Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:07:10.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Population Trend in England between 1300 and 1348

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Barbara F. Harvey
Affiliation:
Somerville College, Oxford

Extract

It is now widely agreed that the economy of western Europe contracted in the later Middle Ages, but the causes of this depression and its time-limits are still disputed. Professor Postan argues that the depression was intimately connected with a decline in population beginning early in the fourteenth century and brought about by the operation of Malthusian checks and soil exhaustion. His argument may be briefly summarized. Population grew rapidly in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and the cultivated area was continuously extended. By 1300, however, both processes had gone too far. The plough had invaded marginal lands—in this context the term means poor lands—unsuited for permanent cultivation and subject to soil exhaustion. The precarious balance between population growth and the means of subsistence depended on the possibility of fresh colonization. When this was at an end, as it was, to all intents, by 1300, Europe was left with a population which it could not feed. Early in the fourteenth century, therefore—perhaps even in the 1290's—famine and disease brought about a long-continued rise in the death-rate, and this, later to be intensified by the plague, aggravated the decline in productivity. Thus the famine of the years 1315–17 was not merely a tragic episode of a kind likely to occur as long as the harvest of one year provided the bread of the next; it marked a turning-point in demographic history.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 23 note 1 Postan, M. M., ‘Histoire économique: Moyen Age’, IXe Congrès International des Sciences Historiques, i, Rapports (Paris, 1950), pp. 225 ff.Google Scholar; ‘Some Economic Evidence of Declining Population in the Later Middle Ages’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., ii (1950), pp. 221–46; ‘Die wirtschaft-lichen Grundlagen der mittelalterlichen Gesellschaft’, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, clxvi (1954), pp. 180–205; Postan, and Titow, J., ‘Heriots and Prices on Winchester Manors’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xi (19581959), pp. 392410Google Scholar; Postan, , ‘Note’Google Scholar, ibid., 2nd ser., xii (1959–1960), pp. 77–82.

page 24 note 1 Rapports, p. 235; Cf. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, clxvi, p. 191.

page 25 note 1 Kosminsky, E. A., Studies in the Agrarian History of England in the Thirteenth Century (ed. Hilton, R. H., Oxford, 1956), p. 244.Google Scholar

page 25 note 2 Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xii, pp. 81–82 and note. Cf. Agricultural History Review, x (1962), pt. i, pp. 4–6.

page 26 note 1 P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice], Duchy of Lancaster, 29/1/1, mm. 4, 5, 7.

page 26 note 2 Ministers' Accounts of the Earldom of Cornwall, 1296–93, ed. Midgley, L. M. (Camden 3rd ser., lxvi, lxviii, 1942, 1945), ii, p. 164Google Scholar, and passim.

page 26 note 3 W[estminster] A[bbey] M[uniments] 14777, 14780, 8940, 15420–34. Rotuli Hundredorum, ed. W. Illingworth and J. Caley (Record Commission, 1812–18), ii, p. 831. I am indebted to the Dean and Chapter of Westminster and to Mr L. E. Tanner, Librarian and Keeper of the Muniments, for permission to use the Abbey muniments.

page 26 note 4 Merton College, Oxford, Muniments 5638; Raftis, J. A., Estates of Ramsey Abbey (Toronto, 1957), pp. 238, 248–49.Google Scholar I am indebted to the Warden and Fellows of Merton College, and in particular to Dr R. L. Highfield, Librarian of the College, for permission to use the Cheddington MSS.

page 26 note 5 Morgan, M., English Lands of the Abbey of Bee (Oxford, 1946), p. 109Google Scholar, note.

page 27 note 1 W.A.M. 8259; Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, ed. Toms, E. (Surrey Record Society, xxxviii, xlviii, 1937, 1954), iiGoogle Scholar, no. 1015.

page 27 note 2 Gras, N. S. B. and Gras, E. C., Economic and Social History of an English Village (Cambridge, Mass., 1930), p. 252.Google Scholar

page 27 note 3 W.A.M. 27469.

page 27 note 4 W.A.M. 26703.

page 28 note 1 Hallam, H. E., ‘Population Density in Medieval Fenland’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xiv (1961–62), pp. 7181.Google Scholar

page 28 note 2 Victoria History of the County of Lincoln, ii (London, 1906), p. 314, note; Darby, H. C., Medieval Fenland (Cambridge, 1940), p. 137.Google Scholar

page 28 note 3 For the households in 1287, see Hallam, , ‘Some Thirteenth-Century Censuses’, Economic History Review, 2nd sen, x (1957—58), p. 340.Google Scholar

page 29 note 1 W.A.M. 27470–78, 27413, 27415; Stoneleigh Leger Book, ed. Hilton, R. H. (Dugdale Society, xxiv, 1960), pp. xl–xliGoogle Scholar; Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xiv, pp. 78–79; cf. p. 76, note. For Stoneleigh, see also J. B. Harley, ‘Population Trends and Agricultural Developments from the Warwickshire Hundred Rolls of 1279’, ibid., 2nd ser., xi, pp. 8–18.

