Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:32:56.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to Special Collection: Women’s agency at work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Janet Sayers ,
Jane Parker ,
Julie Douglas ,
Katherine Ravenswood  and
Rae Cooper
Janet Sayers*
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
Jane Parker
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
Julie Douglas
Affiliation:
AUT University, New Zealand
Katherine Ravenswood
Affiliation:
AUT University, New Zealand
Rae Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
*
Janet Sayers, School of Management, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. Email: J.G.Sayers@massey.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article introduces a Special Collection of four articles that highlight responses by working women collectively and individually to forces accelerated by the recent global crises. It draws out common themes from accounts of African women’s responses to harassment at work, of the links between union representation and pay equity in Brazil and South Africa and of Australian women’s quest for flexible and fair work/family arrangements. From these perspectives, the article sets out a five-point research agenda to help empower women’s collective and individual agency in response to working conditions shaped by global economic and social forces.

Keywords

J100Genderindustrial/employment relations policysocial movementsunion organisation
Type
Introduction
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 26 , Issue 3: Special Collection: Women’s Agency at Work , September 2015 , pp. 384 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, J (2006) Inequality regimes: gender, class and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20(4): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M (2013 [2009]) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J, Rooney, T, Whitehouse, G (2012) Tracking pay equity: the impact of regulatory change on the dissemination and sustainability of equal remuneration decisions. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(2): 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R, Baird, M (2009) Australian women: getting to equality? In: Catalyst Australia Staff (ed.) Equality Speaks: Challenges for a Fair Society. Sydney, NSW: Catalyst, pp. 57–67.Google Scholar
Cooper, R, Parker, J (2012) Women, work and collectivism. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(2): 107–113.Google Scholar
Donnelly, N, Proctor-Thomson, S (2012) The role of ‘voice’ in matters of ‘choice’: flexible work outcomes for women in the New Zealand Public Services. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(2): 182–203.Google Scholar
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (2015) Gender Equality Index 2015: measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012. Available at: http://eige.europa.eu/content/news-article/eige-launches-gender-equality-index-2015-marginal-improvements-in-gender-equali (accessed 20 June).Google Scholar
Gregory, A, Milner, S (2009) Trade unions and work–life balance: changing times in France and the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations 47(1): 122–146.Google Scholar
Healy, G, Hansen, LL, Ledwith, S (2006) Editorial: still uncovering gender in industrial relations. Industrial Relations Journal 37(4): 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2012) From Precarious Work to Decent Work: Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to Combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: ILO (Bureau for Workers’ Activities).Google Scholar
Kirton, G, Greene, AM (2011) Diversity management meets downsizing: the case of a government department. Employee Relations 33(5): 22–39.Google Scholar
New Zealand Human Rights Commission (2010) New Zealand Census of Women’s Participation – 2010. Wellington: HRC. Available at: http://www.neon.org.nz/documents/womensCensus/HRC-Womens-Census2010.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
New Zealand Human Rights Commission (2012) New Zealand Census of Women’s Participation – 2012. Wellington: HRC. Available at: http://www.hrc.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/web-census.pdf (accessed 20 June 2015).Google Scholar
Ravenswood, K, Markey, R (2011) The role of unions in achieving a family-friendly workplace. Journal of Industrial Relations 53(4): 486–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, J, Jones, D (2014a) Truth scribbled in blood: work, menstruation and poetry. Gender, Work and Organization 22(4): 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, J, Jones, D (2014b) Fifty shades of outrage: women’s collective online action, embodiment and emotions. Labour and Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 24(4): 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. USA: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar