Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T06:24:03.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luminosity Density Evolution in the Universe and Cosmological Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Tomonori Totani*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Tokyo 113, Japan totani@utaphp2.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Star formation history in galaxies is strongly correlated to their present-day colors and the Hubble sequence can be considered as a sequence of different star formation history. Therefore we can model the cosmic star formation history based on the colors of local galaxies, and comparison to direct observations of luminosity density evolution at high redshift gives a new test for the cosmological parameters which is insensitive to merger history of galaxies. The luminosity density evolution in 0 < z < 1 observed by the Canada-France Redshift Survey in three wavebands of 2800Å, 4400Å, and 1μm indicates that the Λ-dominated flat universe with λ0 ∼ 0.8 (> 0.53 at 95%CL) is strongly favored.

The cosmic star formation rate (SFR) at z > 2 is also compared to the latest data of the Hubble Deep Field including new data which were not incorporated in the previous work of Totani, Yoshii, & Sato (1997), and our model of the luminosity density of spiral galaxies taking account of gas infall is consistent with the observations. Starbursts in elliptical galaxies, which are expected from the galactic wind model, however overproduce SFRs and hence they should be formed at z ≳ 5 or their UV emission has to be hidden by dust extinction. The amount of metals in galactic winds and escaping ionizing photons are enough to contaminate the Lyα forests or to reionize the universe.

Type
III. Galaxy Formation and Evolution
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999 

References

Arimoto, N. & Yoshii, Y. 1987, A&A, 173, 23 (AY) Google Scholar
Arimoto, N., Yoshii, Y., & Takahara, F. 1992, A&A, 253, 21 (AYT) Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Fèvre, O. Le, Hammer, F., & Crampton, D. 1996, ApJ, 460, L1 Google Scholar
Connolly, A. J. et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, L11 Google Scholar
Madau, P. & Shull, J. M. 1996, ApJ, 457, 551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madau, P. 1997, in Star Formation Near and Far, eds. Holt, S. S. & Mundy, G. L. (AIP: New York), p481 Google Scholar
Maoz, D. 1997, preprint, astro-ph/9704173 (to appear in ApJL) Google Scholar
Meurer, G. R. et al. 1997, AJ, 114, 54 Google Scholar
Rowan-Robinson, M. et al. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totani, T., Sato, K. & Yoshii, Y. 1996, ApJ, 460, 303 Google Scholar
Totani, T., Yoshii, Y. & Sato, K. 1997, ApJ, 483, L75 (TYS) Google Scholar
Totani, T. 1997, ApJ, 486, L71 Google Scholar