Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:24:51.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Summary Remarks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Jeremiah P. Ostriker
Jeremiah P. Ostriker*
Affiliation:
Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, New Jersey 08544 USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Of the classical problems of physics there is one which might be picked out as simplest to state but slowest to approach solution. “What is the fate of a self-gravitating system of point masses interacting according to Newton's laws?” The frustration felt by theoreticians, who, despite the accumulation of more than 300 years of mathematical knowledge and numerical technology, have not solved the problem, even to understanding the qualitative late evolution of such systems, is compounded by the existence of observations known since Messier's time of over 100 globular star clusters. These are real and ancient systems, well approximating the idealized problem; astronomical study of their properties should have led us to an understanding of the physical situation. Galactic clusters containing smaller numbers of stars also exist in abundance. However, most of these are much younger systems and they are also subject to a variety of additional complex processes, not important in the large N, globular cluster, systems. Because of this complexity they are less well understood than globulars and will not be covered in this theoretically oriented review.

Type
June 1: The Dynamics of Star Clusters: Future Prospects
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 113: Dynamic of Stars Clusters , 1985 , pp. 511 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985 

References

Ambartsumian, V. A. 1938, Ann. Len. State Univ., #22, Issue 4, p. 19.Google Scholar
Angeletti, L. and Giannone, P. 1977, Astron. & Astroph., 58, 363.Google Scholar
Angeletti, L. and Giannone, P. 1980, Astron. & Astroph.Google Scholar
Antonov, Y. A. 1962, Bull. Univ. Leningrad, 7, 135.Google Scholar
Applegate, J. 1984, preprint.Google Scholar
Bahcall, J. N., and Ostriker, J. P. 1975, Nature, 256, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, H. 1979, Ap. J., 234, 1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, H. 1980, Ap. J., 242, 765.Google Scholar
Colgate, S. A. 1967, Ap. J., 150, 163.Google Scholar
Dokuchaev, V. I. and Ozernoy, L. M. 1982, Astron. Astrophys., 11, 16.Google Scholar
Duncan, M. J. and Shapiro, S. L. 1982, Ap. J., 253, 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, A. C., Pringle, J. E. and Rees, M. 1975, M.N.R.A.S., 172 15P.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. 1984, Ap. J., 280, 298.Google Scholar
Hachisu, I., Nakada, Y., Nomoto, K. and Sugimoto, D. 1978, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Japan), 60, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, O. and Seidentopf, H. 1930, Zs. f. Ap., 1, 67.Google Scholar
Heggie, D. C. 1975, M.N.R.A.S., 173, 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, D. C. 1979, M.N.R.A.S., 188, 525.Google Scholar
Heggie, D. C. 1984, M.N.R.A.S., 206, 179.Google Scholar
Henon, M. 1961, Ann. d. Ap., 24, 369.Google Scholar
Henon, M. 1965, Ann. d. Ap., 28, 62.Google Scholar
Henon, M. 1975, IAU Symposium #69, Dynamics of Stellar Systems, ed. Hayli, A. (Dordrecht: Reidel) p. 133.Google Scholar
Inagaki, S. and Lynden-Bell, C. 1983, M.N.R.A.S., 205, 913.Google Scholar
Lightman, A. P. 1982, Ap. J. (Lett.), 263, L19.Google Scholar
Lightman, A. P., Press, W. H. and Odenwald, S. F. 1978, Ap. J., 219, 629.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. 1967, M.N.R.A.S., 136, 101.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. and Wood, R. 1968, M.N.R.A.S., 138, 495.Google Scholar
Marchant, A. B. and Shapiro, S. L. 1980, Ap. J., 239, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. and Eggleton, P. 1980, M.N.R.A.S., 191, 483.Google Scholar
McMillan, S. L. W. 1983, Ph.D. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P., Spitzer, L. and Chevalier, R. A. 1975, Ap. J. (Lett.), 176, L51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozernoy, L. M. and Dokuchaev, V. I. 1982, Astron. Astrophys., 111, 1.Google Scholar
Press, W. H. and Teukolsky, S. A. 1977, Ap. J., 213, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. L. 1977, Ap. J., 217, 281.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1940, M.N.R.A.S., 100, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1975, IAU Symposium #69, Dynamics of Stellar Systems, ed. Hayli, A. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 3.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. and Mathieu, R. D. 1980, Ap. J., 241, 618.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. and Saslaw, W. 1966, Ap. J., 143, 400.Google Scholar
Stodolkiewicz, J. S. 1982, Acta Astronomica, 32, 63.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. A. and Podurets, M. A. 1965, Astron. Zh., 42, 963 (English translation in Sov. Ast. A.J., 9, 742).Google Scholar