Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T08:42:45.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Developmental Biology of Brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Gary Freeman
Gary Freeman*
Affiliation:
Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
Get access

Extract

The chapter on anatomy in the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Part H, Brachiopoda, revised) (Williams et al., 1997) is the most current and comprehensive treatment that we have of reproduction and development in these animals. My contribution to this short course is a commentary on and addendum to this review. The study of the developmental biology of extant brachiopods describes a large part of their life history and defines several of the parameters that have to be taken into account when thinking about how a given set of genes will make it to the next generation (Havenhand, 1995). Some extant brachiopod genera like Discinisca and Crania (Neocrania) belong to families that first appeared in the fossil record during the Lower Ordovician or, as in the case of Glottidia, to a superfamily that first appeared during the Lower Cambrian. Studies on the development of these extant animals provide a picture of what the development of their Lower Paleozoic ancestors might have been like.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 7: Brachiopods Ancient and Modern: A Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper , November 2001 , pp. 69 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, D. 1959. The growth of the lophophore and loop of the brachiopod Terebratalia transversa (Sowerby). Journal of Morphology, 105:401–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuang, S-H. 1977. Larval development in Discinisca (inarticulate brachiopod). American Zoologist, 17:39–53.Google Scholar
Chuang, S-H. 1990. Brachiopoda, p. 211–254. In Adiyodi, K.G. and Adiyodi, R. G. (eds.), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates Vol IV, Part B Fertilization, Development and Parental Care. Oxford & IBH Publ. Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Conklin, E. G. 1902. The embryology of the brachiopod Terebratulina septentrionalis Couthouy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 41:41–76.Google Scholar
Davidson, E. H., Peterson, K. J., and Cameron, R. A. 1995. Origin of adult bilaterian body plans: evolution of developmental regulatory mechanisms. Science, 270:1319–1325.Google Scholar
Franzen, A. 1969. On larval development and metamorphosis in Terebratulina Brachiopoda. Zoologiska. Bidrag fran Uppsala, 38:155–174.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 1993a. Metamorphosis of the brachiopod Terebratalia: evidence for a role of calcium channel function and the dissociation of shell formation from settlement. Biological Bulletin, 184:15–24.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 1993b. Regional specification during embryogenesis in the articulate brachiopod Terebratalia . Developmental Biology, 160:196–213.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 1994. The endocrine pathway responsible for oocyte maturation in the inarticulate brachiopod Glottidia . Biological Bulletin, 186:263–270.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 1995. Regional specification during embryogenesis in the inarticulate brachiopod Glottidia . Developmental Biology, 172:15–36.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 1999. Regional specification during embryogenesis in the inarticulate brachiopod Discinisca . Developmental Biology, 209:321–339.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. 2000. Regional specification during embryogenesis in the craniiform brachiopod Crania anomala . Developmental Biology, 227:219–238.Google Scholar
Freeman, G., and Lundelius, J. W. 1999. Changes in the timing of mantle formation and larval life history traits in linguliform and craniiform brachiopods. Lethaia, 32:197–217.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1991. The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: Why we strive to quantify morphospace. Paleobiology, 14:411–423.Google Scholar
Hammond, L. S. 1980. The larvae of a discinid (Brachiopoda: Inarticulata) from inshore waters near Townsville, Australia, with revised identifications of previous records. Journal of Natural History, 14:647–661.Google Scholar
Havenhand, J. 1995. Evolutionary ecology of larval types, p.79–122. In McEdward, L. (ed.), Ecology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Holmer, L. E., and Popov, L. E. 1996. Early Paleozoic radiation and classification of organo-phosphatic brachiopods, p. 117–121. In Cooper, P. and Jin, J. (eds.), Brachiopods. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Hoverd, W. A. 1985. Histological and ultrastructural observations of the lophophore and larvae of the brachiopod Notosaria nigricans (Sowerby 1846). Journal of Natural History, 19:831–850.Google Scholar
James, M. A., Ansell, A. D., Collins, M. J., Curry, G. B., Peck, L. S., and Rhodes, M. C. 1992. Biology of Living Brachiopods. Advances in Marine Biology, 28:175–387.Google Scholar
