Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:04:26.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade Unionists in Parliament and Macroeconomic Performance: Evidence from Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Michael Berlemann
Affiliation:
Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg
Klaus W. Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg

Abstract

This article focuses on the role of unionised members of parliament. While unions have a direct effect on the labour market via wage negotiations, they often also take part in political debates. In many countries, significant shares of the members of parliament are also members of a trade union. However, up to now little empirical evidence is available on the extent to which unionised members of parliament try to achieve union-specific goals and thereby influence the macroeconomic conditions of an economy. A recent study for Germany comes to the conclusion that union members in the Bundestag cannot be seen as the parliamentary arm of the trade unions. However, we present contradicting empirical results by showing that, in Germany at least, the degree of unionisation of parliamentary members has a negative impact on economic growth and increases inflation, while unemployment remains unaffected.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. (1987) ‘Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), pp. 651678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, G. S., Elsheikh, F. (1976) Union Growth and the Business Cycle: An Econometric Analysis, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bassanini, A., Duval, R. (2009) ‘Unemployment, institutions, and reform complementaries: Re-assessing the aggregate evidence for OECD countries’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), pp. 4059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodman, P. M. (1998) ‘Trade union amalgamations, openness and the decline in Australian trade union membership’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 24(1), pp. 1845.Google Scholar
Bruno, M., Sachs, J. (1985) Economics of World Stagflation, Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1965) ‘An economic theory of clubs’, Economica, 32(125), pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L., Booth, A., Burda, M., Checci, M., Naylor, R., Visser, J. (2001) ‘The future of collective bargaining in Europe’ in Boeri, T., Brugiavini, A., Calmfors, L. (eds) The Role of Unions in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1155.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L., Drifill, J. (1988) ‘Bargaining structure, corporatism, and macroeconomic performance’, Economic Policy, 6, pp. 1661.Google Scholar
Carruth, A., Disney, R. (1988) ‘Where have two million trade union members gone?’, Economica, 55(1), pp. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruth, A., Schnabel, C. (1990) ‘Empirical modelling of trade union growth in Germany, 1956–1986: Traditional versus cointegration and error correction methods’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 126(2), pp. 326346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checci, D., Nunziata, L. (2011) ‘Models of unionism and unemployment’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(2), pp. 141152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornes, R., Sandler, T. (1999) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Z., Tsiddon, D. (2004) ‘Macroeconomic consequences of terror: Theory and the case of Israel’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(5), pp. 9711002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F. (1887) The Condition of the Working Class in England, J. W. Lovell, New York.Google Scholar
Flanagan, R. J. (2005) ‘Has management strangled U.S. unions?’, Journal of Labor Research, 26(1), pp. 3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. B. (2005) ‘What Do Unions Do? The 2004 M-Brane Stringtwister Edition’, Journal of Labor Research, 26(4), pp. 641668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. B., Medoff, J. L. (1984) What Do Unions Do?, Basis Books, New York.Google Scholar
Hassel, A. (2005a) ‘Die Erosion der gewerkschaftlichen Lobbymacht’ in Leif, T., Späth, R. (eds) Die fünfte Kolonne. Lobbyismus in Deutschland, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 188198.Google Scholar
Hassel, A. (2005b) ‘Gewerkschaften’ in von Winter, T., Willems, U. (eds) Interessenverbände in Deutschland, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 172196.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. (1977) ‘Political parties and macroeconomic policy’, American Political Science Review, 71(4), pp. 14671487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirche, K. (1961) ‘Gewerkschafter im Deutschen Bundestag’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 12, pp. 641651.Google Scholar
Hirche, K. (1965) ‘Gewerkschafter im 5. Deutschen Bundestag’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 16, pp. 705712.Google Scholar
Hirche, K. (1969) ‘Gewerkschafter im 6. Deutschen Bundestag’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 20, pp. 716723.Google Scholar
Hirche, K. (1973) ‘Gewerkschafter im 7. Deutschen Bundestag’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 24, pp. 8390.Google Scholar
Hirsch, B. T. (2004) ‘What do unions do for economic performance?’, Journal of Labor Research, 25(3), pp. 415455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hönigsberger, H. (2008) Der parlamentarische Arm. Gewerkschafter im Bundestag zwischen politischer Logik und Interessenvertretung, Edition Sigma, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hyman, R., Gumbrell-McCormick, R. (2010) ‘Trade unions, politics and parties: Is a new configuration possible?’, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16(3), pp. 315331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lye, J., McDonald, I. M. (2006) ‘Union power and Australia’s inflation barrier, 1965:4 to 2003:3’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 9(3), pp. 287304.Google Scholar
McHugh, J. (2002) Wage Centralization, Union Bargaining, and Macroeconomic Performance, IMF Working Paper No. 02/143, IMF, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., Ochel, W. (2005) ‘Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s: What do we know?’, Economic Journal, 115(500), pp 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pedersen, P. J. (1978) ‘Union growth and the business cycle: A note on the Bain—Elsheikh model’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(3), pp. 373377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pege, W. (1996) ‘Wachstum amlinken Rand’, IW-Gewerkschaftsreport, 30, pp. 7279.Google Scholar
Pege, W. (1999) ‘Waiter Wachstum im linken Spektrum’, IW-Gewerkschaftsreport, 33, pp. 39.Google Scholar
Pege, W. (2002) ‘Jeder dritte Bundestagsabgeordnete in der Gewerkschaft’, Unternehmen und Gesellschaft: Magazin für Unternehmer und Führungskräfte, 4, p. 20.Google Scholar
Pege, W. (2003): ‘Gewerkschaften im Bundestag’, Unternehmen und Gesellschaft: Magazin für Unternehmer und Führungskräfte, 3, pp. 2829.Google Scholar
Pencavel, J. (2005) ‘Unionism viewed internationally’, Journal of Labor Research, 26, pp. 6597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, K. (1983) ‘Gewerkschafter im 10. Deutschen Bundestag’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 34, pp. 449453.Google Scholar
Richter, K. (1987) ‘Gewerkschafter im 11. Deutschen Bundestag’, Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, 38, pp. 182185.Google Scholar
Riley, N.-M. (1997) ‘Determinants of union membership: A review’, Labor, 11(2), pp. 265301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdell, C., Hartley, K. (2008) Microeconomic Policy: A New Perspective, Elgar, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ours, J. C. (1992) ‘Union growth in The Netherlands 1961–1989’, Applied Economics, 24(9), pp. 10591066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar