Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:33:27.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evolution of Angular Momentum of Intermediate Mass Stars: From the Birthline to the Main Sequence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

S. C. Wolff
Affiliation:
National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719
S. E. Strom
Affiliation:
National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719
L. A. Hillenbrand
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Dept. of Astronomy, MS 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Measurements of stars in the Orion OB association show that there is a continuous power law relationship between specific angular momentum (J/M) and mass (M) for stars on convective tracks having masses in the range ~0.5 to ~3 M; this power law extends smoothly into the domain of more massive stars on the ZAMS. If we assume that stars are “locked” to circumstellar accretion disks via their magnetic fields until they are deposited on the stellar birthline, we can account for the observed slope and zero point of the power law fit to the upper envelope of the observed J/M vs M distribution.

Pre-main sequence stars with M<2 M on radiative tracks do not follow the power law relationship. A sharp decrease in J/M with decreasing mass has been recognized for more than 30 years for older field stars, but remarkably is seen already among our Orion sample of stars that are only a few million years old. We show that this break in the power law is a consequence of loss of angular momentum on convective tracks, combined with core-envelope decoupling at the time of the transition from the convective to radiative tracks.

Type
Session 4 Rotation and Stellar Evolution
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Behrend, R., Maeder, A. 2001, A&A 373, 190 Google Scholar
Guenther, E. W., Lehmann, H., Emerson, J. P., Staude, J. 1999, A&A 341, 768 Google Scholar
Hartmann, L. 2002, ApJ 566, L29 Google Scholar
Herbst, W., Bailer-Jones, C.A.L., Mundt, R. 2001, ApJ 554, L197 Google Scholar
Johns-Krull, C. M., Valenti, J. A., Koresko, C. 1999, ApJ 516, 900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Königl, A. 1991, ApJ 370, L39 Google Scholar
Palla, F., Stahler, S. W. 1992, ApJ 392, 667 Google Scholar
Rebull, L.M. 2001, AJ 121, 1676 Google Scholar
Rebull, L.M., Wolff, S.C., Strom, S.E., Makidon, R.B. 2002, AJ 124, 546 Google Scholar
Shu, F., Najita, J., Ostriker, E., Wilkin, F., Ruden, S., Lizano, S. 1994, ApJ 429, 781 Google Scholar
Stahler, S. W. 1983, ApJ 274, 822 Google Scholar
Swenson, F.J., Faulkner, J., Rogers, F. J., Iglesias, C. A. 1994, ApJ 425, 286 Google Scholar
Wolff, S. C., Simon, T. 1997, PASP 109, 759 Google Scholar