James, M. A., Ansell, A. D., and Curry, G. B. 1991. Oogenesis in the articulate brachiopod Terebratulina retusa . Marine Biology, 111:411–423.Google Scholar
Kalthoff, K. 2001. Analysis of Biological Development, second edition. McGraw Hill, New York, 790 p.Google Scholar
Kovalevskiy, M. 1883. Observations sur le developpement des Brachiopodes Analyse par MM Oehlert et Deniker. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generate (series 2), 1:57–76.Google Scholar
Kume, M. 1956. The Spawning of Lingula . Natural Science Report, Ochanomizu University, 6:215–223.Google Scholar
Long, J. A. 1964. The Embryology of Three Species Representing Three Superfamilies of Articulate Brachiopods. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Malakhov, V. V. 1976. Stages of embryogenesis in Cnismatocentrum sakhaliensis parvum (Brachiopoda, Testicardines) and the problem of the evolutionary origin of coelomic mesoderm (in Russian). Zoologicheski Zhurnal, 55:66–75.Google Scholar
Manahan, D. T. 1990. Adaptations by invertebrate larvae for nutrient acquisition from sea water. American Zoologist, 30:147–160.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C. 1991. The development of the brachiopod Crania (Neocrania) anomala (O.F. Muller) and its phylogenetic significance. Acta Zoologica, 72:7–28.Google Scholar
McCammon, H. M., and Reynolds, W. A. 1976. Experimental evidence for direct nutrient assimilation by the lophophore of articulate brachiopods. Marine Biology, 34:41–45.Google Scholar
Motchurova-Dekova, N. 1996. Late Cretaceous craniids (Brachiopoda) from northeast Bulgaria. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, 200:285–308.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C. 1998. Origin and evolution of animal life cycles. Biological Reviews, 73:125–155.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1963. Ecology of the brachiopod Glottidia pyramidata . Ecological Monographs, 33:87–213.Google Scholar
Pan, C-M., and Watabe, N. 1989. Periostracum formation and shell regeneration in the lingulid Glottidia pyramidata (Brachiopoda: Inarticulata). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 108:283–298.Google Scholar
Pennington, J. T., Tamburri, M. N., and Barry, J. P. 1999. Development, temperature tolerance and settlement preferences of embryos and larvae of the articulate brachiopod Laqueus californianus . Biological Bulletin, 196:245–256.Google Scholar
Percival, E. 1944. A contribution to the life-history of the brachiopod Terebratella inconspicua Sowerby. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 74:1–23.Google Scholar
Plenk, H. 1915. Die Entwicklung von Cistella (Argiope) neapolitana . Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Brachiopoden. Arbeiten aus dem Zoologischen Institut der Universitaet Wien, 20:83–108.Google Scholar
Popov, L. E., Holmer, L. E., and Bassett, M. G. 1996. Radiation of the earliest calcareous brachiopods, p.209–213. In Cooper, P. and Jin, J. (eds.), Brachiopods. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Sawada, N. 1973. Electron microscope studies on gametogenesis in Lingula unguis . (In Japanese). Zoological Magazine, 82:178–188.Google Scholar
Slack, J. M. W. 1991. From Egg to Embryo, second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 328 p.Google Scholar
Stricker, S. A., and Folsom, M. W. 1997. Oocyte maturation in the brachiopod Terebratalia trasversa: role of follicle cell-oocyte attachments during ovulation and germinal vesicle breakdown. Biological Bulletin, 193:324–340.Google Scholar
Stricker, S. A., and Reed, C. G. 1985a. The ontogeny of shell secretion in Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Articulata) I. Development of the mantle. Journal of Morphology, 183:233–250.Google Scholar
Stricker, S. A., and Reed, C. G. 1985b. The ontogeny of shell secretion in Terebratalia transversa (Brachiopoda, Articulata) II. Formation of the protegulum and juvenile shell. Journal of Morphology, 183:251–271.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1995. Why no new phyla after the Cambrian? Genome and ecospace hypotheses revisited. Palaios, 10:190–194.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1977. Differentiation and growth of the brachiopod mantle. American Zoologist, 17:107–120.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Carlson, S. J., Brunton, C. H. C., Holmer, L. E., and Popov, L. 1996. A supra-ordinal classification of the brachiopoda. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 351:1171–1193.Google Scholar
Williams, A., James, M. A., Emig, C. C., MacKay, S., and Rhodes, M. C. 1997. Anatomy, p.7–188. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, revised, Brachiopoda, Volume 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 1986. Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment and the innate-acquired distinction, p. 185–208. In Bechtel, W. (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Yatsu, N. 1902. On the development of Lingula anatina . Journal of the College of Science Imperial University Tokyo, 17(4):1–112.Google Scholar