Tom Burns ^{Reference Burns1} rightly draws our attention to the quiet revolution that removed continuity of care from consultant psychiatrists with the ‘functional split’ between in-patient and community services. Despite my initial vocal resistance to the model, now that it is established in my place of work, I would not want to go back to being the prime focus for hundreds of patients throughout their mental healthcare journey. Since the functional model was introduced, I have felt more able to do a good job. Service users may be less worried about this change than many service providers. ^{Reference Singhal, Garg, Rana and Naheed2}

Continuity of care through one person can reduce patient choice and lead to overdependent relationships. Second opinions are much easier to get when patients transfer between hospital and community. Care coordinators are slowly taking on continuity of care, although they sometimes struggle with the authority of consultants and managers. We can help ameliorate that by working in a cooperative and consultative style.

Some psychiatrists fear that the removal of consultant-centred continuity could help make psychiatrists redundant. Surely we need to value our expertise more than our personal carrying capacity. In future, we need to demonstrate our expert role by the good outcomes we achieve in collaboration with our teams, not simply by having lots of patients on our caseloads. We are better employed as consultants than care coordinators.

Locally, the functional model has enabled me to develop myself, my team and my service. The patient suicide rate has not increased. The more serious National Patient Safety Agency incidents (levels 3, 4 and 5) are less frequent. Patient and staff satisfaction is getting better. We could do more to address communication across the interfaces, but overall, my personal experience of the functional model has been positive.

I would prefer to improve the functional model, rather than re-combine hospital and community work. It would be satisfying to get it working well, before the next upheaval. In-patient consultants should give themselves leave in the community and community consultants should visit their colleagues in hospital. We should disentangle history taking and examination from engagement, so patients do not have to repeat their stories as they move between services - we could review our colleagues' notes with the patient rather than start afresh. It is a different way of working that allows us to be involved in the care of many service users, but as part of a team.

A US politician, Pauline R. Kezer said, ‘Continuity gives us roots; change gives us branches, letting us stretch and grow and reach new heights.’ There is value in continuity and value in change. The Royal College of Psychiatrists Occasional Paper, Looking Ahead, calls for a systematic review of models of mental healthcare using standardised outcomes. ³ However, at no point does the paper recommend that consultant psychiatrists again take on the central role of personally providing continuity of care for all patients. Instead, Looking Ahead explicitly values the expertise of consultant psychiatrists, our availability for rapid review and the advice we give to others (recommendation 3). That is something worth making a noise about.