Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:12:49.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Contingent Negative Variation in Antisocial Behaviour: a Pilot Study of Broadmoor Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

G. W. Fenton
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland; Institute of Psychiatry, University of London and Maudsley Hospital, London
P. B. C. Fenwick
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London and St Thomas' and Westminster Hospitals, London
W. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berks
C. T. Lam
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London

Abstract

Using a classical click/flash paradigm, the CNV was recorded from the following three groups of subjects at Broadmoor Hospital: (1) 14 ‘psychopathic’ patients selected by use of the 4/9 MMPI profile and confirmed by independent clinical diagnosis; (2) 15 ‘non psychopathic’ patients, all psychotic and mainly schizophrenic; (3) 14 healthy staff control subjects. All three groups were matched for age and sex; the two patients groups were also matched for length of stay. Two series of 32 paired stimuli were used, separated by an interval of 30 minutes. The mean CNV voltage was significantly lower in the ‘non-psychopathic’ patients. The amplitude of the ‘psychopath's' CNV response did not differ significantly from that of the staff controls, but the response variability between the first and second series of trials was much greater in the ‘psychopathic’ patients than in the other two subject groups. The ‘psychopathic’ subjects tended to show more rapid initial development of the CNV.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackburn, R. (1970) Personality Types Among Abnormal Homicides. Special Hospitals Research Reports, Number 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, R. (1974) Personality and the Classification of Psychopathic Disorders. Special Hospitals Research Reports, Number 10.Google Scholar
Cleckley, H. (1955) The Mask of Sanity. St Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1970) Psychopathy: Theory and Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCallum, W. C. (1967) The contingent negative variation as a cortical sign of attention in man. In Attention in Neurophysiology (eds Evans, C. R. and Mulholland, T. B.), pp 4063. London: Butter-worth.Google Scholar
McCallum, W. C. (1973) The CNV and conditionability in psychopaths. In Event-related Slow Potentials of the Brain: Their Relations to Behaviour (eds McCallum, W. C. and Knott, J. R.). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 33, pp 337–43.Google Scholar
McCallum, W. C. & Abraham, P. (1973) The contingent negative variation in psychosis. Ibid., pp 329–35.Google Scholar
Syndulko, K., Parker, D. A., Jens, R., Malitzman, I. & Ziskind, E. (1975) Psychophysiology of sociopathy: electrocortical measures. Biological Psychology, 3, 185200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teece, J. J. (1972) Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennent, G., Loucas, K., Fenton, G. W. & Fenwick, P. (1974) Male admissions to Broadmoor Hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 4450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, W. G. (1964) Slow potential waves in the human brain associated with expectancy, attention and decision. Archiv für Psychiatric und Nervenkrankheiten, 206, 309–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, W. G. (1966) Electrophysiologic contributions to psychiatric therapy. In Current Psychiatric Therapies, vol. VI (ed. Masserman, J. H.), pp 1325. New York: Grune and Stratton Google Scholar
Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C. & Winter, A. L. (1964) Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature (Lond.), 203, 380–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.