Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T04:09:02.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Future of Radio Astronomy: Options for Dealing with Human Generated Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

R. D. Ekers  and
J. F. Bell
R. D. Ekers
Affiliation:
ATNF CSIRO, PO Box 76 Epping NSW 1710, Sydney Australia; rekers@atnf.csiro.au
J. F. Bell
Affiliation:
ATNF CSIRO, PO Box 76 Epping NSW 1710, Sydney Australia; jbell@atnf.csiro.au

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radio astronomy provides a unique window on the universe, allowing us to study non-thermal processes (e.g. galactic nuclei, quasars, pulsars) at the highest angular resolution using VLBI, with low opacity. It is the most interesting waveband for SETI searches. To date it has yielded three Nobel prizes (microwave background, pulsars, gravitational radiation). There are both exciting possibilities and substantial challenges for radio astronomy to remain at the cutting edge over the next three decades. New instruments like ALMA and the SKA will open up new science if the challenge of dealing with human generated interference can be met. We summarise some of the issues and technological developments that will be essential to the future success of radio astronomy.

Type
Part 4. Threats to Radio Astronomy
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 196: Preserving the Astronomical Sky , 2001 , pp. 199 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Barnbaum, C. & Bradley, R. 1998, AJ, 116, 2598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. F., et al. 1999 “Software radio telescope: interference mitigation atlas and mitigation strategies”, in Perspectives in Radio Astronomy: Scientific Imperatives at cm and m Wavelengths , Eds. van Haarlem, M.P. & van der Hulst, J.M. (Dwingeloo, NFRA).Google Scholar
Haykin, S. 1995, “Adaptive Filter Theory” Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sault, B., Ekers, R., Kewley, L. 1997 “Cross-correlation approaches to interference mitigation” Sydney SKA workshop, proceedings on www: http://www.atnf.csiro.au/SKA/WS/.Google Scholar
Smolders, A. B., 1999, “Phased-array system for the next generation of radio telescopes”, in Perspectives in Radio Astronomy: Scientific Imperatives at cm and m Wavelengths , Eds. van Haarlem, M.P. & van der Hulst, J.M. (Dwingeloo, NFRA).Google Scholar
Staveley-Smith, L. et al. 1996, PASA, 13, 243 “The Parkes 21cm Multibeam Receiver” (An overview of the science and overall system design of the multibeam receiver).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widrow, B. & Stearns, S., 1985, “Adaptive Signal Processing” Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Interference Mitigation Web pages http://www.atnf.csiro.au/SKA/intmit/.Google Scholar
ATNF SKA web site http://www.atnf.csiro.au/SKA/.Google Scholar