Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:31:19.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why services cannot be the engine of growth for India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Chaitanya Talreja*
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India
Anirban Dasgupta
Affiliation:
South Asian University, India
*
Chaitanya Talreja, Assistant Professor of Economics, Economics at Centre for Regulatory Policy and Governance, School of Habitat Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, V.N. Purav Marg, Deonar, Mumbai 400088, India. Email: chaitanya4092@gmail.com

Abstract

India’s phenomenal service-led growth in recent decades has generated debate on the role of services vis-à-vis manufacturing as the engine of growth. With the rapidly increasing importance of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in global production systems since the 1990s, there have been claims of services having developed a growth dynamism similar to manufacturing. This article examines the role of services in India’s growth process using the concept of inter-sectoral linkages to make comparison with the role of manufacturing. Input-Output linkages and time series analysis reveal that services have been much less integrated in India’s production structure than manufacturing. They were also less important in generating indirect employment spillovers through sectoral linkages, compared with manufacturing. Service sector growth is found to be autonomously driven by final demand and therefore less dependent on its interconnections with the rest of the economy from the production side. The findings also indicate that service sector growth has stimulated manufacturing growth but not vice versa. However, the impact of services on manufacturing from the demand-side is neither sustainable nor desirable going forward. India is in urgent need of strategically developing its manufacturing sector through integrating dynamic services like ICT and internalising productivity gains. At the same time measures to address India’s inequality are critical to broaden the country’s demand base and make the growth process more sustainable and inclusive. In this sense, inequality reduction is a prerequisite for growth and should not be seen as an alternative to it.

Type
Contested terrains
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amirapu, A and Subramanian, A (2015) Manufacturing or services? An Indian illustration of a development dilemma. Working Paper No. 408. Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsden, AH (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York, NY: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Banerjee, R and Maheshwari, P (2020) Beyond headline GDP growth trends in income and consumption inequalities. Economic and Political Weekly 55(51): 1317.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, R (2003) Service intensities in the Indian economy: 1968/9–1993/4. Economic Systems Research 15(4): 427437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, A (2018) Household consumption patterns and the sectoral composition of growing economies: A review of the interlinkages. Available at: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/handle/10072/390502 (accessed 1 February 2022).Google Scholar
Das, M (2015) Intersectoral linkages in the Indian economy during the post-reform period. In: Patnaik, P (ed) Economics: Volume 3: Macroeconomics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 283301.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S and Singh, A (2005) Will services be the new engine of Indian economic growth? Development and Change 36(6): 10351057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, S and Singh, A (2006) Manufacturing, services and premature de-industrialization in developing countries: A Kaldorian empirical analysis. Working Paper No 327. Cambridge, UK: Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dev, SM and Sengupta, R (2020) Covid-19: Impact on the Indian economy. Working Paper No. 2020–013. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.Google Scholar
Driemeier, MH and Nayyar, G (2018) Trouble in the Making? The Future of Manufacturing-led Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, G and Gupta, P (2011a) The Service Sector as India’s Road to Economic Growth. Working Paper No. 16757. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, G and Gupta, P (2011b) The two waves of service-sector growth. Oxford Economic Papers 65(1): 96123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, W (2010) Applied Econometric Time Series. New Dehli: John Wiley and Sons, Wiley India.Google Scholar
Francois, J and Reinert, K (1996) The role of services in the structure of production and trade: Stylized facts from a cross-country analysis. Asia-Pacific Economic Review 2(1): 3543.Google Scholar
Gabriel, LF and de Santana Ribeiro, LC (2019) Economic growth and manufacturing: An analysis using panel VAR and intersectoral linkages. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 49(C): 4361.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ghani, E (2010) Is service-led growth a miracle for South Asia. In: Ghanieds, E (ed.) The Service Revolution in South Asia. New Dehli: Oxford University Press, pp. 35102.Google Scholar
Ghatak, M, Kotwal, A and Ramaswami, B (2020) What would make India’s growth sustainable? The India Forum. Available at: https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/macroeconomics/what-would-make-india-s-growth-sustainable.html (accessed 11 February 2022).Google Scholar
Ghose, AK (2015) Services-led growth and employment in India. In: Ramaswamy, KV (eds.) Labour, Employment and Economic Growth in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghose, AK (2016) India Employment Report 2016: Employment Challenge and the Imperative of Manufacturing-Led Growth. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghose, AK (2019a) Employment in India (Oxford India Short Introductions). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghose, AK (2019b) Economic development in China and India: A tale of great divergence. Working Paper No. WP01/2019. Delhi: Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar
Ghose, AK (2020) Structural Transformation of India’s Economy. Working Paper 01/2020. Delhi: Institute of Human Development.Google Scholar
Goyal, A (2013) India’s growth undershoots: Is this a new normal? East Asia Forum, 1 February. Available at: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/01/02/developments-and-challenges-in-india-a-reversion-to-fundamentals/ (accessed 11 February 2022).Google Scholar
Guerrieri, P and Meliciani, V (2005) Technology and international competitiveness: The interdependence between manufacturing and producer services Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16(4): 489502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansda, SK (2001) Sustainability of services-led growth: An input output analysis of the Indian Economy. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Paper 22: 73118.Google Scholar
Hirschman, AO (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N (1967) Strategic Factors in Economic Development. Ithaca, NY: New York State School of Industrial and Labour Relations, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Kucera, D and Jiang, X (2019) Structural transformation in emerging economies: Leading sectors and the balanced growth hypothesis. Oxford Development Studies 47(2): 188204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S (1966) Modern economic growth: Rate, structure and spread. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, WW (1946) Exports, imports, domestic output, and employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 60(2): 171193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lok Sabha Secretariat (2013) Information Bulletin-Indian Rupee vs US Dollar: Current Scenario. Lok Sabha Secretarial Research and Information Division, Government of India, LARRDIS No. 3/2013/EF.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S (2020) ‘Make in India’: The components of a manufacturing strategy for India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 63(1): 161176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, RE and Lahr, ML (2001) A taxonomy of extractions. In: Lahr, ML and Miller, RE (eds.) Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis: A Festschrift in Memory of Benjamin H Stevens. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 407441.Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance (2021) Inequality and growth: Conflict or convergence? In: Economic Survey 2020–21. Government of India.Google Scholar
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (2015) Indian Petroleum and Natural Gas Statistics 2015–16. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Economic and Statistics Division, Government of India.Google Scholar
Mohanty, D (2013) Indian inflation puzzle. Speech delivered at acceptance of Late Dr Ramchandra Parnerkar Outstanding Economics Award, RBI Monthly Bulletin. February 2013. Available at: https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Bulletin/PDFs/08BSP080213F.pdf (accessed 11 February 2022)Google Scholar
Park, SH (1987) Linkages between industry and services and their implications for urban employment generation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 30: 359379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, SH and Chan, KS (1989) A cross-country input-output analysis of inter-sectoral relationships between manufacturing and services and their employment implications. World Development 17(2): 199212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D (2016) Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth 21(1):133.Google Scholar
Saikia, D (2011) Analyzing inter-sectoral linkages in India. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(33): 67666775.Google Scholar
Sastry, DVS, Singh, B, Bhattacharya, K and Unnikrishnan, NK (2003) Sectoral linkages and growth prospects: Reflections on the Indian economy. Economic and Political Weekly 38(24): 23902397.Google Scholar
Singh, K and Saluja, MR (2016) Input–output table for India: 2013–14. Working Paper No. 111. National Council of Applied Economic Research.Google Scholar
Storm, S and Naastepad, CWM (2005) Strategic factors in economic development: East Asian industrialization 1950–2003. Development and Change 36(6): 10591094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temursho, U (2016) Backward and forward linkages and key sectors in the Kazakhstan economy. Joint Government of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank Knowledge and Experience Exchange Program (KEEP). Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/47110/47110-001-dpta-en_2.pdf (accessed 1 February 2022).Google Scholar
Tregenna, F (2008) Sectoral engines of growth in South Africa: An analysis of services and manufacturing. Research Paper No. 2008/98. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.Google Scholar
Tregenna, F (2015) Deindustrialisation, structural change and sustainable economic growth. Working Paper No. 032. Vienna: UNIDO, UNU-MERIT Working Papers.Google Scholar
Weiss, J and Jalilian, H (2016) Manufacturing as an engine of growth. In: Weiss, J and Tribe, M (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Industry and Development. London: Routledge, pp. 2637.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Talreja and Dasgupta supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 109.6 KB