Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:02:40.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concordance Between Assessment at Interview of Objective and Subjective Disability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Richard Crocket  and
Christine Hassall
Richard Crocket
Affiliation:
Ingrebourne Centre, St. George's Hospital, Hornchurch, Essex
Christine Hassall
Affiliation:
Ingrebourne Centre, St. George's Hospital, Hornchurch, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How useful to the psychiatrist are subjective complaints by a patient?

The question of objective appraisal was reviewed by Harris (1938, 1954) in connection with follow-up studies, initially of in-patients, and latterly of day-patients, at the Maudsley Hospital.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 110 , Issue 467 , July 1964 , pp. 571 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harris, A. (1938). “Prognosis of anxiety states.” Brit. med. J., ii, 649.Google Scholar
Harris, A. (1954). “A comparative study of results in neurotic patients treated by two different methods.” J. ment. Sci., 100, 718.Google Scholar
Harris, A. (1955). “The estimate of neurosis.” Lancet, i, 376.Google Scholar
Malan, D. H. (1961). “On the ‘clinical’ and ‘objective’ approaches to psychodynamic material.” Brit. J. med. Psychol., 34, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.