Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:29:25.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

POLITENESS IN LANGUAGE: STUDIES IN ITS HISTORY, THEORY AND PRACTICE. Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich (Eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992. Pp. viii + 381. DM 152 cloth.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Elaine Tarone
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, P., & Levinson, S.. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 256289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B., & Nolen, W.. (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 93109.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 4158). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p's and q's. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 292305). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar