Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T00:44:51.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Models for Variability in AGNs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Martin J. Rees*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy Madingley Road Cambridge, CB3 0HA, U.K.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this talk I shall address three different processes relevant to continuum variability in AGNs. The first two refer to the physical conditions in the regions responsible for the non-thermal emission, and the implications of high brightness temperatures. The third is the distinctive type of flare that results when a star is tidally disrupted by a massive black hole; this process, which merits much further study, it likely to be specially important as a diagnostic of physical conditions in low-luminosity nearby nuclei.

Type
AGN Physics and Models
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Begelman, M.C., Sikora, M. and Rees, M.J. 1993 MNRAS submitted Google Scholar
Benford, G. 1992, Astrophys. J. (Lett.), 391, L59 Blandford, R.D. 1993 in preparation.Google Scholar
Canizzo, J.K., Lee, H.M. and Goodman, J 1990 Astrophys. J. 351, 38 Google Scholar
Coppi, P., Blandford, R.D. and Rees, M.J. 1993 MNRAS 262, 603.Google Scholar
Evans, C.R. and Kochanek, C.S. 1989 Astrophys. J. (Lett) 346, L13.Google Scholar
Prank, J. 1978, MNRAS 184, 87 Google Scholar
Gurzadyan, V.G. and Ozernoi, L.M. 1980 Astron. Astrophys. 86, 315.Google Scholar
Haehnelt, M. 1993, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Karas, V., and Vokrouhlicky, D., 1993a MNRAS in press Google Scholar
Karas, V., and Vokrouhlicky, D., 1993b Astrophys. J in press Google Scholar
Khokhlov, A., Novikov, I.D. and Pethick, C.J. 1993 MNRAS in press Google Scholar
King, A.R. and Done, C. 1993 MNRAS 264, 388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, C.S., 1993 Astrophys. J. in press Google Scholar
Kormendy, J. 1993 in “Testing the AGN Paradigm” ed Holt, S (AIP Conference Proceedings) Google Scholar
Laguna, P., Miller, W.A., Zurek, W.H., and Davies, M.B. 1993 in “Testing the AGN Paradigm” ed Holt, S. (AIP Conference Proceedings) Google Scholar
Lee, H.M. and Monaghan, J.J. 1993 in “Nuclei of Nearby Galaxies” ed Genzel, R and Harris, J. (Kluwer, in press).Google Scholar
Levich, E.V. 1972 Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 59.Google Scholar
Li, Z-Y, Begelman, M.C. and Chiueh, T., 1992. Astrophys. J. 384, 567.Google Scholar
Phinney, E.S. 1985 in “Astrophysics of Active Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects” ed Miller, J. p453 (University Science Books, California)Google Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P. and Rees, M.J. 1993 in preparation.Google Scholar
Quirrenbach, A. et al. 1989 Astr. Astrophys. 226, L1 Google Scholar
Qian, S.J. et al. 1991 Astr. Astrophys. 241, 15 Google Scholar
Rees, M.J. 1984 in “Very Long Baseline Interferometry” eds Fanti, R. et al. p.207 (Reidel, Holland).Google Scholar
Rees, M.J. 1988 Nature 333, 523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunyaev, R.A. 1970 Astrophys. Lett 7, 19.Google Scholar
Syer, D and Clarke, C.J. 1992 MNRAS 255, 92 (errata in 260, 463) Google Scholar
Syer, D., Clarke, C.J. and Rees, M.J. 1991 MNRAS 250, 505.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.B. 1982 MNRAS 200, 881 Google Scholar
Witzel, A. 1992 in “Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei”, eds Wagner, S., and Duschl, W. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin)Google Scholar