page 29 note 2 W.A.M. 27111.

page 29 note 3 W.A.M. 27469; Surrey Taxation Returns (Surrey Record Society, xviii, 1922), pp. 51–52.

page 30 note 1 Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, clxvi, p. 192.

page 31 note 1 Allison, K. J., ‘The Lost Villages of Norfolk’, Norfolk Archaeology, xxxi (1955–57), pp. 122–23.Google Scholar

page 31 note 2 Beresford, M. W., ‘The Lost Villages of Yorkshire’, Yorkshire Archaeological and Topographical Journal, xxxviii (1952–55), p. 290.Google Scholar This article names 328 deserted medieval village sites. Since 1955 more than 40 sites have been added to the list, but none of these has yet been dated precisely. (I am indebted to Professor Beresford for this information and for allowing me to see his revised, unpublished list of sites in all counties.)

page 31 note 3 Cf. Lennard, R., Rural England, 1086–1135 (Oxford, 1959), p. 8.Google Scholar

page 32 note 1 Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xii, p. 81.

page 32 note 2 Rotuli Chartarum, I, i (Record Commission, 1837), p. 132; Hoskins, W. G., ‘The Reclamation of the Waste in Devon, 1550–1800’, Economic History Review, xiii (1943), p. 88Google Scholar; cf. Hoskins, and Finberg, H. P. R., Devonshire Studies (London, 1952), pp. 318 ff.Google Scholar

page 33 note 1 W.A.M. 25428, 25432. For the field system here, see also W.A.M. 25424–27, 25429–31, 25433–43.

page 33 note 2 P.R.O., Special Collections, 6/871/14, 16; W.A.M. 26348. There were 72 acres, 3 roods of demesne in North Field, and all were cultivated again in 1346–48.

page 33 note 3 Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, i, no. 528; see also no. 240.

page 34 note 1 Nonarum Inquisitiones in Curia Scaccarii. Temp. Regis Edwardi III (Record Commission, 1807), p. 371; Salzmann, L. F., ‘The Inning of Pevensey Levels’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, liii (1910), pp. 38 ff.Google Scholar

page 34 note 2 Lancashire Inquests, Extents and Feudal Aids, pt. ii (A.D. 1310–a.d. 1333) (ed. Farrer, W., Lancashire and Cheshire Record Society, liv, 1907), pp. 173175Google Scholar; Honor and Forest of Pickering, ii, ed. R. B. Turton (North Riding Record Society, n.s., iv, 1897), pp. 239–40 and note.

page 34 note 3 Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, v (1322–1331), ed. Walker, J. W. (Yorkshire Archaeological Society, Record Ser., cix, 1945), p. 116.Google Scholar

page 34 note 4 Steers, J. A., The Coastline of England and Wales (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1964), pp. 6970Google Scholar; Ballard, A., ‘The Sussex Coast Line’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, liii, pp. 525.Google Scholar

page 35 note 1 Dudley Stamp, L., The Land of Britain, Its Use and Misuse (3rd edn, London, 1962), p. 377Google Scholar; Report of the Land Utilisation Survey of Britain, pt. lxxxi (1941), p. 378.

page 35 note 2 Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, i, nos 66, 133, 528, 536, 539, 636, etc.; ibid., ii, nos 1558, 1565; W.A.M. 15428 ff.

page 35 note 3 Victoria History of the County of Surrey, iii (London, 1911), p. 327; ibid., i (Westminster, 1902), p. 309.

page 35 note 4 Cf. W.A.M. 9287, 15340.

page 35 note 5 Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, ii, no. 1047.

page 36 note 1 W.A.M. 15429–31, 15433.

page 36 note 2 Honor and Forest of Pickering, ii, p. 248.

page 36 note 3 Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, v. pp. 71, 96; Honor and Forest of Pickering, ii, p. 242. See also Levett, A. E., Studies in Manorial History (Oxford, 1938), pp. 145, 191.Google Scholar

page 36 note 4 Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, i, nos 636, 639—40.

page 37 note 1 Page, F. M., Estates of Crowland Abbey (Cambridge, 1934), p. 385.Google Scholar

page 37 note 2 Economic History Review, 2nd ser., ii, p. 230.

page 37 note 3 Carus-Wilson, E. M. and Coleman, O., England's Export Trade, 1275–1547 (Oxford, 1963), pp. 4041, 47–48, 75–77.Google Scholar For what follows, see Carus-Wilson, E. M., Medieval Merchant Venturers (London, 1954), p. 242Google Scholar and note.

page 37 note 4 Lewis, G. R., The Stannaries: a Study of the English Tin Miner (Cambridge, Mass., 1924), p. 252.Google Scholar

page 38 note 1 Economic History Review, 2nd ser., ii, p. 233.

page 38 note 2 Ibid.; Essays in Economic History, ed. Carus-Wilson, E. M., ii (London, 1962), p. 193.Google Scholar

page 38 note 3 Two ‘Compoti’ of the Lancashire and Cheshire Manors of Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, xxiv and xxxiii Edward I, ed. P. A. Lyons (Chetham Society, cxii, 1884), p. no; Lanes. Inquests, Extents and Feudal Aids, ii, pp. 22, 186; ibid., iii (a.d. 1313–a.d. 1355), ed. Farrer (Lanes, and Cheshire Record Society, lxx, 1915), p. 138.

page 39 note 1 W.A.M. 26697, 26061, 26080, 8427, 8431, 14788, 27306, 27129, 8276, 21080, 25441—42.

page 39 note 2 Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, i and ii, passim.

page 39 note 3 Nichols, J. F., ‘An Early Fourteenth Century Petition from the Tenants of Bocking to their Manorial Lord’, Economic History Review, ii (19291930), p. 307Google Scholar; Page, op. cit., p. 356; cf. pp. 113–14.

page 39 note 4 Ibid., pp. 352, 369.

page 40 note 1 Hewitt, H. J., Mediaeval Cheshire (Manchester, 1929), p. 13.Google Scholar

page 40 note 2 P.R.O., Duchy of Lancaster, 30/43/494, mm. 4, 4d; Court Rolls of the Lordships, Wapentakes and Demesne Manors of Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, in the County of Lancaster, a.d. 1323–4, ed. W. Farrer (Lanes, and Cheshire Record Society, xli, 1901), pp. 30–33, 35–36, 73–74, etc.; Tupling, G. H., Economic History of Rossendale (Manchester, 1927), p. 35.Google Scholar

page 40 note 3 Court Rolls of the Manor of Wakefield, v, pp. 69 ff.

page 40 note 4 Honor and Forest of Pickering, i, ed. R. B. Turton (North Riding Record Society, n.s., ii, 1895), pp. 157–72.

page 40 note 5 P.R.O., Duchy of Lancaster, 30/129/1957, m. 2; Short History of the Rights of Common upon the Forest of Dartmoor and the Commons of Devon (Dartmoor Preservation Association, Plymouth, 1890), pp. 20–1; Oakley, R. H., ‘Atlow Court Rolls, 19 Edw. III—4 Ric.II’, Journal of the Derbyshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, lxxiii (1953), p. 92.Google Scholar

page 40 note 6 Landboc sive Registrum Monasterii Beatae Mariae Virginis et Sancti Cénhelmi de Winchelcumba, ed. D. Royce, ii (Exeter, 1903), pp. 207, 209; see also p. 211.

page 41 note 1 W.A.M. 27470 ff.; Chertsey Abbey Court Rolls Abstract, i, pp. 9, 11, 18, 25; ii, pp. 124, 137, etc.

page 41 note 2 Cartulary and Terrier of the Priory of Bilsington, Kent, ed. Neilson, N. (London, 1928), pp. 141–42Google Scholar; cf. pp. 146–47; Literae Cantuarienses, ed. J. B. Sheppard, i (Rolls Ser., 1887), pp. 139–41.

page 41 note 3 Sussex Archaeological Collections, liii, p. 44.

page 41 note 4 Darby, Medieval Fenland, p. 50.

page 41 note 5 Court Rolls of Tooting Beck Manor, ed. Gomme, G. L., i (London County Council, 1909), p. 244Google Scholar; Page, op. cit., p. 353; Manor of Manydown, Hampshire, ed. G. W. Kitchin (Hampshire Record Society, 1895), p. 133.

page 42 note 1 See Economic History Review, 2nd ser., ii, p. 245.

page 42 note 2 W.A.M. 25421 ff., 26259, 16396, 25800, 27408, 7790, 27317. The taking of land into the demesne since the making of the last rental accounts for some other ‘vacancies’ at Birdbrook in the early fourteenth century.

page 42 note 3 I am indebted to Lady de Villiers for her criticism of a draft of this paper.