Anna. “A Victim in Search of a Torturer: Reading Masochism in Wilkie Collins's No Name.” Novel 33.2 (2000): 196211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, Helena. “‘There is no Friend Like a Sister’: Sisterhood as Sexual Difference.” ELH 56.2 (1989): 401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milley, H. J. W.The Eustace Diamonds and The Moonstone.Studies in Philology 36 (October 1939): 651–63.Google Scholar
Oliphant, Margaret. “Novels.” Blackwood's 94 (1863): 168–83.Google Scholar
Page, Norman, ed. Wilkie Collins: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Catherine. The King of Inventors: A Life of Wilkie Collins. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Walter C. Dickens, Reade, and Collins, Sensation Novelists: A Study in the Conditions and Theories of Novel Writing in Victorian England. New York: Columbia UP, 1919; New York: Russell & Russell, 1962.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. “The Ideology of Speech-Act TheoryCentrum NS 1 (1981): 518.Google Scholar
Pykett, Lyn. “Collins and the Sensation Novel.” The Cambridge Companion to Wilkie Collins. Ed. Taylor, Jenny Bourne. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 5064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stange, G. Robert. Rev. of Dover ed. of No Name, Nineteenth-Century Fiction 34.1 (1979): 96100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jenny Bourne. In the Secret Theatre of Home: Wilkie Collins, Sensation Narrative, and Nineteenth-century Psychology. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. An Autobiography. Ed. Sadleir, Michael and Page, Frederick. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard. “Modern Novels: Rev. of ‘Northanger Abbey’ and ‘Persuasion.’ By the Author of ‘Sense and Sensibility,’ ‘Pride and Prejudice,’ ‘Mansfield Park,’ and ‘Emma.’ 4 vols. New Edition.” Quarterly Review 24 (January 1821): 352–76.Google Scholar