Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:19:26.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Huntington's Chorea: Some Psychodynamics seen in those at Risk and in the Responses of the Helping Professions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

B. Martindale
B. Martindale*
Affiliation:
St Charles Hospital, Exmoor Street, London W10
*
∗Paddington Centre for Psychotherapy, 63/65 Lancaster Road, London W11 1QG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The autosomal dominant mode of inheritance of Huntington's Chorea (HC) has been established for over 100 years. Strong psychological defences against the acceptance of this knowledge are commonly found both in professionals and in Huntington families and relatives who are at risk. One consequence of maintaining these defences is the continuing transmission of the gene, and therefore the disease, to succeeding generations. The defences of professional persons protect them from the difficult and unsettling task of providing genetic counselling to healthy relatives at risk. An increase in awareness of the psychodynamics involved may lead to constructive thinking about the current deficiencies in care and counselling services provided for these families.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 150 , Issue 3 , March 1987 , pp. 319 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Button, R. (1981) Re-enactment as an unwitting professional response to family dynamics. In Psychotherapy with Families, An Analytic Approach (eds S. Box, B. Copley, J. MacAgna & E. Moustari). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carter, T. N., Evans, K. A. & Barajtser, M. (1983) Effects of genetic counselling on the prevalence of Huntington's Chorea. British Medical Journal, 286, 281–283.Google Scholar
Chase, T. M., Wexler, N. S. & Barbeau, A. (eds) (1979) Advances in Neurology, Vol. 23. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Gardham, F. (1982) On Nursing Huntington's Chorea. London: Association to Combat Huntington's Chorea.Google Scholar
Harper, P. S. (1983) A genetic marker for Huntington's Chorea. British Medical Journal, 287, 1567–1568.Google Scholar
Harper, P. S., Smith, S., Tyler, A. & Jones, P. (1981) Decline in the predicted incidence of Huntington's Chorea associated with systematic genetic counselling and family support. Lancet, U, 411–413.Google Scholar
Hayden, N. R. (1981) Huntington's Chorea, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Heathfield, K. W. G. (1973) Huntington's Chorea: A Centenary Review. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 49, 32–45.Google Scholar
Huntington, G. (1872) On Chorea: Medical and Surgical Reporter, Philadelphia, 26, 317.Google Scholar
Martindale, B. V. & Bottomley, V. (1980) The management of families with Huntington's Chorea: A case study to illustrate some recommendations. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21, 343–351.Google Scholar
Martindale, B. V. & Yale, R. (1983) Huntington's Chorea. Neglected opportunities for preventive medicine. Lancet, i, 634–636.Google Scholar
Office of Health Economics (1980) Huntington's Chorea, Pamphlet No. 67. Luton UK: White Crescent Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. H. (1982) Living with Huntington's Disease, London: Junction Books.Google Scholar
Stern, R. & Eloridge, R. (1975) Attitudes of patients and their relatives to Huntington's disease. Journal of Medical Genetics, 12, 217–223.Google Scholar
Wexler, N. S. (1979) Genetic “Russian roulette”: The experience of being “at risk” for Huntington's disease. In Genetic Counselling: Psychological Dimensions (ed. S. Kessler) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whittier, J. R., Heimler, A. & Korenyi, C. (1972) The psychiatrist and Huntington's Chorea. American Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 96–100.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.