Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:14:21.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrew T. A. Cheng*
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Brian Cooper
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Professor Andrew Cheng, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan. Fax: +88 62 27853569; e-mail: bmandrew@ccvax.sinica.edu.tw
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2001 

The title of this supplement is that chosen for the Eighth Congress of the International Federation of Psychiatric Epidemiology, held in Taipei, Taiwan, on 6-9 March 1999 and co-sponsored by the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, and the Taiwanese Society of Psychiatry. In addition to the Federation's main aim of encouraging population-based research in different world regions, and especially in developing countries, the Taipei Congress was intended to improve communication between disciplines that in general still pursue such research quite independently of one another. The papers included here represent a small part of the scientific programme, selected for their special relevance to the central topic of the meeting.

The term genome, though comparatively recent, is now widely understood to refer to the total genetic complements of living organisms, and genomics to mean the study of their structure and functions. Envirome (or environome) has been proposed as a corresponding term for the totality of environmental conditions and processes that impinge upon human health and influence the risks for mortality and morbidity, and enviromics by analogy to denote the study of such influences. Psychiatric enviromics refers more specifically to studies of environmental conditions and processes that either promote mental health or increase the risk of mental disorder, whether early developmental influences comprising ‘nurture’ or subsequent exposures throughout the life span. Gene—environment correlation and interaction thus constitute aspects of the interplay of nature and nurture although, as several contributors emphasise, genetic and environmental factors do not act on one another directly (induced mutation apart), but in each case exercise their effects upon the individual phenotype at cellular, organic or individual level.

The special fascination of this research nexus stems from its position at the cross-roads of psychiatry, medical and behavioural genetics, environmental science and medical sociology. Medical genetics, being concerned with genetic anomalies as causes of human disease, has traditionally concentrated on single-gene Mendelian disorders whose transmission could be mapped and were little affected by surrounding conditions. Today, however, genetic epidemiology deals increasingly with complex polygenetic disorders, in which inherited tendency and pathogenic exposures are jointly implicated. Among these must be numbered, on the evidence reviewed here, psychiatric illness categories such as schizophrenia, major affective disorder, alcohol dependence and late-life dementia.

In behavioural genetics, which explores the significance of inherited variation for manifold features of human behaviour, the notion of qualitative abnormality recedes into the background or even disappears. The discipline is none the less relevant in psychiatric research, whose range of inquiry extends from disease aetiology to the quantitative genetics of cognitive function and personality traits such as neuroticism and extraversion. Environmental medicine is concerned with natural and artificial hazards to human health, whether traumatic, toxic or biological in nature, and medical sociology with causal or predictive factors such as low social status, social deprivation, family dysfunction and stressful life events. Individual studies have confirmed the importance of all these various types of risk.

Gene—environment research in this field is, however, still in its infancy, and will take time to produce substantive findings. Three main areas of difficulty can be delineated. To begin with, although researchers have nominated many candidate genes for the major psychoses, few findings have been replicated and none as yet definitely confirmed. In each case lack of knowledge about the pathogenetic basis of these conditions renders the endeavour akin to searching for needles in the proverbial haystack. Moreover, some disorders may be related to anomalies of gene expression, which occur at distinct stages of development and are not detectable by cross-sectional studies. Second, research into the socio-environmental risk factors of mental illness has suffered increasing neglect since the 1980s and is in urgent need of revival. There is no overall frame of reference for assembling and classifying the great variety of hazards, known or putative, in different populations and cultures. Indeed, in many instances it is unclear whether the subject of investigation has any direct causal link with psychiatric risk, or simply serves as a convenient marker for some as yet unidentified hazard. Third, progress in this field will require the testing of specified forms of interaction occurring at different stages of the life cycle. Thus genetic inheritance combined with early developmental (including prenatal and perinatal) exposures may result in a latent sensitivity or vulnerability, so that later encounters with relatively mild or even ubiquitous forms of environmental stress can then provoke the clinical symptoms of illness.

While much more research will be necessary before the results of gene-environment studies can find practical application in treatment or prevention, encouragement is to be found in the beginnings of inter-disciplinary dialogue and co-operation, for which the contributions included here provide some evidence. Being based on conference presentations, these papers do not conform to any predefined schema, but are widely disparate in content and style. To ensure a degree of cohesion, and to emphasise the underlying thread of argument, they have been grouped into four sections. First, Steven Rose (Reference Rose2001, this supplement), James Anthony (Reference Anthony2001, this supplement) and Jenae Neiderhiser (Reference Neiderhiser2001, this supplement) discuss from different standpoints the underlying conceptual and methodological issues. Next is a group of papers in which epidemiological research on genetics, neurobiology and environmental exposures is reviewed with respect to schizophrenia (Reference Tsuang, Stone and FaraoneMing Tsuang et al, 2001, this supplement; Reference Kunugi, Nanko and MurrayHiroshi Kunugi et al, 2001, this supplement; Reference Munk-J⊘rgensen and EwaldPovl Munk-Jørgensen & Henrik Ewald, 2001, this supplement), alcohol dependence (Reference Heath, Whitfield and MaddenAndrew Heath et al, 2001, this supplement) and cognitive development (Reference Plomin and CraigRobert Plomin & Ian Craig, 2001, this supplement; Reference Lai, Guo and GuoTe-Jen Lai et al, 2001, this supplement). In a third cluster of studies, predisposing or provoking social factors such as family adversity, low social status and stressful life events are introduced into the causal models for early-onset Alzheimer's disease (Reference WhalleyLawrence Whalley, 2001, this supplement), functional psychosis in an immigrant population (Reference Sharpley, Hutchinson and McKenzieMandy Sharpley et al, 2001, this supplement) and the non-psychotic mental disorders common in survey populations (Reference GoldbergDavid Goldberg, 2001, this supplement; Reference Van Os, Park and JonesJim van Os et al, 2001, this supplement; Reference Fan and EatonAngela Fan & William Eaton, 2001, this supplement; Reference Ritsher, Warner and JohnsonJennifer Ritsher et al, 2001, this supplement). Finally, an attempt is made to review progress and assess future prospects for interdisciplinary research in this field (Reference CooperBrian Cooper, 2001, this supplement).

The Taipei Congress succeeded in its objective of bringing together clinicians and scientists from many countries who believe that this is the right direction for future advance, and we hope that this volume will help to reinforce the trend.

References

Anthony, J. C. (2001) The promise of psychiatric enviromics. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s8s11.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. (2001) Nature, nurture and mental disorder: old concepts in the new millennium. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s91s101.Google Scholar
Fan, A. P. & Eaton, W. W. (2001) Longitudinal study assessing the joint effects of socio-economic status and birth risks on adult emotional and nervous conditions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s78s83.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (2001) Vulnerability factors for common mental illnesses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s69s71.Google Scholar
Heath, A. C., Whitfield, J. B., Madden, P. A. F., et al (2001) Towards a molecular epidemiology of alcohol dependence: analysing the interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s33s40.Google Scholar
Kunugi, H., Nanko, S. & Murray, R. M. (2001) Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: prenatal underdevelopment and subsequent neurodevelopmental impairment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s25s29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, T. J., Guo, Y. L., Guo, N. W., et al (2001) Effect of prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls on cognitive development in children: a longitudinal study in Taiwan. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s49s52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk-J⊘rgensen, P. & Ewald, H. (2001) Epidemiology in neurobiological research: exemplified by the influenza–schizophrenia theory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s30s32.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M. (2001) Understanding the roles of genome and envirome: methods in genetic epidemiology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s12s17 Google Scholar
Plomin, R. & Craig, I. (2001) Genetics, environment and cognitive abilities: review and work in progress towards a genome scan for quantitative trait locus associations using DNA pooling. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s41s48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritsher, J. E. B., Warner, V., Johnson, J. G., et al (2001) Inter-generational longitudinal study of social class and depression: a test of social causation and social selection models. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s84s90.Google Scholar
Rose, S. (2001) Moving on from old dichotomies: beyond nature-nurture towards a lifeline perspective. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s3s7.Google Scholar
Sharpley, M. S., Hutchinson, G., McKenzie, K., et al (2001) Understanding the excess of psychosis among the African–Caribbean population in England. Review of current hypotheses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s60s68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuang, M. T., Stone, W. S. & Faraone, S. V. (2001) Genes, environment and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s18s24.Google Scholar
Van Os, J., Park, S. B. G. & Jones, P. B. (2001) Neuroticism, life events and mental health: evidence for person–environment correlation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s72s77.Google Scholar
Whalley, L. J. (2001) Early-onset Alzheimer's disease in Scotland: environmental and familial factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (suppl. 40), s53s59.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.