Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-7qpfz Total loading time: 0.593 Render date: 2022-11-27T13:33:18.378Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide in UK 17-year olds: prevalence and sociodemographic inequalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2021

Praveetha Patalay*
Affiliation:
Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Social Research, UK; and MRC Unit of Lifelong Health and Ageing, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, UK
Emla Fitzsimons
Affiliation:
Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Social Research, UK
*
Correspondence: Praveetha Patalay. Email: p.patalay@ucl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a large (n = 10 103), nationally representative sample of 17-year-olds 16.1% had experienced high psychological distress in the past 30 days, 24.1% had self-harmed in the previous 12 months and 7.4% had ever attempted suicide. Females, White adolescents, sexual minorities and those from more socioeconomically disadvantaged families had worse mental health outcomes; with the exceptions of no detected differences in attempted suicide by ethnicity and in self-harm by socioeconomic position. Findings include a narrower gender gap in self-harm at age 17 (males 20.1%, females 28.2%) compared with at age 14 (males 8.5%; females 22.8%) and 2–4 times higher prevalence in sexual minority adolescents (39.3% high distress, 55.8% self-harmed, 21.7% attempted suicide compared with 13.4%, 20.5% and 5.8%, respectively, in heterosexual adolescents).

Type
Short report
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

There has been a growing policy focus on young people's mental health. Three-quarters of lifetime mental illness are first experienced in adolescence, making prevention efforts in the first two decades vital.1 There are also stark sociodemographic differences in adolescent mental health difficulties,2 with far-reaching consequences for widening inequalities and adverse social, economic and health outcomes throughout life.Reference Clayborne, Varin and Colman3 Prevalence estimates from the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) indicated that almost 16% of 14-year olds reported high levels of depressive symptoms, and 15.7% reported self-harming.Reference Patalay and Gage4 Estimates from the 2017 Mental Health of Children and Young People in England Study, the only other source of nationally generalisable prevalence rates, reported that 16.9% of 17- to 19-year-olds had a diagnosable mental disorder.2

In this paper, focusing on mental ill health at age 17 in the MCS, we present the prevalence of high psychological distress in the past 30 days, 12-month prevalence of self-harm and lifetime prevalence of attempted suicide. We delineate inequalities in these mental ill health outcomes by gender, ethnicity, sexuality and socioeconomic position.

Method

Participants

Participants are from the age 17 sweep of the MCS (2018–19), a UK birth cohort study of individuals born at the start of the millennium. At age 17, 10 625 families participated, of whom 10 345 completed the self-report survey, with 10 103 completing a mental health measure, these are our analysis sample (mean age: 17.18, s.d. = 0.34, 51.3% female, 80.9% White, 3% mixed race, 10.9% Asian, 3.6% Black and 1.6% other ethnicities; 26.7% in poverty). In total, 10.6% identified as non-heterosexual at age 17 (6.5% bisexual, 2.5% gay or lesbian and 1.6% other). (Details of the study design, variables and attrition can be found at5).

Ethics approval for the age 17 sweep were obtained from the National Research Ethics Service Research Ethics Committee (REC) North East – York (REC ref: 17/NE/0341). Participants provided informed consent before completing the assessments.

Measures

Psychological distress

Participants responded to the K6 measure of psychological distress.Reference Kessler, Green, Gruber, Sampson, Bromet and Cuitan6 It asks respondents how often in the past 30 days they felt, for example hopeless, with five response options ranging from none of the time to all of the time. Total scores range from 0 to 24, higher scores indicating greater distress. The scale has moderate and severe thresholds, and we use the severe threshold (≥13) considered indicative of serious mental illness,Reference Kessler, Green, Gruber, Sampson, Bromet and Cuitan6,Reference Prochaska, Sung, Max, Shi and Ong7 hereafter referred to as ‘high psychological distress’.

Self-harm

Self-harm was reported in response (yes or no) to the question ‘During the last year, have you hurt yourself on purpose in any of the following ways?: cut or stabbed, burned, bruised or pinched, overdose, pulled out hair, other.’

Attempted suicide

Attempted suicide was reported in response to ‘Have you ever hurt yourself on purpose in an attempt to end your life?’ and coded yes or no.

Inequality indicators

Gender was recorded at birth. Ethnicity was parent-reported in childhood. Sexual identity was self-reported at age 17. Socioeconomic position was based on household income at age 14 that was Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development equivalised and categorised into quintiles; poverty status is based on having below 60% of median income.

Analysis

Prevalences have been weighted to account for both the complex survey design and non-response to follow-up, to generate nationally representative estimates. Details of loss-to-follow-up, data access, analysis software and code are presented in the Supplementary material available at https://doi.org10.1192/bjp.2020.258.

Results

The overall prevalence of high psychological distress was 16.1% (95% CI 14.7–17.7), 12-month prevalence of self-harm was 24.1% (95% CI 22.6–25.7) and lifetime prevalence of attempted suicides was 7.4% (95% CI 6.6–8.3%).

Figure 1 includes prevalences of high psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide by gender, ethnicity, sexuality and socioeconomic status (Supplementary Fig. 1 shows distributions of psychological distress by these factors).

Fig. 1 National prevalence estimates of high psychological distress (K-6 score ≥13), 12-month prevalence of self-harm and lifetime prevalence of self-harm with suicidal intent (attempted suicide) by (a) gender, (b) ethnicity, (c) sexuality and (d) income at age 17 years in the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Females reported higher average psychological distress, with 22% experiencing high psychological distress compared with 10% of males. Females also reported higher levels of self-harm (28%) and attempted suicide (10.6%) than males (20% and 4.3%, respectively). Supplementary Fig. 2 shows types of self-harming behaviour by gender.

High psychological distress and self-harm were most prevalent in White respondents (Fig. 1). Attempted suicide rates were similar across most ethnic groups, with the lowest prevalence reported by Asian adolescents.

Large disparities were observed by sexuality with over half of sexual minorities having reported self-harming (55.8%) and about one-fifth (21.7%) attempted suicide (compared with 20.5% and 5.8%, respectively, in heterosexual adolescents).

Prevalences of high psychological distress and suicide attempts demonstrated a socioeconomic pattern, with some evidence of an income gradient, especially in attempted suicide where rates in the two poorest income quintiles are twice (around 12%) that for adolescents from higher-income families (around 6%). Self-harming behaviour is not patterned by family income, being similar across income quintiles.

Discussion

This paper highlights: (a) high prevalences of psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide among 17-year olds, and (b) gender-, ethnic-, socioeconomic- and sexuality-based inequalities in who experiences these difficulties at this age.

High prevalences have also been recently reported elsewhere with 15.4% of 17- to 19-year-olds having reported ever self-harming or attempted suicide.2 In contrast, lifetime self-harm prevalence in the UK adults was 6%Reference McManus, Gunnell, Cooper, Bebbington, Howard and Brugha8 and high psychological distress based on the K-6 in US adults was, for instance, 8.6%.Reference Prochaska, Sung, Max, Shi and Ong7

Our findings reflect well-established higher prevalences in females. However, the male–female gap in self-harm at age 17 (males 20.1%, females 28.2%) was considerably narrower than at earlier ages (males 8.5%, females 22.8%),Reference Patalay and Gage4 highlighting the greater increase in self-harming in males between ages 14 and 17.

Ethnic differences were similar to those reported elsewhere for this generation whereby White adolescents report the highest levels of distress.2 An exception is attempted suicide, which demonstrated few ethnic differences. The reasons for observed ethnic differences in distress and self-harm and the lack of ethnic differences in attempted suicide might include inequalities in support and access to services in ethnic minority groups.Reference Edbrooke-Childs and Patalay9

Sexual minority adolescents report the highest prevalences, with around 2–4 times the rates of self-harm and attempted suicide compared with their heterosexual peers. These findings highlight the need to better support this group and for parents, educators and clinicians to be aware that sexual minority adolescents might be struggling and need appropriate support, as they often also experience greater bullying, assault and a host of adverse co-occurring mental health related outcomes.Reference Amos, Manalastas, White, Bos and Patalay10

The distribution of psychological distress scores (Supplementary Fig. 1) highlighted that although the mean scores in the socioeconomically disadvantaged group are higher, they are also more dispersed, with more disadvantaged adolescents reporting both higher and lower distress. Of note, prevalence of attempted suicide was almost double (around 12%) in the poorest two quintiles compared with the other income groups.

Like all longitudinal cohorts, MCS suffers from non-random attrition, and although this is accounted for by weights in analyses it is possible that the loss-to-follow-up of more disadvantaged participants might result in underestimation of prevalences. At age 14, the symptom measure included was different, precluding making any direct comparisons in distress prevalences between ages 14 and 17.

Age 17 marks an important age before many key life transitions, including the ending of compulsory education and moving away from home. With the ending of support from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) around this critical age, many young people fall through the gaps between CAMHS and adult mental health services, potentially further worsening outcomes at the precise time when support is most required.Reference Singh, Paul, Ford, Kramer, Weaver and McLaren11 These findings underline the urgent mental health support need in this generation. On the cusp of adulthood, they warn of a further widening in health, economic and social inequalities.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.258

Data availability

The Millennium Cohort Study data are available to all researchers, free of cost from the UK Data Service (https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the cooperation of the Millennium Cohort Study families who voluntarily participate in the study. We thank the Economic and Social Research Council and the co-funding by a consortium of UK government departments for funding the MCS through the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) at the UCL Institute of Social Research. We would also like to thank a large number of stakeholders from academic, policymaker and funder communities and colleagues at CLS involved in data collection and management. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of this report.

Author contributions

P.P. and E.F. conceptualised the study and interpreted the data. P.P. conducted the analysis and drafted the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version and consented to its publication.

Funding

The Millennium Cohort Study is primarily funded by the Economic and Social Research Council with co-funding from a consortium of government departments.

Declaration of interest

None.

References

Royal College of Psychiatrists. No Health Without Public Mental Health. The Case for Action. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010.Google Scholar
NHS Digital. Mental Health of Children and Young People in England, 2017: Summary of Key Findings. Government Statistical Service, 2018.Google Scholar
Clayborne, ZM, Varin, M, Colman, I. Systematic review and meta-analysis: adolescent depression and long-term psychosocial outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 58: 72–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patalay, P, Gage, SH. Changes in millennial adolescent mental health and health-related behaviours over 10 years: a population cohort comparison study. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48: 1650–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centre for Longitudinal Studies. Millennium Cohort Study. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, no date (https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/cls-studies/millennium-cohort-study/)Google Scholar
Kessler, RC, Green, JG, Gruber, MJ, Sampson, NA, Bromet, E, Cuitan, M, et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010; 19: 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prochaska, JJ, Sung, HY, Max, W, Shi, Y, Ong, M. Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2012; 21: 8897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, S, Gunnell, D, Cooper, C, Bebbington, PE, Howard, LM, Brugha, T, et al. Prevalence of non-suicidal self-harm and service contact in England, 2000–14: repeated cross-sectional surveys of the general population. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6: 573–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edbrooke-Childs, J, Patalay, P. Ethnic differences in referral routes to youth mental health services. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 58: 36875.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amos, R, Manalastas, EJ, White, R, Bos, H, Patalay, P. Mental health, social adversity, and health-related outcomes in sexual minority adolescents: a contemporary national cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020; 4(1): 3645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, SP, Paul, M, Ford, T, Kramer, T, Weaver, T, McLaren, S, et al. Process, outcome and experience of transition from child to adult mental healthcare: multiperspective study. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 197: 305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 National prevalence estimates of high psychological distress (K-6 score ≥13), 12-month prevalence of self-harm and lifetime prevalence of self-harm with suicidal intent (attempted suicide) by (a) gender, (b) ethnicity, (c) sexuality and (d) income at age 17 years in the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Supplementary material: PDF

Patalay and Fitzsimons supplementary material

Patalay and Fitzsimons supplementary material

Download Patalay and Fitzsimons supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 580 KB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide in UK 17-year olds: prevalence and sociodemographic inequalities
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide in UK 17-year olds: prevalence and sociodemographic inequalities
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Psychological distress, self-harm and attempted suicide in UK 17-year olds: prevalence and sociodemographic inequalities
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *